ETL501 Module 1.1 Bloom’s Tools

Module 1.1 invites thought about how the use of Blooms Taxonomy can encourage students to think and learn more deeply about curricular topics. Using a variety of web apps and resources to help students structure and create products of learning can help them to explore issues and topics more deeply and also assist students to learn transferable thinking and technology skills. Using these resources in a team teaching environment, or linking to them in a resource for staff can assist the teacher librarian to act as an instructional leader in technology for staff who may find this area difficult or intimidating. I found it useful to think about the scaffold I would use to assist students to achieve the type of thinking required for each level of Bloom’s Taxonomy, and then search for a web app that could do this digitally, rather than the common approach of having a recommendation for a particular app and trying to fit it into my teaching program. I suspect that one of the considerations I will learn about in this subject is the structuring of pathfinders and such resources in such a way as to include not only resources for locating information, but also for processing and presenting their thinking about that information.

Objective Question  Product of Learning
Resources/Web 2.0 tool
Knowledge What is an ecosystem? Definition Dictionary – print or online or basic textbook, eg. Wordnik, Visuword, …
Comprehension List the different parts of the ecosystem and explain what they do. Simple One way table Microsoft Word, Google Docs
Application Using a diagram, show how the water cycle operates in an ecosystem. Flowchart Diagrams.net
Analysis Contrast the natural water cycle with that used by our community. Venn Diagram https://gitmind.com/
Synthesis Identify an unspoilt ecosystem and design a way of preserving it. Hotspot Image Inabrains.com
Evaluation Is it reasonable that people pollute our waterways? Defend your answer. Podcast/video

Persuasive presentation

Audacity, GarageBand

Filmora

Explain Everything Digital Whiteboard

ETL402 Module 1.1

Image

This module has been all about defining what is meant by “Children’s literature” and discussing the history and development of both literature and childhood. It has focused predominantly on Western culture and the English speaking world. In so many parts of society today, we lament the loss of childhood; see our children growing up too fast, yet childhood, certainly as we know it, is a relatively new idea. In relatively recent times children had little access to literature that was written with them specifically in mind. That literature that was available written specifically for children was predominantly instructive. The idea that children should read instructive texts, come away from reading somewhat improved has not gone away. Many texts are written with the goal of exploring a particular social issue or instructing children on proper ways to behave or helpful ways to think. The historical focus on religion may have shifted more into the political sphere, but much of the literature available and targeted to children (movie tie-ins not withstanding) can be a little preach-y. ConsidCover of "The all new must have orange 430. A cartoon boy holds up a useless, unrecognisable object. His cat looks disdainfully at it. er “The All New Must Have OranThe cover of "enemy pie". A cartoon boy sits atop a latice work pie top. Leaves, caterpillars and bugs are crawling in the piege 430″ by Michael Speechley – an exploration of the dangers of consumerism. Or “A Bad Case of the Stripes” by David Shannon (be yourself) , “Enemy Pie” by  Derek Munson (kindness is desirable), “The cover of "Tilly". A young girl sits on a step in a doorway looking wistfully out of a windowTilly” by Jane Godwin and Anna Walker (things – or people – who are lost to us can be kept alive in our hearts and memories). A great many books for children are written as instructive, improving or persuasive texts. Many are explorations of societal norms, problems or issues. Books written for adults do not miss out on this treatment either, and neither they should. While the improving aspects of children’s literature may be less direct than perhaps it was in the past, it is still an important feature of all literature – it explores the nature and development and state of being of us.

