Tag: TL as leader

The Power of Digital Learning Environments

noniharrison on

Digital literacy and digital citizenship describe the key skills and dispositions of 21st century citizens. It is essential students develop these capacities within the context of 21st century learning to live and work effectively in and beyond school. As shown in Figure 1, digital learning environments [DLEs] provide the structural support for 21st century pedagogy to build digital citizenship and other 21st century skills (Keane & Keane, 2013). Digital citizenship, including digital literacy, must be embedded across the curriculum for it to be contextualised and therefore relevant, authentic, and sustainable (Earp, 2018). Ultimately, schools need to create DLEs that support deep learning across the curriculum and prepare students for life and work.

Framework showing supportive DLEs as a structure to enhance three elements of 21st century skills; foundation literacies, competencies (4 Cs), and character qualities, which lead to enhance lifelong learning
Figure 1. Students require 16 skills for the 21st century. Adapted from “New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology”, by World Economic Forum, 2015, p.3

A challenge in developing DLEs is to ensure information and communication technologies [ICTs] are used in transformative ways. Two common problems I have seen with ICT integration are overuse and passive use. Overuse includes the tendency of ICT-integrated lessons to become what Gonzalez (2016) calls “Grecian Urns”. Such lessons focus on the product over educational value. In the context of ICTs, the technology becomes the focus and deep learning is lost. While some functional or operational gains may be made, opportunities to develop digital citizenship and deep learning related to the curriculum are lost. ICT is also commonly used as a passive substitute for paper, with similar effects – loss of deep learning opportunities. ICTs should be used to support knowledge construction and help students develop critical and creative thinking, communication, and collaboration skills. As seen in Figure 2, the American Department of Education (2017) refers to the issue of passive use as the “digital use divide”. It is important to leverage ICTs in transformative ways to allow for in-depth application of digital citizenship practices and deep learning (Keane & Keane, 2013). This also creates the opportunity to connect to students’ third space and build digital citizenship in more authentic and meaningful ways (Harrison, 2019a; Harrison 2019b).

 

Graphic showing the difference between passive and active use of technology.
Figure 2. Digital use divide. Reprinted from “Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update”, by Department of Education United States of America, 2017, p.21.

Over the course of ETL523, my thinking has been extended and challenged. I have always held a firm belief in the critical role of technology in supporting the 21st century needs of students; however, the way this has translated to my practice has evolved over time and will continue to evolve having now taken this subject. The concept of digital citizenship in all its guises sits very well with me. The ability for students to create and consume information in ways that enrich their experiences and the experiences of others is powerful. I have been inspired to consider how my use of ICTs in teaching can extend the learning beyond the classroom walls through local and global collaboration. I am challenging myself this year to connect with experts or other schools using Skype in the classroom and Microsoft Teams to extend the communication and collaboration portals of my classroom.

The role of TLs has always been inherently servant-based leadership but, as I have noted in several reflections in the past, it is more than that. TLs work as instructional leaders and transformational leaders to guide the entire school community in developing their skills and inspire the community to delve deeper into effective teaching and learning practices. Fullan (2013) explains the key drivers to change as capacity building, collaborative work, pedagogy, and systemness supported through professional learning communities. He says “people are motivated by good ideas tied to action” (Hargreaves & Fullan, 2012, p.7). As a TL, I can use my position to lead from the middle to garner support for the prioritisation and ongoing development of our DLE. Already this term, the library team has developed an online professional learning space for teachers, with the intention to build communities of practice across the college. Once teachers see the power of the DLE in their own learning, this might transfer to their classrooms. As TLs are change leaders, we are well-positioned to support the school in developing effective policy and environments to support the whole school community and enhance student learning outcomes (Johnston, 2012).

 

References

Department of Education United States of America. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

Earp, J. (2018, November 21). Curriculum integration of digital citizenship. Retrieved from https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/articles/curriculum-integration-of-digital-citizenship

Fullan, M. (2013). Maximising leadership for change [Participant booklet]. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/14_AU_Final-Workbook_web.pdf

Gonzalez, J. (2016, October 30). Is your lesson a Grecian urn? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/grecian-urn-lesson/

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.

