The Importance of Collection Development Policies

The Importance of Collection Development Policies

Schools need to develop policies that reflect the values of the school and communicate the stance that the school takes on a particular topic or area. They often come into play on a day-to-day basis, and therefore it is really important that they are kept up to date so that they remain relevant to the community that they apply to. Where policy does not exist, it creates issues into the future as to how to deal with certain issues. For instance, in the context of a collection development policy in the library, if the policy were only to “exist in the head of the incumbent teacher librarian and when that person is gone/absent so is the knowledge” (Module 6.1). A collection development policy (CDP) provides teacher librarians with a working document that allows them to manage the collection in accordance with the underpinning principals of being open, accountable and ethical in their decision-making relating to the library collection. It is important to be able to be transparent, and to make conscious and systematic decisions that can be backed by the CDP so that questioning by stakeholders in relation to censorship, money and other issues can be answered and supported by documentation.

Being able to manage the collection effectively and efficiently ensures the community that the library serves is provided with resources that are relevant, engaging and suitable. It is crucial that the collection is managed with the support of CDP documentation to ensure effective conduct.

Collection Methods

Collection Methods

When analysing data to inform decisions, it is often important to include quantitative and qualitative methods to get a holistic picture. Such is the case when analysing the resource collection in a library and making decisions based upon the data to manage resources.

The following quantitative methods would provide robust data to assist in auditing school library resources:

  1. For print resources, using the library management system (LMS) to gauge borrowing statistics, as well as collection size and growth. Such data may inform the weeding of resources that have not been borrowed or used in certain time parameters (the criteria would be set by the TL for this).
  2. Depending on budgetary requirements, content overlap studies may be useful to investigate resources that cover content across more that one curriculum area.

Qualitative methods that provide further important insight into the collection are:

  1. User opinions via survey and discussion with students, teachers and the wider school body.
  2. Collection mapping if time allows – looking at the school curriculum and mapping out which areas are supported by resources, and which areas require resources.

Further to these ideas, I really liked the idea presented by Jevanord (2021) where, with the use of a rubric that had to justify a book’s removal based on age, relevance etc., the students were “given the gardening gloves” for weeding the books. Students developed a much greater understanding of the collection in the library, and the TL developed a greater understanding of the needs and interests of the users.

References

Jevanord, J. (2021, April 13). Weeding library books: A brilliant strategy. Library Learners. https://librarylearners.com/weeding-library-books