What, then, of the future of literature for children? What will it look like in 5, 10 or 20 years and who will be the drivers of change? The publishing industry in America has already been subject to corporate interference. What is published is what sells. If something does well, more of that will be published. Independent publishers are less and less common, and taking a chance on a new author is just that – quite a big chance. Every day readers have the opportunity to influence the industry very little. However, where independent publishers abound, readers themselves can influence what is published by buying (or demanding their libraries buy) the books they want to read. This can, in turn be influenced by social media reviews such as Goodreads. We may think that electronic formats will be increasingly popular, however it seems that there are still some groups of people and types of texts that prefer the hardcopy. Could it be that there may be an increasing prevalence of ebooks for fiction and hardcopies for non-fiction? Perhaps multi-modal texts will have their time in the sun? Perhaps new technologies will come along that allow readers to view and experience their literature in entirely new ways. I would be interested in a device that used augmented reality goggles to add to the experience of a hardcopy book – such that both the ebook and hardcopy can be viewed independently, but when combined, they offer additional features. As we have seen with app based literature, the additions made by the technology need to add to the reader’s experience of the printed version rather than simply replicate it in order to be most successful. What and exciting and dynamic time to be involved in the world of literature!

ETL505 Module 1

This module introduces the 5 user tasks as set out by IFLA’s Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). These are:

find: to discover that a resource exists within the collection (may result in a list of several possibilities, depending on search terms).

identify: when looking for a known resource, a user identifies the record of that resource and ascertains that it is the one they were looking for.

select: a user doesn’t know exactly what they want, but searches more generally eg by subject, then uses the metadata to choose the resource that best suits their purposes from a list of possible items.

obtain: to access the content of the resource, eg physically locate, download etc. Often achieved by hyperlink for digital resources or call number or instructions for accessing physical items.

explore: when a user finds a record based on its relationship to another, eg from a link within the record of another resource.

These user tasks do not appear to be linear or hierarchical but rather depend on the user’s needs. Different attributes or elements described in the metadata will assist to varying degrees in the search process dependent on the task the user is undertaking.

ETL503: Module 5.1 Collection Evaluation

Module 5 introduces a comprehensive chapter (Johnson, 2014) that deals with the many and various techniques teacher librarians could choose to employ in order to evaluate their collections. Johnson includes all types of libraries in her work, and this provides interesting comparisons with my (admittedly somewhat limited) experience with school libraries. Johnson identifies 11 possible strategies, to which I have added my thoughts on their usefulness in my context:

