Distribution of leadership

What strategies to take you from TL, the keeper and stamper of the books and the quiet space (library) (how many of our colleagues perceive TLs), to become something different?

The role of the TL is so much more complex than many of our colleagues realise. We are the keeper of the books, though scanning has taken the place of stamping in most schools. We are the keepers of the (sometimes) quiet space, but we also are leaders in our learning communities. Among our colleagues, we form communities of practise and learning. Through collaboration we can both model and learn new teaching approaches, we can pose questions and encourage ways of thinking that previously lurked unrecognised in a TR cupboard. We can collaborate on curriculum development, integration of technology and information skills into the wider curriculum, attaching a genuine purpose to the skills students must learn in these areas.

The space we keep is not just quiet. It is a cone of silence. We listen to peoples’ troubles, concerns, frustrations and annoyances and provide a prodigious amount of chocolate and bickies to keep them coming back. By listening to our colleagues both individually and as a group, by keeping our ears to the ground we can start to recognise patterns and point them in the direction of assistance. We can recognise and celebrate the achievements of our colleagues and are in a position to communicate and promote various initiatives within the school and from the leadership that aim to address the frustrations. In an ideal world, the principal is in a position to provide visionary leadership – to develop transformational goals and map the pathways to success (Ingram, 2017). They motivate and inspire their staff to keep them on the paths set out. The DPs provide the transactional leadership – they keep the wheels in motion, putting out the spot fires and dealing with the day to day operations of the school, keeping the big picture in mind. The APs also provide transactional leadership, keeping the ball rolling and dealing with the everyday smooth running of their stage. The TL provides the servant leadership – focusing on trust, collaboration, empathy and ethics (Burkus, 2010). The TL works to promote the best interests of colleagues, students and the community.

Each leader has role to play in the success of the school. In this way, leadership in the school is often actually a type of distributed leadership – not because some leaders are responsible for different key learning areas, or certain initiatives, but because they are responsible for providing the very different types of leadership needed to keep the school both ticking over and reaching for the next milestone in their improvement journey.

References

Ingram, D. (2019, Fevruary 4). Transformational leadership vs transactional leadership definition. Hearst Newspapers: Small Business. http://smallbusiness.chron.com/transformational-leadership-vs-transactional-leadership-definition-13834.html

Burkus, D. (2010, April 1). Servant leadership theory. David Burkus. http://davidburkus.com/2010/04/servant-leadership-theory/

CSU Library

Go to the CSU Library and explore the library site. How does this library change information sources to information resources? Record 5 items in your notes and consider relevance in the school library context.

 

I am unable to access the physical CSU library due to location, so i evaluated the library website. As CSU is a university with a special interest and skill in distance education, I feel that this is an appropriate method of observing the services offered to distance students like myself. I have grouped my observations into 5 groups:

  1. organisation of information sources by subject
  2. educational offerings such as tutorials and workshops
  3. book-based and digital resource lending
  4. Ask A Librarian service
  5. community services such as access for high schools and alumni

The CSU library offers students studying particular subjects curated readings that are searchable by subject as well as by topic, author and keywords. This service includes reserve and e-reserve, reading lists, industry specific database access, but also includes teams of librarians dedicated to particular disciplines. The CSU library employs:

These teams are responsible for selection and deselection and curation of discipline-specific resources. Employing focused teams of specialist librarians allows the library to ensure it is providing the most comprehensive, up-to-date, relevant resources for students and academic staff. These teams can collaborate with teaching staff on course development and resource provision to ensure the collection is as relevant and current as possible and meets the needs of students and academic staff alike. In school libraries, this is done on a much smaller scale. Usually the teacher librarian collaborates with class teachers or subject teams to do the same job as the faculty teams at CSU library: ensuring teachers and students have access to current, relevant resources.

The CSU library offers students workshops, tutorials and recorded webinars on aspects of information literacy, including assignment writing advice, research assistance, digital citizenship advice etc. Students can access this information at point of need or can peruse more general subjects at their leisure. In the school library, these skills are often taught in library lessons or during one-on-one student assistance or booked classes. In high schools, it may be appropriate to include some similar resources on the library website.