Harrison, N. (2019a, March 13). Reflection: Module 1.0a. Digital learning environments [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/nharrison/2019/03/13/reflection-module-1-0/

Harrison, N. (2019b, March 24). Reflection: Module 2.2. Digital fluency and third space [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/nharrison/2019/03/24/reflection-module-2-2/

Johnston, M. P. (2012). School librarians as technology integration leaders: Enablers and barriers to leadership enactment. School Library Research, 15. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/

Keane, W. & Keane, T. (2013). Deep learning, ICT and 21st century skills: Leading for education quality [Conference paper]. Retrieved from https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/ae199457-ab1e-4787-ac72-9844c8a0214a/1/PDF%20%28Published%20version%29.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf

 

[Assessment 3 Part B Critical Reflection]

The Evidence-based TL

noniharrison on

Evidenced-based practice should not only drive pedagogical initiatives of classroom teachers, it should also be at the core of the work of teacher librarians. Evidence can be used to identify a need or problem, plan and implement initiatives, and evaluate and reflect on those programs. It can also be used to justify library initiatives and programs, budgetary and staffing requirements, and a range of other resourcing needs. That being said, when evidence is gathered by the practitioner for advocacy purposes, the trustworthiness of the evidence and its interpretation comes into question. Therefore, it is vital evidence gathering practices are holistic and incorporate a range of methods.

Vertical and horizontal data sets can help schools better understand their students’ learning journey, while considering their specific context. Data is easily interpreted in a myriad of ways and can be manipulated to suit purpose. It becomes an issue when data is used to compare school performance, rather than focusing on individual student progression. The focus must be on student learning outcomes rather than outcomes. Therefore, vertical data gathered from high-stakes testing should be used in conjunction with horizontal data that provides a more holistic picture of students’ learning levels (Renshaw, Baroutsis, van Kraayenoord, Goos, & Dole, 2013).

Teacher librarians adopt a holistic approach to evidence-based practice by considering the whole school with which they serve and by drawing on a range of evidence in a range of ways (Gillespie, 2013). As seen in Figure 1, Todd (2015) proposes a holistic model for school libraries, which includes evidence for practice (Foundational: informational), evidence in practice (Process: transformational), and evidence of practice (Outcomes: formational). Furthermore, Robins (2015) highlights the usefulness of action research as part of a holistic approach to collect qualitative and quantitative data and connect educational research with improved practice. Oddone (2017) provides an overview of action research for school libraries as seen in Figure 2.

A table, which shows Todd's three categories of evidence-based practice. 1. Evidence FOR Practice - FOUNDATION Informational: Existing formal research provides the essential building blocks for professional practice. 2. Evidence IN Practice - Applications/Actions PROCESS Transformational: Locally produced evidence—data generated by practice (librarian-observed evidence)—is meshed with research-based evidence to provide a dynamic decision-making environment. 3. Evidence OF Practice - Results—impacts and outcomes; evidence of closing of gap OUTCOMES Formational User-reported evidence shows that the learner changes as a result of inputs, interventions, activities, and processes.
Figure 1: Holistic model of evidence-based practice for school librarians (Todd, 2015).

 

Infographic showing: Action Research for Teacher Librarians: A brief introduction and overview to Action Research as a tool for evidence based practice for teacher librarians.
Figure 2: Action Research for Teacher Librarians: A brief introduction and overview to Action Research as a tool for evidence based practice for teacher librarians. (Oddone, 2017).

Gillespie (2013) found that teacher librarians gather evidence through two key modes; by engaging and encountering. The nature of evidence-based practice is therefore not linear. Teacher librarians gather evidence through purposeful and accidental encounters, which involves research-based and/or practitioner-based evidence and application for improved practice through a combination of intuition and reflection (Gillespie, 2013). As with improvement in any field, particularly education, reflection is key to driving improvement as it provides the metacognitive prompts to interpret evidence and consider the practitioner’s professional experience and expertise that is needed to apply evidence meaningfully.