Evaluation Strategy Description Advantages Disadvantages Usefulness in context
collection profiling A statistical description of the collection at a point in time. It may list information such as a count of titles in a particular section of the collection, a count of titles by imprint year etc Provides baseline data for future collection development activities. Provides quantifiable data for presentation to stakeholders. Can identify areas that need improvement and support budget requests. Does not consider the breadth, condition or quality of the titles counted or how well those titles meet the identified needs of the school community. Collection of this data may be useful as a jumping off point, however, for meaningful evaluation to take place, complementary strategies would need to be employed.
list checking Librarians check items held against a trusted list of quality resources. Simple to apply. Lists are available that are relevant to many contexts. Credible and reliable lists are assured by the reputation of those compiling them. Lists used must be relevant to the specific context. Lists must be regularly updated. If a suitable list could be obtained that matched the specific context, this is a useful technique. This strategy could be combined with circulation analysis and curriculum/collection mapping
direct collection analysis A person who is familiar with what a quality collection includes in a particular field physically inspects the resources provided to meet those needs. Useful when the collection or scope is small. The physical state of the collection can be ascertained and plans for repair, replacement or augmentation framed. Useful for evaluating several aspects of the collection at once Only considers the condition of the resources actually on the shelf at the time. Best suited to small, narrow collections. Librarians might not be objective. To some extent, this is done in primary school libraries each year during stocktake.
comparative statistics Comparison of various vital statistics with those of a trusted, aspirational model. May include collection size, materials expenditure, staffing levels, etc Can assist in identifying the relative strengths and weaknesses of the collection. Data is readily available and quantitative comparisons simple to draw. Numerical counts can not measure quality or the extent to which the resources counted meet the identified needs of users. This sort of evaluation provides limited useful information in a primary school setting.
application of standards Collection and resource standards are compared with the current collection to determine the extent to which the collection meets the relevant standard. Clear areas of strength, weakness and non-strength can be identified and strategies extrapolated to move forward. Standards are the result of opinion. Different circumstances and contexts might require different standards (meaning they are no longer exactly “standard”). If a suitable set of standards could be sourced, this would be an interesting activity to undertake. I would assess one element or section at a time in order to improve the overall library experience over time.
citation studies Similar to list checking, librarians look for commonly cited texts in a particular field and then determine whether those titles are available in the collection. Identifies items for selection consideration. Data is readily available. Lists of commonly cited texts can be difficult to attain in the primary setting. Teacher librarians could study student bibliographies, however, this will be heavily weighted in favour of items that are present in the collection. In the primary school setting, citation of fiction texts is much less common than citation of non-fiction. Students may struggle to identify quality sources, so citations may be weighted in favour of what is already available. It may be difficult to seek citation aggregates from the wider community in this age group. List checking might be a more valuable tool in this area.
circulation studies Provides data about how frequently resources are circulated by interrogating LMS. Indicates that particular titles are being heavily used and may need additional copies purchased, or that resources are not being circulated. Can be used to compare patterns of usage and possible changing community needs. A negative circulation record does not indicate why the resource is not being borrowed. A positive circulation record only shows the resource is being borrowed, not how it is being used. Does not consider items that are not present in the collection, but desired by users. This data forms a valuable starting point and points to areas for further investigation, but is not conclusive in and of itself.
in-house studies Gathers data about resources that are used on site but not borrowed. Captures information missing from circulation studies. May interfere with user privacy perceptions. Only captures data about resources located, does not include unsuccessful searches. Requires all resources used onsite to be retrieved or reshelved by staff, which, given the available staffing levels, is not realistic in the primary school setting.
user surveys and focus groups Users are asked for feedback on target areas. Responses are analysed and aggregated. Can help to identify areas in which needs are not met. Data collected can be both quantitative and qualitative. Does not capture the feedback of non-users. Users might not have a sophisticated understanding of what a quality collection should be like. Users may be unaware that their intended uses and actual behaviours may vary. Structuring effective survey questions can be difficult. This could be an effective strategy for a primary school setting if care is taken to include a cross-section of the school community in the survey/focus groups.
interlibrary requests A user who checks the catalogue for a particular item, finds it absent and decides they still need it, might request the item from a partner library. Statistics can be obtained allowing librarians to study patterns in the requests. Could help identify resources for selection consideration. Gathering of statistics is simple. Any changes in this area could indicate a shift in user community needs. Does not capture users who go elsewhere to find required resources. Relies on inter-library loans being available. As primary school libraries are usually stand-alone entities, interlibrary loans are not common.
document delivery test Library staff simulate users. First, determine whether the library holds a particular item on a citation list, then go get it. See how long it takes to supply the target item. Provides an objective measure of the libraries ability to meet the needs of users. May identify issues relating to cataloguing or collection management. Library staff are more familiar with the collection than most users, so this test may not show up some issues. Compiling a list of representative titles can be challenging. This could be an interesting strategy for evaluating the fiction and junior fiction collections as students are often looking for particular titles or authors. In the primary school setting, users tend to seek non-fiction resources on specific topics rather than individual titles, so it might be more beneficial to take a collection mapping approach in this area.

 

Reference

Johnson, P. (2014). Fundamentals of collection development and management [American Library Association version]. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/lib/csuau/reader.action?docID=1711419&ppg=312

ETL503 Module 3 – Acquisition and Accessioning

Module 3 discusses important aspects of acquiring and accessioning resources for the school library. Firstly budgeting is considered. Secondly acquisitions workflow and finally licensing arrangements for digital resources.

Section 1 encourages us to think about the budgeting procedures in our libraries. Sufficient funds are needed to purchase resources selected for inclusion, and to maintain a balanced collection. Teacher librarians are responsible for the considered use of funds available, and are sometimes to be involved in the setting of those budgets with the school leadership. In my school library, the teacher librarian sets out a list of requests for the following year’s budget, and this is then considered by the Principal and SAM in conjunction with the requirements of all the other programs operating within the school.