The print and digital collection is made available to students and staff of the university through the Primo interface. Using authorised access points along with browsing options, library users can discover resources that suit their needs and can request these resources be posted or digitised for distance students. Providing access to a variety of databases as well as interlibrary loans provides access to a greater variety of resources than would be available in a traditional print-based lending library. Teacher librarians can work to form community partnerships with local public libraries as well as specialist collections such as the Henry Parkes Equity Centre Library in order to increase the offerings for the school community.

The Ask A Librarian service assists students and staff by providing research assistance and providing help to intellectually access the information resources available through the library. By responding to requests for information not only with the answer to the question, but with an explanation as to how that answer was obtained, librarians can model for patrons how information seeking can be undertaken. Teacher librarians do this in schools everyday, though usually in person. Recently the Softlink team added an “Ask the library” button to the LMS Oliver, allowing students to ask questions remotely, which may be particularly useful for students who wish to investigate sensitive or personal subjects.

The CSU library offers access to its collections and services for alumni and high school students, increasing the information opportunities for students and, simultaneously raising the profile of the university and university library in the community.

ETL402 Assessment 2 Part B

Reflection

Upon beginning ETL402 – see my post ETL402: Literature Across the Curriculum (Hahn, 2020, November 7), I identified that a significant skill I wanted to develop is matching of user with literature. I suspected that it involved a thorough and up-to-date knowledge of the literature landscape, collection, students, and curriculum. I hoped to expand my knowledge of each element and their interactions. And so I have.

In my post, ETL402 Module 1.1 (Hahn, 2020, November 14), I discussed the instructive nature of children’s literature: the religious focus may have shifted, but students are still learning from literature. Teacher librarians must ensure the collection is developed continually, offering a broad selection of current, quality literature in various formats, supporting the curriculum and specific needs of the school community. Resource promotion at point-of-need is important. In my post ETL402 Module 2.1 Professional Knowledge of Children’s Literature (Hahn, 2020, November 21), I discussed strategies for connecting teachers with literature. The creation of reading lists tagged with syllabus links (Cherrstrom and Boden, 2020) has been positive in conjunction with a reference interviews. Annotated bibliographies have been developed, however staff are reluctant to read them. Book talking at planning meetings proved very successful. This leads me to suspect, and Merga (2019) and Bishop (2011) confirm, collaborative magic lies in the relationships teacher librarians form with teachers.

Diversity is a goal for my school library. My module 2.3a forum post (Hahn, 2020, December 5) identified an indigenous literature focus, but it applies equally to other types of diversity. It is important for all students to see themselves reflected in the literature available to them (Crisp et al., 2016) and yet our collection does not adequately depict the lived experiences of our students. Reflecting through a censorship lens, I do not believe this was a deliberate act of exclusion, rather, a failure to pay specific attention to inclusion. I am less certain that this is true of subculture representations such as LGBTQ. Careful and deliberate selection of literature with prominent, diverse characters will be imperative.

Despite Pietschmann’s (2014) contention that primary students cannot comprehend intertextual links sufficiently to access transmedia content, it is through interaction with such content that they will develop these skills (Sukovic, 2014). It will therefore be necessary to augment the digital collection, an area currently almost non-existent in our fiction collection, a not unusual situation, according to O’Connell et al. (2015) but one that must be addressed. As my discussion post for module 5.2 (Hahn, 2020, December 28) suggests, an important notion I will take away is that the digital nature of a resource must give the reader/viewer something that cannot be accessed from the print version.

The teacher librarian is a leader of pedagogy as well as of literature and literacy. Collaboration with class teachers, promotion of resources from a literary learning perspective and provision of professional literature and development required to implement such learning is a vital part of what we do and contributes greatly to the impact the school library can have. The promotion of free reading and literary engagement is vital. My post, Expanding free reading ETL402 (Hahn, 2021, January 2), described two strategies I would like to implement during browsing sessions and discussion in the module 3.1 forum provided many others.