Teacher librarians can utilise evidence-gathering tools to gather evidence for, in and of practice. Gillespie (2013) recommends valuable evidence is drawn from and used within three areas; including, teaching and learning, library management, and professional practice. A tool such as School Library Impact Measure (which I spoke about in my final assessment for ETL504) equips teacher librarians with a framework to assess the impact of their instruction on student learning outcomes during a Guided Inquiry experience (Todd, Kuhlthau, & Heinstrom, 2005). To gather evidence of library management, including collection development, the environment, and services, teacher librarians can source benchmarks from peer institutions, questionnaires or surveys to evaluate performance, set new goals or standards and implement strategies. Benchmarks from peer institutions can be sourced through network meetings and through the Softlink survey.

As a school library that runs a college-wide academic reading and writing program, we utilise data to assess the extent to which the programs effectively improve student learning. Reading comprehension tests help the teacher librarians and teachers determine the effect of the strategies on student abilities. Teacher librarians should work with heads of department and classroom teachers to analyse and digest the data in meaningful ways. Collaboration is central to the perception of the data analysis process. Teachers do not want to fall victim to judgement due to the results within their class. While this is important to note, it is also important to hold honest and open conversations about opportunities the data may present. Viewing the results through an opportunities lens ensures all stakeholders feel safe and valued and student learning is central.

This year, I have been delving deeper into the world of data and evidence to assess the impact the Study Skills program has for our boarding students. The program is designed to assist boarding students with; organisation, prioritisation, study skills, assessment skills, and research skills, while growth mindset underpins the sessions. A teacher librarian (myself on Tuesday and Wednesday nights and our Head of Library on Monday nights) facilitate a half hour targeted session with the students in the senior library – one cohort per night on a weekly rotation. These sessions are timely and relevant to the assessment and class work to ensure the value is clear. After the half hour session, the students undertake their independent study for the remaining hour and a half, while the teacher librarian circulates and assist students in smaller groups and one-on-one. I am pleased to share that since the inception of the program last year, the boarders’ results are trending up – often at a greater rate than the day students. While many factors influence the boarders’ results (strategies from classroom teachers, tutoring, support from boarding supervisors and parents for example), the results are also indicative of the renewed impetus for study and a changing culture that has developed from the program. The program has been a feat of collaboration and has seen staff members from across the college come together for this common cause. To gather evidence, I was able to use data from both Learning Analytics and TASS to compare day and boarding groups, and boarding groups over time. This also provides me with opportunities to compare external high-stakes results, such as NAPLAN results, with curriculum results. This evidence was used to not only assess the effectiveness of the program but also to open conversations with staff and students about learning outcomes. From this, I created a report to document the findings and present to teaching staff and leadership team (Figure 3). I have had incredibly valuable conversations with students concerning their progress and strategies going forward. One-on-one, I talked to students about their GPAs, compared these against their report cards, then again against their individual assessment tasks to identify strengths and areas for improvement. The additional ownership students took of their results and the empowerment felt was palpable. The evidence is used to evaluate and reflect on the programs, to plan targeted sessions, to empower students, and to advocate for the work done by the teacher librarians.

Title page of Study Skills report. The pages states: "Study Skills, 6-monthly report 2018 Semester one.
Figure 3: Title page of Study Skills report.

Ultimately, learning must be at the centre of the analysis, discussion and subsequent initiatives or action. Evidence must be gathered on a local level to determine the effectiveness of library programs and through other means, such as empirical research, to ensure best practice. Evidence must be made explicit and concerted efforts must be made to “measure the relationship between inputs, outputs, actions and student outcomes” (Hughes, Bozorgian, & Allan, 2014, p. 15). These practices can help to ensure the longevity of the school library and assert the library and staff as invaluable to the school community.