In section 2 we are encouraged to evaluate library suppliers and consider the features one should look for in developing a working relationship with a particular supplier. Possible outsourcing activities are also considered. Some suppliers offer pre-curated and selected collections. Some offer shelf-ready books, some offer downloadable MARC records etc. In my library, we use downloadable SCIS records for cataloging, and Australian Standing Orders for general collection building. It is important to review subscriptions such as the Standing Orders regularly. This particular service is offered by a specific publisher and exclusively provides content from that publisher. While the selections included are usually quality resources that do meet the needs of the school community, it is important to also consider the offerings of other suppliers.

In section 3: e-resources, we are encouraged to read about and ask questions such as:

  • Can I use this in a school?
  • Can I copy this content and distribute to multiple devices? How many copies? Can users distribute the content? Am I liable if they do?
  • Can I convert this content into a different format?
  • Can I share it with another school, eg interlibrary loan?
  • Will I own this content if I stop subscribing? What if the publisher removes it from sale? What if the content is superseded by a newer version of itself?
  • Can I preview this content, or receive a refund if it is not what I was led to believe

Selection and deselection – ETL503 Module 2

Probably the most well known and yet misunderstood aspect of the role of the teacher librarian is deselection. We’ve all been asked, “You’re throwing out books?” in a horrified tone by well meaning teachers and parents. My favourite response at the moment is, “Yes. Do you want it?” Invariably the answer is in the negative. I work in a school library, not a museum or archive. Shelf space is at a premium and it is the job of the teacher librarian to ensure that only quality, relevant material is taking up the valuable shelf real estate. Resources that are covered in 3 feet of dust but otherwise pristine are not being used. This prompts an investigation: why are they not being used? Are they poor quality? Irrelevant? Difficult to find? Unattractive? Teacher librarians are then faced with three choices: promote it, weed it or change the location (move, clean/tidy around it, decorate it to draw attention). A stocktake is a good opportunity to discover resources in this position. When looking at, scanning and cleaning every book, teacher librarians can take the opportunity to remove any resources that no longer meet the teaching and learning needs of the school community. It takes a certain amount of bravery to weed a large collection especially if it has not been done for a long time. My library has designated a “shelf of shame” in the library office to help deal with this situation with humour and provide a little education for teachers and parents who ask the questions I mentioned at the beginning of this post. It is stocked with recently weeded gems that demonstrate clearly why this is needed. One look through and people have a good laugh and understand.

In module 2 we learn that collection development involves:

  • an assessment of community needs
  • an assessment of how well the current collection meets those needs
  • development or revision of selection criteria
  • identification of resources that will improve the way community needs are met
  • selection of the best and most relevant of those resources for purchase
  • acquisition of selected resources
  • processing of resources to make them shelf ready
  • circulation
  • deselection of resources that no longer meet the needs of the school community.

We are pointed to the work of Hughes-Hassell and Mancall (2005), Johnson (2009) and Kimmel (2014).

We learn that teacher librarians use selection aids to assist in identifying resources to meet needs. Many are listed in section 2.4 of the module. Care must be taken to ensure reviews relied upon are objective, accurate and contain information about the resource such as the intended audience, reading level required, themes and potentially controversial elements (eg language, complex themes). The section of the module that deals with censorship encourages trainee teacher librarians not to self-censor controversial materials, but, in the interests of developing a balanced and diverse collection, be aware of themes or elements of resources that may be potentially offensive and make the deliberate choice of whether or not to include them. Not all selection aids will include this information.

The specific selection criteria used will be determined in response to the individual needs of the school community it serves (Keeling, 2019). Module 2.5 provides a sample selection criteria from Hughes-Hassell and Mancall (2005). These general criteria must be revised and customised for the individual circumstances. Once written into the Collection Development Policy for the school library, selection criteria must be regularly reviewed to ensure they remain relevant to ever-changing educational contexts.