Part B Reference List

Allen & Unwin. (2009, June 25). Anita Heiss — Aboriginal writing: Literature as a political tool [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/0x_34uJww_E

 

Bishop, K. (2011). Connecting libraries with classrooms : The curricular roles of the media specialist. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

 

Cherrstrom, C. A., & Boden, C. J. (2020). Expanding role and potential of curation in education: A systematic review of the literature, The Reference Librarian, 61(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2020.1776191

 

Crisp, T., Knezek, S. M., Quinn, M., Bingham, G. E., Girardeau, K., & Starks, F. (2016). What’s on Our Bookshelves? The Diversity of Children’s Literature in Early Childhood Classroom Libraries. Journal of Children’s Literature, 42(2), 29–42.

 

Merga, M. (2019). Collaborating with teacher librarians to support adolescents’ literacy and literature learning. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 63 (1), 65-72 https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.958

 

O’Connell, J., Bales, J., & Mitchell, P. (2015). [R]Evolution in reading cultures: 2020 vision for school libraries. Australian Library Journal, 64(3), 194–208. https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1080/00049670.2015.1048043

 

Pietschmann, D. Volkel, S. & Ohler.P. (2014). Limitations of transmedia storytelling for children: A cognitive development analysis. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2259-2281. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2612/1205

 

Sukovic, S. (2014). iTell: Transliteracy and Digital Storytelling. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(3), 205–229. https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1080/00048623.2014.951114

Expanding free reading ETL402

Today I read some really very interesting articles about recreational reading. Krashen (2011) lays out the results of a variety of studies that, taken together, indicate that regular sustained, silent reading (SSR) results in better vocabulary, spelling, comprehension, writing, test performance, general knowledge and increased reading outside of the classroom. Fisher & Frey (2018) point out the advantages that are to be had from increasing the volume of reading students engage in outside of school They suggest that access to books – which should ideally be on a 7 books/student ratio in the classroom and 20/student in the school library – is not sufficient on its own to increase reading volume and must be backed up with teaching choosing strategies and book recommendations from people close to the students – teachers, peers, parents etc. They discuss two strategies I had not been able to articulate previously:

  • Golden lines – students share the best line from what they are reading at the moment
  • Blessed books – teachers share a short recommendation multiple times per week, including title, plot summary, character descriptions and general thoughts on the book, then place the book front facing on a special shelf. Students are invited to contribute to the blessed books also. I think these strategies could translate to the school library program well. Students could write brief recommendations for books, placing them in pride of place.

Fisher and Frey (2018) also describe the use of mini book clubs for students reading the same text by choice. I think this could be used in library lessons by having pairs of students work together to select books for the other to read, ones that they themselves have read  (or we have multiple copies so they can read it together) in the hope of prompting discussion about what they are reading.

 

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2018). Raise reading volume through access, choice, discussion, and book talks. The Reading Teacher. 72 (1) 89–97

Krashen, Stephen D. (2011). Free voluntary reading. ABC-CLIO, LLC.

 

The Goldilocks Effect

In considering how I read and process information, I find that I enjoy reading fiction on a backlit ereader. I don’t need to refer back to other sections, I progress through the text linearly. I do like to have some method of tracking how far through the book I am, perhaps a scroll bar on the side or similar, as this helps me with predictions about what is going to happen etc. I like having chapters that are easily accessible and allow me to have a sensible stopping point, otherwise I would never sleep. I like that I don’t need to have a lamp on, I can adjust my font size, background colour etc. However, when I am reading non-fiction or non-linear text, I much prefer to have a printed version. In this way, I can annotate what I am reading, take notes easily, refer back to other sections or other texts. I find that I take in the information much better if I read from paper rather than from a screen. I find it interesting that Kamenetz (2018) has identified that the brains of children do actually function differently when experiencing texts differently. She identifies that the brain and the comprehension is most active when children experience illustrated texts read to them. This has always been my preference too and I am pleased to see my own preference backed up by research. I think that there are benefits and disadvantages to all types of text and as teacher librarians, it falls to us to ensure that each student and faculty member has available to them the most appropriate tool for the job in hand. It therefore behooves us to understand the benefits and disadvantages of all formats and presentation modes

 

Kamenetz, A. (2018, May 24). What’s going on in your child’s brain when you read them a story? KQED: MindShift. https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/51281/whats-going-on-in-your-childs-brain-when-you-read-them-a-story

Cross Platform Publishing

What is the impact on the role of the teacher librarian from cross platform publishing?