 

 

References

Gillespie, A. (2013). Untangling the evidence: Teacher librarians and evidence based practice [Thesis]. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/61742/2/Ann_Gillespie_Thesis.pdf

Hughes, H., Bozorgian, H. & Allan, C. (2014). School libraries, teacher-librarians and student outcomes: Presenting and using the evidence. School Libraries Worldwide, 20(1), 29-50. doi: 10.14265.20.1.004

Oddone, K. (2017). Action research for teacher librarians [Infographic]. Retrieved from https://my.visme.co/projects/jwvj7ogk-action-research-for-teacher-librarians#s1

Renshaw, P., Baroutsis, A., van Kraayenoord, C., Goos, M., and Dole, S. (2013).  Teachers using classroom data well:  Identifying key features of effective practices. Final report. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/teachers-using-classroom-data-well.pdf

Robins, J. (2015). Action research empowers school librarians. School library research, 18, 1-38. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.csu.edu.au

Todd, R. J. (2015). Evidence-based practice and school libraries: Interconnections of evidence, advocacy, and actions. Knowledge Quest, 43(3), 8-15. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au

Todd, R., Kuhlthau, C. & Heinström, J. (2005). School library impact measure SLIM: A toolkit and handbook for tracking and assessing student learning outcomes of guided inquiry through the school library. Retrieved from https://cissl.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/slimtoolkit.pdf

Teacher Librarianship: Leadership and Collaboration

noniharrison on

Reflection

This subject has highlighted the importance of effective teamwork and leadership in schools. While servant leadership is characteristic of teacher librarians (TLs), I have come to understand my own leadership style as much broader. The combination of instructional and transformational leadership, known as leadership for learning (Dempster et al., 2017), resonates with me as TLs are first and foremost teachers who work with others to drive teaching and learning improvement (Herring, 2007). This leadership style is often associated with principalship; however, it has strong connections with the roles of a TL. TLs easily address each of the dimensions of leadership for learning through their participation in; ongoing professional development of self and others, networking opportunities, teaching and learning, and evidenced-based practice.

The middle leadership position of a TL enables them to be both a leader and constituent. This dichotomy develops trust and collegiality through reciprocal relationships and mutual respect (Harrison, 2018a). This reminded me of the adage “I must follow them, for I am their leader” (Rosthorn, 2016). I feel this neatly encompasses the humility and reciprocity needed of effective teams and leaders. This sets the precedent for leadership of a shared moral purpose and demonstrates the dynamic nature of middle leadership.

Through the case study work, collaboration was challenging due to conflicting commitments and levels of participation. At times, I lead the group response, while other times I stepped back to let others take a leadership role. Collaboration is integral to successful teamwork; therefore, I attempted to inspire collaboration through questioning to engage the conversation and team. While this was not always successful, I believe it demonstrated my intention to create a sense of collegiality. Collaboration between colleagues is crucial in schools, as it breaks down barriers that isolate teachers, increases visibility of leaders (particularly TLs), and opens dialogue to test theories and draw on a range of expertise (Griffin, Bui, & Care, 2013; Harrison, 2018b). This sharing also leads to enhanced student outcomes through team commitment and motivation (Rajhans, 2012). The teamwork skills required of the group work were also reflected in the case studies themselves. Throughout the case studies, it was clear the Director of Information Services required teamwork and leadership skills to improve the department dynamic and performance outcomes of the libraries (Group 4, 2018a; Group 4, 2018b). Foremost, effective communication was consistently needed to enable a collaborative culture and improve conflict management. This positive workplace environment leads to enhanced efficiency and productivity (Aramyan, 2015), which is integral to the service nature of school libraries.

The difficulties experienced during the case studies, while at times unique to the online environment, mirror communication difficulties or passiveness and complacency in the workplace. There is much evidence to suggest complacency is the enemy of success, particularly in the changing education landscape (Ballantyne, 2016). Technology and growing information landscapes can threaten job security if complacency reigns. TLs as leaders must be at the forefront of innovation in education to contribute to the development of lifelong learners. This requires a plethora of knowledge, skills, behaviours, and dispositions to demonstrate leadership, grit and perseverance (Moreillon, 2018). Leadership for learning acutely encompasses these characteristics while inspiring commitment and action through the formation of shared purpose and strong professional relationships.