References

Hughes-Hassell, S. & Mancall, J. (2005). Collection management for youth: responding to the needs of learners. Chicago: ALA Editions.

Johnson, P. (2009). Fundamentals of collection development and management [American Library Association version].

Keeling, M. (2019). What’s new in collection development? Knowledge Quest, 48(2), 4-5. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/docview/2311879567?accountid=10344

Kimmel, S.C. (2014). Developing collections to empower learners. [American Library Association version].

ETL503: Module 1 Collection Development and Management

Module 1 provides some useful comments regarding the nature of collection development and highlights that there is some debate as to whether collection development and collection management are the same, different processes or two parts of a larger whole. My view at this very early stage of the subject is that collection development describes the future of the collection and how the teacher librarian intends to work towards that vision. Collection management, I see more as the day to day managing, organizing, processing etc of the collection as it currently stands. Of course these are two parts of a larger whole: resource provision. There are other parts of this whole as well – making the resources accessible and discoverable to those who need them, sharing ideas about how a resource could be used, guiding users to other resources that might confirm or challenge the ideas presented in a chosen resource, teaching students (and sometimes staff) how to locate, analyse and use resources, and more and more and more. I hope that these parts of the whole will be addressed throughout the course, however, I expect this subject will focus mostly on collection development and collection management.

So far, collection development has been defined by authors such as Corrall (2018), Van Zijl (2005), Queensland Department of Education and Training (2012), ALA (1998) and Kimmell (2014) who broadly agree that it is an assessment of needs, selection of materials to meet those needs, budgeting and acquisition of identified resources, evaluation of existing resources and deselection, where appropriate, of resources that are no longer meeting the learning and teaching needs of students, teachers and the school community. I am aware that there are several tools and models for criteria a teacher librarian might use in the selection and deselection processes, though I am yet to learn the specifics of them and which is most appropriate for my school library context. I look forward to learning more about them through this subject.

References

Corrall, S. (2018).  The concept of collection development in the digital world. In M. Fieldhouse & A. Marshall (Eds.),  Collection development in the digital Age (1st ed., pp. 3–24). https://doi.org/10.290/9781856048972.003
Kimmel, S.C. (2014)  Developing collections to empower learners , American Library Association, 2014. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/csuau/detail.action?docID=1687658.
Van Zijl, C.W. (2005). Developing and managing information collections for academics and researchers at a university of technology : a case study. Pretoria: University of South Africa. Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/1363

ETL401 Module 5.1

Defining Information Literacy

Information literacy is the bread and butter of the teacher librarian. There are many definitions of information literacy. They fall into two broad categories: the behaviourists and the socioculturalists. The behaviourists believe that information literacy is a set of observable skills that can be learned and assessed. The socioculturalists believe that the most important aspect is the context of the information need and that the actual behaviours utilised will vary depending on the social context in which the information need arises. (Combes, Fitzgerald, & O’Connell, 2019).

Behrens (1994) explains that understanding of information literacy developed from the 1970s, when it was described merely as knowing the techniques and skills for using information tools to solve problems (IIA 1979), through the 1980s when the actual skills were defined and described as recognising a need for information, locating it, evaluating it, organising it and using it effectively to solve problems or make decisions, and into the early 1990s where it became seen as part of a broader definition of literacy, and the importance of a co-operative approach to the teaching of information literacy between librarians and teachers was established. The following is a summary of her article: Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322. All references are cited therein.

1970s

Zurkowski (1974) says that people who are information literate have learned the skills for using a wide range of information tools and primary sources in developing information-solutions to problems.

Burchinal (1976) introduces the idea that efficiency and effectiveness in the use of information is important for information literacy and states that there is a set of skills required in locating and using information for problem solving and decision making. However, he stops short of describing what those skills actually are.