Sekeres & Watson (2011) discuss the publication of the 39 Clues series by Scholastic. They describe online communities, books, trading cards and a website that were combined in order to tell the story/play the game of the 39 Clues. It was not possible to fully participate in the narrative without participating in all of the publishing platforms offered in the series. This required readers to connect with others, collaborate, and, of course purchase, multiple elements. The readers, according the Sekeres & Watson (2011) were highly engaged with the series. They describe readers wanting to connect socially with other fans of the series through the website and online community. The multi-literacy that is required to do this assumes and at the same time teaches a high level of digital literacy and ability to integrate sources of information. This is a positive skill for students to learn and so, teacher librarians should encourage the learning of these skills. Cullen (2015) Discusses how children are seen as naturally competent and confident users of technology and find it very engaging. It is undoubtedly true that digital technology is engaging and motivating for students, however, whether they are developing the critical ability to think about what they are reading/viewing, to integrate various sources of information and come up with verified information, is less clear.  Cladis (2018) argues that, despite the proliferation of digital texts, students are not reading as attentively or thoroughly as in tiimes past, that while students may be exposed to many hundreds of thousands of words in digital environments, they are not engaging fully with them.

Teacher librarians are in a position in between. We know that students will gain more from reading in a more traditional way, but that they are more inclined to do so when there is a digital and social aspect to their reading. We, as advocates of reading, can harness the power of social and multi-media and use it to channel interest and motivation to reading in a more traditional sense. By using technological tools available, such as Biblionasium, Good Reads, Inside a Dog etc, which engage readers in a social discussion of the books they read, we can augment the traditional methods of reading, adding that engagement and motivating factor.

Reading digitally may be more engaging (Heick, 2020) and so may be a way through for reluctant readers. A “gateway drug” that allows students to gain more benefit than they otherwise would by engaging in digital texts where otherwise they may not be engaging with text at all.

References

Cladis, A. E. (2018) A shifting paradigm: An evaluation of the pervasive effects of digital technologies on language expression, creativity, critical thinking, political discourse, and interactive processes of human communications. E-learning and digital media, 2018-01-30, Vol.17 (5), p.204275301775258-364. SAGE Publications

Cullen, M. (2015, December 21). How is interactive media changing the way children learn. EducationTechnologyhttps://educationtechnologysolutions.com.au/2015/12/how-is-interactive-media-changing-the-way-children-learn/

Heick, T. (2020, July 20). Exactly how technology can make reading better. TeachThought. https://www.teachthought.com/technology/technology-makes-reading-better/
Sekeres, D. C. & Watson, C. (2011). New literacies and multimediacy: The immersive universe of the 39 Clues. Children’s Literature in Education, 42, 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-011-9133-4
.

ETL402: Literature Across the Curriculum

Another subject begins! I am very much looking forward to this subject! I see what expert teacher librarians do and how they interact with teachers and students and I note that one of the key features of the good ones is an almost encyclopedic knowledge of literature, their collection and fresh, current ideas on how they might be used to enhance learning in all parts of the curriculum, not just in English. They common refrain, “It must be great to sit around and read all day!” heard in TL conversations with staff in so many schools is exactly on the money. It would be great! But that’s not what we do. We do and must read widely, deeply and often to explore new literary offerings and identify the applications to the curriculum that new texts have to offer. We must seek out those that should be added to the collection and select those parts of the collection that need to be promoted to teachers and students at the right times. It is my hope that, through this subject I will develop a range of strategies for doing exactly this. I do not need convincing on the value to student learning of great literature. I am a staunch convert already. But I would like to learn about ways to bring my colleagues along with me. Perhaps I will learn about new and various response and analysis activities and how the literature might be used in the classroom in a practical way. I certainly hope that there will be a good amount of practicality involved.

INF447: Research in Practice concluding reflections

This subject has been the hardest so far on my TL journey. I think this is probably due in very large part to the completely new nature of the content. Even when completing my first undergraduate courses, I had some familiarisation with the content because, after all, I had been to school and could remember at least a little of what it was like. Enough to make connections to the content I was being asked to learn. I think I have two key take-aways from this subject. One is a new understanding of reading and interpreting research documents. Understanding that sometimes that which is not published can be as significant as that which is. The design and execution, the methodology chosen and the paradigms underpinning the research available to practitioners carries so much meaning, has taken the researchers time and effort to think out and analyse. Yet it is in analysis of generalisability or transferrability that the true power of INF447 becomes apparent. One must first establish that the topic and content of a piece of research is relevant to the setting in which one works before any of the findings can be usable at all. It seems now that this should be obvious, but I don’t think I could have articulated it before. It is something that I may have noticed after the fact of reading it, but now will be one of the first things I establish deliberately.