 

References

Aramyan, P. (2015, October 8). 5 ways workplace communication effectiveness can increase productivity [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://explore.easyprojects.net/blog/5-ways-workplace-communication-effectiveness-can-increase-productivity

Ballantyne, R. (2016, June 30). Complacency ‘killing Australian education’. The Educator Australia. Retrieved from https://www.theeducatoronline.com/au/news/complacency-killing-australian-education/218721

Dempster, N., Townsend, T., Johnson, G., Bayetto, A., Lovett, S., & Stevens, E. (2017). Leadership and literacy: Principals, partnerships and pathways to improvement. Retrieved from Proquest Ebook Central.

Griffin, P., Bui, M., & Care, E. (2013). Understanding and analysing 21st-century skills learning outcomes using assessments. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. L. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 53-64). Retrieved from Proquest Ebook Central.

Group 4. (2018a, August 3). Group 4 case study 3 [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_32450_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&conf_id=_58831_1&forum_id=_130876_1&message_id=_1928007_1

Group 4. (2018b, September 8). Group 4 case study 4 [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_32450_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&conf_id=_58831_1&forum_id=_130879_1&message_id=_1980778_1

Harrison, N. (2018a, July 28). Reflection: Module 2.3 [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/nharrison/2018/07/28/module-2-3-reflection/

Harrison, N. (2018b, September 1). Reflection: Module 4.2 [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/nharrison/?s=constituent#.W7LOkBMzbOQ

Herring, J. (2007). Teacher librarians and the school library. In S. Ferguson (Ed.) Libraries in the twenty-first century: Charting new directions in information (pp.27-42). Retrieved from Elsevier ScienceDirect Books Complete.

Moreillon, J. (2018, February 26). Grit, complacency, and passion [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.schoollibrarianleadership.com/2018/02/26/grit-complacency-and-passion/

Rajhans, K. (2012). Effective organizational communication: A key to employee motivation and performance. Interscience Management Review, 2(2), 81-85. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d74f/ce848669ba68f7a8929a9ec1a108758a98b9.pdf

Rosthorn, A. (2016, December 15). There go the people. I must follow them. Tribune magazine. Retrieved from http://www.tribunemagazine.org/2016/12/i-must-follow-them-for-i-am-their-leader/

 

[Assessment 2 Part B: Reflective Practice]

21st century learning and inquiry

noniharrison on

21st century skills can be defined in what seems to be an infinite number of ways. Ultimately, what the definitions have in common are specific skills, process or traits learners require to work and live effectively now and into the future. These include learning skills (4 Cs), literacy skills, and life skills (Thoughtful Learning, 2017). 21st century skills, specifically the 4 C’s, are crucial in the current education climate. Rather than outcomes-based, content-driven curriculum, we see the majority of senior syllabus documents reference and require students to work through inquiry processes, while a minority require a problem-based process. Either way, these processes require students to commit to and utilise the 4 C’s – communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity (Partnership for 21st Century Learning, 2017a). The stages of the inquiry process as outlined by Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2018) identify reflection as a central cog, constantly interacting with the processes of forming, finding, analysing, and evaluating. Within the overarching inquiry process, students can collaborate to form their inquiry and find valid and reliable evidence, critically analyse, interpret and evaluate their findings, while communicating their ideas. Throughout the entire process students must reflect creatively to try new approaches and revise their process. TLs also work with the general capabilities and cross-curriculum priorities to meet national requirements and embed these practices into learning experiences.