Hamelink (1976) focuses on critical thinking and individual interpretation of news events, describing the need for citizens to draw their own conclusions about current events rather than rely on the explanations given by “Institutionalised public media”

IIA (1979) removed the idea that information literacy only applied in the workplace, describing an information literate as a “Person who knows the techniques and skills for using information tools in molding solutions to problems.”

1980s

IIA (1982) linked the ability and willingness of people to use new technologies with the ability to access information, arguing that the “information naïve” (those unable or unwilling to use the technology) had limited access to information.

Horton (1982) described computer literacy as understanding the abilities and limitations of the new technology, but wrote that information literacy goes beyond computer literacy. It involves increasing awareness of the knowledge explosion and the ways in which computer aided handling technologies might help to identify, access and obtain sources of information.

Demo (1986) stated that information literacy forms the common pre-requisite for life-long learning.

Tessmer (1985) argued that information literacy extends beyond locating information to include understanding and evaluating the information located.

Kuhlthau (1987) wrote that information literacy involves recognising a need for information, locating that information, managing large amounts of information and keeping uptodate with new developments in technology as they became available.

Olsen and Coons (1989) described information literacy as having the ability to locate, retrieve, generate, manipulate and use information in decision making, utilizing electronic processes.

Breivik (1987) included references to developing information technologies in her description of information literacy as acquiring, evaluating, storing, manipulating and producing information.

Breivik and Gee (1989) believe that the library has a vital role to play in developing life long learners within the undergraduate cohort, arguing that the library and librarians provides the opportunity and skills for specialised, field-specific knowledge to be generalised and applied to real-world problems and contexts. They considered that the teaching of information literacy was a whole community responsibility; including the library, whole university and wider community under this umbrella.

ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989) produced perhaps the most widely acknowledged definition of information literacy, stating that “In order to be information literate, a person must recognise that information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate and use effectively the needed information.” They added organising the needed information once it is found.

1990s

Campbell (1990) describes literacy as the “integration of listening, speaking, reading, writing and critical thinking”. She includes in her description numeracy and the cultural knowledge that allows a literate person to choose and understand language appropriate to a particular situation. She argues that literacy allows people to use language to enhance their ability to think, create and question.

Breivik (1991) argues that a partnership between librarians and teachers can allow for complementary assistance in providing resource-based learning

References

Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322.

Combes, B., Fitzgerald, L. and O’Connell, J. (2019). Information Literacy. In ETL401: Introduction to Teacher Librarianship. Retrieved from https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899468_1

ETL401 Module 3.3

Collaboration

Haycock (2007) identifies collaboration as a key priority for teacher librarians. He discusses non-monetary expectations that principals set that impact on school culture, citing Tallman and Van Deusen (1994) who found that collaborative planning among teachers and teacher librarians was more likely to occur when the principal expected team planning. Haycock further argues that those teachers who collaborate with the teacher librarian develop a keener appreciation for the role and are more likely to do so again, contributing to the tradition of collaboration within the school. Haycock points to communication, mutual trust and respect, shared vision for leadership and favourable structures such as flexible scheduling as vital features of successful collaboration between teachers and the teacher librarian.

Haycock (2007) suggests that a shared vision for the school between the teacher librarian and the principal will enhance the success of the library program. Kachel (2017) agrees, arguing that a favourable opinion of the library program held by the principal is important to ensure the longevity of the program. Kachel further argues that this favourable opinion might be encouraged by the teacher librarian by demonstrating to the principal that the library program in contributing to the principal’s goals and vision for the school as a whole.

The school principal can influence the library program by offering sufficient funding for resources, staff and materials, by setting expectations of collaborative practice and by allowing and facilitating administrative structures such as flexible scheduling. The teacher librarian can support the vision of the school principal by contributing to the educational program positively and collaboratively, working with teachers and students to deliver quality information literacy, critical thinking and wide reading programs and ensuring the school has high quality, relevant resources available to teachers and that teachers are aware of the resources and how they might be used with students.