The second key take-away will be the effect of the above on the students in my future library. Both as regards the new content and the need to establish relevance of information sought. I have always known that any new content presented to students must be located for them within their general schema of knowledge such that they may make their connections to their lives, to their existing knowledge and to other content presented. I did this naturally in developing my lessons but henceforth I shall make a deliberate point in every lesson of making clear what learning is expected of students and where that new information fits within existing knowledge.

This subject served to point out that information to be learned must be relevant and used in a meaningful way as a direct result of the teaching and learning activities. Looking back, I think this was one of a great many disservices to modern history that were played out in my high school education. Information was presented but its relevance and usefulness was not established and therefore the information was not retained. This must be a cautionary example.

ETL401 Module 3.2

Module 3.2

Are School librarians and endangered species?

Karen Bonanno (Australian School Library Association, 2011) argues that teacher librarians are more valuable than ever, yet they are somewhat invisible. She argues that TLs need to differentiate themselves in the school community. They must identify what it is that they can do or offer that others don’t. Make it visible, necessary. Follow a focus area through until successful. Establish relationships with students, staff and leadership. Show how the work of the TL enhances and develops the general capabilities. In her follow up article, A profession at the tipping point (revisited) (Bonanno 2015) Bonanno adds that TLs must keep abreast of developments in curriculum and pedagogy to ensure that the curriculum is effectively and efficiently resourced, and they can share their knowledge, advocacy and solutions with their colleagues.

 

Compare and contrast the works of Purcell, Herring and Lamb

Dr Purcell (2010) argues that many school staff do not have a clear understanding of the role of the TL and therefore role clarification is necessary. She recommends a time study to provide hard evidence of what the TL is actually doing during the day, and where changes might be made in order to spend more time actively engaging with students and therefore, hopefully having an effect on student learning outcomes. This data, Purcell argues can me used when advocating for the school library program and keeping the Principal and leadership of the school informed about the necessity and impact of the program. Purcell breaks the TL role down into 5 distinct yet interconnected areas: leader, program administrator, instructional partner, information specialist and teacher. She argues that these roles are interconnected – one can not be achieved without the other. Purcell recommends TLs engage in ongoing professional development to ensure their skill set remains up-to-date.

Herring (2007) draws together industry documents from around the world to compare and contrast the mission statements and role statements regarding school libraries and teacher librarians. He states that the learning that happens in the school library should be an extension of that learning that happens in the classroom. He argues that the use of ICTs allows teachers to encourage more active and collaborative learning. Herring suggests that the mission of the school library should be primarily in the development of teaching and learning in the school and secondarily about the provision of resources for that teaching and learning. He describes reading for pleasure as a “small part of the school curriculum” (p29) that is given unnecessary prominence in library mission statements. Herring describes 5 elements of school library mission statements:

  1. Develop effective teaching and learning across the school
  2. Resourcing the curriculum
  3. Provide a suitable learning environment
  4. Promote reading for pleasure and life-long learning
  5. Develop information literate students.

Herring describes the many and varied roles of the TL in schools and suggests that it is not possible to fulfil all of them concurrently, therefore TLs must prioritise according to the needs of the school community. He suggests that the teacher part of the TL’s job is to promote information literacy, promote resource based education and promote reading for understanding and for pleasure. The Librarian part of the job is to organise information for easy access, interpret information systems in the context of curriculum, ensure students are able to use learning resources both within and outside the school and promote independent use of the library for learning. He argues that as library managers, teacher librarians should evaluate the needs of the students and staff, evaluate and develop the collection and related policies, manage the information services and provide a ‘stimulating and helpful environment (ASLA 2003, p62 in Herring 2007, p31).