 

The role of the library in this 21st century space

TLs and school libraries can play a key role in supporting schools in their 21st century endeavours. Taking insight from Partnership for 21st Century Learning’s (2017b) framework, planning for 21st century learning environments involves the following considerations, assessment and accountability, leadership and culture, learning, teaching and professional learning, and infrastructure. TLs provide leadership in learning and professional development and provide environments that nurture 21st learning activities. Furthermore, through collaboration TLs can work across the school network to ensure high-quality assessment is offered and the school program is meeting accountability measures. Currently, with the incoming senior curriculum, our library is supporting the Deputy of Teaching and Learning to map the cognitive verbs across all year levels. The intent is to upskill students in these cognitive processes and ingrain the metalanguage in all years in preparation for the skills required of the senior program. We are using software to record the skills across subject areas and year levels and will then assess gaps and opportunities. Additionally, through our work with Assignment Help Pages and curation of assignment support material, we collaborate with teachers on the development of assessment items. We assist teachers to ensure the assessment aligns with the required achievement outcomes, standard elaborations, and cognitive verbs and where appropriate through a process of inquiry. We support the Centre for Learning Enrichment to develop formative and summative tasks suitable for a variety of learning needs and curate resources to support these specific learning needs. The library environment can also work as a place for this learning, collaboration and assessment to occur. Library spaces should be flexible, engaging, and conducive to 21st century learning. The availability of a range of resources including staff, technology, print resources, and flexible seating areas allows students and teachers to work in more dynamic ways than a traditional classroom. Elliott (2010) describes this type of library as a Learning Commons, whereby students can enquire, create, collaborate and explore. But what’s in a name? Does the name need to be the defining factor? A library can be a learning commons, a place for staff and students to come together and further their learning experiences, without the need for a name change. It’s far more important for the principles and vision to be clear and enacted than for a new name and no action. After all, we want students to go out into the world and engage with libraries beyond the school setting. They need to know that libraries are learning commons and neither are exclusive or separate entities. Nevertheless, sometimes a name change automatically changes perceptions – but there must be substance behind this. The Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada provide a clear framework to guide libraries in the change toward a school-wide learning commons environment (Koechlin, & Sykes, 2014). These standards also clearly reflect 21st century skills. To cater to the needs of the community and future-proof the library space and services, a learning commons approach should be adopted. This way, the library “encourages participatory learning and allows for co-construction of understanding from a variety of sources” (Holland, 2015, para. 3). Schools and classrooms are still isolated spaces where teachers work in isolation. In contrast, a learning commons approach makes teaching and learning visible and collaborative. It’s not about teaching in a fish bowl, rather it is about everyone diving in.

 

References

Elliott, C. (2010). School library to learning commons: Planning the journey. Synergy, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.slav.vic.edu.au/synergy/volume-8-number-2-2010/learning-landscapes/82-school-library-to-learning-commons-planning-the-journey.html

Holland, B. (2015). 21st-century libraries: The learning commons. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/21st-century-libraries-learning-commons-beth-holland

Koechlin, C & Sykes, J. (2014). Canadian school libraries leading learning. Synergy, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.slav.vic.edu.au/synergy/volume-12-number-2-2014/perspectives-global/426-canadian-school-libraries-leading-learning.html

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2017a). Above and beyond [Infographic]. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/4csposter.pdf

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2017b). Building your roadmap for 21st century learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.roadmap21.org/

Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2018). Senior secondary: A–Z senior subject list. Retrieved from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/senior/a-z-subject-list

Thoughtful Learning. (2017). What are 21st century skills? [FAQ]. Retrieved from https://k12.thoughtfullearning.com/FAQ/what-are-21st-century-skills

 

[Reflection: Module 4.3]

TLs as leaders through collaboration and professional learning

noniharrison on

TLs as leaders initiate change, guide schools through change, and support staff and students through the process. There are several areas by which TLs can empower learners, both staff and students. A collective sense of trust is integral to successful leadership. Collegiality and strong professional relationships are paramount in garnering support in the pursuit of enhanced capacity (American Association of School Librarians (AASL), 2013). As mentioned in my first assignment for ETL504, I see the leadership areas of a TL as including leadership of curriculum (knowing content, syllabus requirements, and assessment modes), “pedagogy (leading quality teaching and learning processes including professional development and instruction), strategy (leadership that drives the moral purpose, school culture and other ethical considerations including learning needs), and literacy (including leadership for 21st century skills)” (Harrison, 2018). AASL (2013) suggest these strengths enhance the professional relationships of TLs, as these areas of effective leadership must be visible to the community, require active participation in various committees and networks within and outside the school environment, and ensure the practices of the TL are relevant and reflective of 21st century skills. A middle leader TL with professional autonomy, visibility within the school and respect from peers becomes a useful tool in navigating change necessary to respond to 21st century demands.