References

Haycock, K. (2007). Collaboration: Critical success factors for student learning. School Libraries Worldwide, 13(1), 25.

Kachel, D. (2017). The principal and the librarian: Positioning the school library program. Teacher Librarian, 45(1), 50-63.

Tallman, J., & van Deusen, J. D. (1994). Collaborative unit planning-Schedule, time, and participants: The 1993-94 AASL/Highsmith Research Award Study Part Three. School Library Media Quarterly, 23, 33-37. Cited in Haycock, K. (2007). Collaboration: Critical success factors for student learning. School Libraries Worldwide, 13(1), 25.

ETL401 Module 3.2

Module 3.2

Are School librarians and endangered species?

Karen Bonanno (Australian School Library Association, 2011) argues that teacher librarians are more valuable than ever, yet they are somewhat invisible. She argues that TLs need to differentiate themselves in the school community. They must identify what it is that they can do or offer that others don’t. Make it visible, necessary. Follow a focus area through until successful. Establish relationships with students, staff and leadership. Show how the work of the TL enhances and develops the general capabilities. In her follow up article, A profession at the tipping point (revisited) (Bonanno 2015) Bonanno adds that TLs must keep abreast of developments in curriculum and pedagogy to ensure that the curriculum is effectively and efficiently resourced, and they can share their knowledge, advocacy and solutions with their colleagues.

 

Compare and contrast the works of Purcell, Herring and Lamb

Dr Purcell (2010) argues that many school staff do not have a clear understanding of the role of the TL and therefore role clarification is necessary. She recommends a time study to provide hard evidence of what the TL is actually doing during the day, and where changes might be made in order to spend more time actively engaging with students and therefore, hopefully having an effect on student learning outcomes. This data, Purcell argues can me used when advocating for the school library program and keeping the Principal and leadership of the school informed about the necessity and impact of the program. Purcell breaks the TL role down into 5 distinct yet interconnected areas: leader, program administrator, instructional partner, information specialist and teacher. She argues that these roles are interconnected – one can not be achieved without the other. Purcell recommends TLs engage in ongoing professional development to ensure their skill set remains up-to-date.

Herring (2007) draws together industry documents from around the world to compare and contrast the mission statements and role statements regarding school libraries and teacher librarians. He states that the learning that happens in the school library should be an extension of that learning that happens in the classroom. He argues that the use of ICTs allows teachers to encourage more active and collaborative learning. Herring suggests that the mission of the school library should be primarily in the development of teaching and learning in the school and secondarily about the provision of resources for that teaching and learning. He describes reading for pleasure as a “small part of the school curriculum” (p29) that is given unnecessary prominence in library mission statements. Herring describes 5 elements of school library mission statements:

  1. Develop effective teaching and learning across the school
  2. Resourcing the curriculum
  3. Provide a suitable learning environment
  4. Promote reading for pleasure and life-long learning
  5. Develop information literate students.

Herring describes the many and varied roles of the TL in schools and suggests that it is not possible to fulfil all of them concurrently, therefore TLs must prioritise according to the needs of the school community. He suggests that the teacher part of the TL’s job is to promote information literacy, promote resource based education and promote reading for understanding and for pleasure. The Librarian part of the job is to organise information for easy access, interpret information systems in the context of curriculum, ensure students are able to use learning resources both within and outside the school and promote independent use of the library for learning. He argues that as library managers, teacher librarians should evaluate the needs of the students and staff, evaluate and develop the collection and related policies, manage the information services and provide a ‘stimulating and helpful environment (ASLA 2003, p62 in Herring 2007, p31).

Herring (2007) discusses the various information literacy models available in the literature. He considers Kuhlthau’s (2004) Information Search Process, Capra and Ryan’s (2001) Information Literacy Planning Overview, Eisenberg and Berkowitz’s (1990) Big 6, Herring’s (2004) PLUS. He suggests that, while there is evidence that teaching information literacy skills using these models does lead to improved student performance (Ryan & Hudson, 2003; Wolf 2003; Herring, 2006), new strategies that include mobile and connected devices will need to be developed.