Herring (2007) discusses the various information literacy models available in the literature. He considers Kuhlthau’s (2004) Information Search Process, Capra and Ryan’s (2001) Information Literacy Planning Overview, Eisenberg and Berkowitz’s (1990) Big 6, Herring’s (2004) PLUS. He suggests that, while there is evidence that teaching information literacy skills using these models does lead to improved student performance (Ryan & Hudson, 2003; Wolf 2003; Herring, 2006), new strategies that include mobile and connected devices will need to be developed.

Herring (2007) discusses the features of a high quality collection development policy. He cites Dillon et al. (2001) who recommend the policy cover:

  • Acquisition policy (not procedure)
  • Criteria for resource selection
  • Evaluation policy and
  • Disputed material policy

Herring (2007) describes the provision of information to students and staff as including reference interviews, selective dissemination of information, development of pathfinders, use of interesting and informative displays. He briefly mentions the importance of collaboration between class teachers and the teacher librarian in developing and effective library website and stresses the importance of on-going professional development, encouraging teacher librarians to remain abreast of changes in technology and pedagogy and act as leaders in their schools in helping teachers to implement change.

Lamb (2011) uses the mnemonic PALETTE to describe the varied roles of the teacher librarian: People, Administration, Learning Electronic information, Technology, Teaching and Environments.  She stresses the importance of forming productive, collaborative relationships with a range of people including teachers, administrators, students and the wider community. These relationships may increasingly be fostered in online environments. Lamb agrees with Herring (2007) that one of the keys to productive, collaborative relationships is in selective dissemination of information. Filtering and targeting information for the particular needs of individuals and communicating that information in a way that is accessible and appealing to that individual. She recommends developing students to be critical thinkers and producers of information rather than merely consumers. While she sees developments in technology as a vital and game-changing advent in the information and education landscapes, she stresses the importance of using that technology as a tool to address other, subject specific knowledge, rather than ICT skills themselves being the goal.

Lamb (2007), Purcell (2010), Valenza (2010) and Herring (2007) all agree on the importance of teacher librarians engaging in ongoing professional development to ensure they remain on the front foot in relation to developments in the information and education landscapes, emerging technologies and pedagogies and innovation. They also agree on the importance of advocacy for the library program with administrators and school leaders who are contending with shrinking budgets and pressure to produce increased student performance.

Herring (2007), Purcell (2010) and Valenza (2010) comment on the many and varied roles of the teacher librarian. Purcell suggests that the roles are interconnected and often misunderstood and so role definition is required. Herring suggests that, as the roles are so varied and numerous, it is not possible to fulfil them all given the resources most school librarian have at their disposal. Prioritisation is therefore required, and that that prioritisation should take account of the needs and goals of the school community. Lamb agrees that the roles are varied and suggests that collaboration with class teachers and the school community is the most important aspect.

Lamb (2007), Purcell (2010), Valenza (2010) and Herring (2007) all comment on the changing information landscape with the advent and continual evolution of digital technologies in schools. They recommend that teacher librarians should be a driving and educating force for both students and teachers in how these new technologies can be used to enhance the educational outcomes of students. Lamb describes a required shift in strategy due to changes in ICT and how these changes affect every part of the teacher librarian’s role. Valenza describes a number of tools that might be utilized to meet the changing and growing demand for digital literacy. While a number of the tools she suggests are somewhat common place now, nine years later, her point is that the teacher librarian, more than any other member of the school community is responsible for seeking out, using and teaching technological developments as they occur.

 

References

Australian School Library Association (ASLA) (2011). A profession at the tipping point: Time to change the game plan. Keynote presentation, Karen Bonanno. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/31003940

Bonanno , K. (2015). A profession at the tipping point (revisited). Access, March, 14-21

Herring, J. (2007). “Teacher librarians and the school library.” Libraries in the twenty-first century: charting new directions in information: 27-42.

Lamb, A. (2011). “Bursting with potential: Mixing a media specialist’s palette.” TechTrends 55(4): 27-36.

Purcell, M. (2010). “All Librarians Do Is Check out Books, Right? A Look at the Roles of a School Library Media Specialist.” Library Media Connection 29(3): 30-33.

Valenza , J. (2010). A revised manifesto. Retrieved from http :// blogs . slj .com/ neverendingsearch /2010/12/03/a-revised-manifesto/