Specifically, elearning ecologies are changing and will continue to change the way teaching and learning occurs in schools. The integration of digital technologies in all facets of teaching and learning have the potential to increase the level of learning and scope and quality of teaching practices. This embedded use of digital technology must be accompanied by a clear vision and goals, high expectations, identified desired outcomes, culture of risk-taking that is encouraged by the leadership team, empowerment of teachers, and collaboration between the whole school community including families (Lee, 2015). School libraries are situated to lead schools in this form of academic and pedagogical risk-taking, to support the school in technology integration, and provide expert modelling of technology in teaching practice. As Carr identifies, collaboration is key to enhancing TL visibility, respect, and trust within a school (2008). Collaboration is not only an important skill for students in the 21st century, it is also integral for teachers to adopt and model. Collaboration helps alleviate professional burden, fosters inclusivity and provides teachers and families with a sense of worth or value during decision-making processes. Collaboration can also increase motivation and job satisfaction.

A summary of Carr’s (2008) six factors of successful collaboration are presented in the table below.

Factor Explanation
Environmental Does the school now and historically support collaboration? What are the previous experiences and opinions of collaboration?
Membership Who is needed to be part of the collaboration?
Process Do members have roles, understand their positions, and understand the decision-making process?
Communication Is open communication established through formal and informal means or a combination?
Purpose Is there a common purpose and shared objectives?
Resources What resources are required and available?

 

Similarly, Bell, Van Roekel and Weimar (2013) use the REACH acronym to outline successful collaboration; respect your counterparts, educate yourself regarding the role of the individual with whom you want to build a bridge, assume responsibility as the one to reach out, communicate and collaborate, help one another to provide the very best instruction and experiences for students. Collaboration should be at the core of the TL’s practice and can be done in a myriad of ways. Collaborative learning through professional development initiatives or opportunities is one area whereby TLs can both lead constituents and follow. As with supporting student needs, TLs must provide professional development opportunities just in time rather than just in case. Effective professional development focuses on learning that improves teaching practice by enhancing teachers’ understanding of their subject area and equipping teachers with skills to enhance student learning through strategies that teach and assess deep understanding (Cole, 2012). Ultimately, it must enhance teacher capacity in a way that enhances student achievement through the application of best practice. TLs can help to develop an effective professional learning culture by supporting teachers in delivering professional development through resourcing, organisation and facilitations, and can assist those that have participated in professional learning to transfer that learning to classroom practice through collaborative planning and interpretation of new learnings. TLs can also, themselves, offer and deliver professional development, whether that be through the facilitation of external providers sourced through networking opportunities or through the TL’s delivery of information. Collaboration in professional learning helps to de-privatise teaching practice, which supports the development of collegiality and highlights the importance of a school culture that values life-long learning not only for students but also staff.

 

References

American Association of School Librarians (AASL). (2013). Empowering learners: Guidelines for school library programs. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au

Bell, M. A., Van Roekel, J. L., & Weimar, H. (2013). School librarians and the technology department: A practical guide to successful collaboration  [Linworth version]. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Carr, J. (Ed.). (2008). Leadership for excellence: Insights of the national school library media program of the year award winners. Retrieved from https://portal-igpublish-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/

Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Retrieved from http://ptrconsulting.com.au/sites/default/files/linking_effective_professional_learning_with_effective_teaching_practice_-_cole.pdf

Harrison, N. (2018, September 1). Assessment 1: School leadership structure concept map and critical analysis [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/nharrison/2018/09/01/assessment-1-school-leadership-structure-concept-map-and-critical-analysis

Lee, M. (2015). Digital technology and student learning: The impact of the ecology – Part 1. Retrieved from https://educationtechnologysolutions.com.au/2015/11/digital-technology-and-student-learning-the-impact-of-the-ecology-part-1/

 

[Reflection: Module 4.2]