Herring (2007) discusses the features of a high quality collection development policy. He cites Dillon et al. (2001) who recommend the policy cover:

  • Acquisition policy (not procedure)
  • Criteria for resource selection
  • Evaluation policy and
  • Disputed material policy

Herring (2007) describes the provision of information to students and staff as including reference interviews, selective dissemination of information, development of pathfinders, use of interesting and informative displays. He briefly mentions the importance of collaboration between class teachers and the teacher librarian in developing and effective library website and stresses the importance of on-going professional development, encouraging teacher librarians to remain abreast of changes in technology and pedagogy and act as leaders in their schools in helping teachers to implement change.

Lamb (2011) uses the mnemonic PALETTE to describe the varied roles of the teacher librarian: People, Administration, Learning Electronic information, Technology, Teaching and Environments.  She stresses the importance of forming productive, collaborative relationships with a range of people including teachers, administrators, students and the wider community. These relationships may increasingly be fostered in online environments. Lamb agrees with Herring (2007) that one of the keys to productive, collaborative relationships is in selective dissemination of information. Filtering and targeting information for the particular needs of individuals and communicating that information in a way that is accessible and appealing to that individual. She recommends developing students to be critical thinkers and producers of information rather than merely consumers. While she sees developments in technology as a vital and game-changing advent in the information and education landscapes, she stresses the importance of using that technology as a tool to address other, subject specific knowledge, rather than ICT skills themselves being the goal.

Lamb (2007), Purcell (2010), Valenza (2010) and Herring (2007) all agree on the importance of teacher librarians engaging in ongoing professional development to ensure they remain on the front foot in relation to developments in the information and education landscapes, emerging technologies and pedagogies and innovation. They also agree on the importance of advocacy for the library program with administrators and school leaders who are contending with shrinking budgets and pressure to produce increased student performance.

Herring (2007), Purcell (2010) and Valenza (2010) comment on the many and varied roles of the teacher librarian. Purcell suggests that the roles are interconnected and often misunderstood and so role definition is required. Herring suggests that, as the roles are so varied and numerous, it is not possible to fulfil them all given the resources most school librarian have at their disposal. Prioritisation is therefore required, and that that prioritisation should take account of the needs and goals of the school community. Lamb agrees that the roles are varied and suggests that collaboration with class teachers and the school community is the most important aspect.

Lamb (2007), Purcell (2010), Valenza (2010) and Herring (2007) all comment on the changing information landscape with the advent and continual evolution of digital technologies in schools. They recommend that teacher librarians should be a driving and educating force for both students and teachers in how these new technologies can be used to enhance the educational outcomes of students. Lamb describes a required shift in strategy due to changes in ICT and how these changes affect every part of the teacher librarian’s role. Valenza describes a number of tools that might be utilized to meet the changing and growing demand for digital literacy. While a number of the tools she suggests are somewhat common place now, nine years later, her point is that the teacher librarian, more than any other member of the school community is responsible for seeking out, using and teaching technological developments as they occur.

 

References

Australian School Library Association (ASLA) (2011). A profession at the tipping point: Time to change the game plan. Keynote presentation, Karen Bonanno. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/31003940

Bonanno , K. (2015). A profession at the tipping point (revisited). Access, March, 14-21

Herring, J. (2007). “Teacher librarians and the school library.” Libraries in the twenty-first century: charting new directions in information: 27-42.

Lamb, A. (2011). “Bursting with potential: Mixing a media specialist’s palette.” TechTrends 55(4): 27-36.

Purcell, M. (2010). “All Librarians Do Is Check out Books, Right? A Look at the Roles of a School Library Media Specialist.” Library Media Connection 29(3): 30-33.

Valenza , J. (2010). A revised manifesto. Retrieved from http :// blogs . slj .com/ neverendingsearch /2010/12/03/a-revised-manifesto/