Collaborative Acquisition

noniharrison on

The role of the Teacher Librarian and expertise required is different to that required by all teachers. Teacher Librarians are required to possess additional skills in curriculum leadership, as well as expertise in literacy in all its forms; traditional, information and digital. According to the Australian School Library Association, as well as being trained teachers, Teacher Librarians are curriculum leaders, information specialists, and information service managers (2012). A Teacher Librarian also requires mentoring skills needed to support both students and teachers. As well as having a bird’s eye view of the curriculum and school, Teacher Librarians are educators of information literacy, organisers and creators of resources, and advocates and innovators of technology and social learning (Herring, 2017). The Education Directorate concludes, “Teacher librarians combine a command of 21st century pedagogies and curricula with expertise in information science: the analysis, collection, classification, manipulation, storage, retrieval, movement, dissemination, and protection of information” (2016, p.3). This differs from that of the expertise of other teachers, as the focus of classroom teachers is perhaps narrower, and they do not necessarily have the skills or time to manage resources on a large scale or assist students and others in the development of a range of literacy skills.

Teacher Librarians must also be masters in collaboration to support teachers and students. To successfully support library clients, Teacher Librarians must stay abreast of changes in curriculum and delivery methods across the school. Effective ways to collaborate across the school community include; participation in departmental meetings, presentation of Professional Development opportunities, and participation in active networking across the school community. Without being seen in the school community, Teacher Librarians will find it very difficult to develop and maintain a relevant and useful collection suited to the needs of staff and students. Specific ways to open the collection acquisition process include; inviting staff to peruse resources prior to purchasing, working with staff to develop Assignment Help Pages and identify gaps in the collection related to specific tasks and units of work, and informing staff of the changes occurring within the collection including acquisition and weeding. Ultimately, the school community should be involved and have a voice in the process of collection development, as an integral part of the role of the Teacher Librarian is to support the teaching and learning activities that occur within schools.

Furthermore, to develop a collection that is engaging and useful, students must be involved in the selection of resources. According to Evans, when considering resources, students’ Normative needs, Felt needs, and Comparative needs must be met (2008). In particular, Felt needs refer to what students want to read. If this need is met, a school library will be able to better cater for their clientele and will likely be more successful (Evans, 2008). Students may have the opportunity to select books for purchase during book fairs, submit requests, speak directly and informally with library staff or vote for the acquisition of specific books. Additionally, libraries may undertake a needs analysis of the student cohort (Isebe, 2015).

Ultimately, the final decision to acquire resources may lie with either the Head Teacher Librarian or if a contentious resource that may provide controversial viewpoints or perspectives that go against school ethos or values, the decision should lie with the Deputy of Teaching and Learning or the Headmaster. Additionally, if the resource is to support specific teaching and learning activities for an assessment task or learning experience, the decision may lie with the Head of Department or teacher who requires the resource. Teacher Librarians are in an advantageous position to offer support and advice for specific resources and are in the position to approve the purchase of resources; however, they are not an island and must work in collaboration and support of the whole school community. Thus, it is clear that the decision to acquire certain resources is a shared process.

 

References

Australian School Library Association. (2018). What is a teacher librarian? Retrieved from http://www.asla.org.au/advocacy/what-is-a-teacher-librarian.aspx

Education Directorate. (2016). School libraries: The heart of 21st century learning. Retrieved from https://www.education.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/916301/School-Libraries-21st-Century.pdf

Evans, G. E. (2008). Reflections on creating information service collections. In K. Haycock & B. Sheldon (Eds.), The portable MLIS (pp. 87 –97). Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.

Herring, J. (2017). The future role of the teacher librarian. Connections, 100, 10-11. Retrieved from http://www2.curriculum.edu.au/scis/connections/issue_100/print_complete_issue/print_issue_100.html

Isebe, M. (2015). Effective selection and organization of information resources in school library. International Journal of Library and Information Science Studies, 1(1), 27-33. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/journals/international-journal-library-information-science-studies-ijliss/vol-1-issue-1june-2015/

 

[Forum Reflection: Module 2.2]