This is a reflection on a semester well spent. A semester not without its own ups and downs. A semester of lockdowns and digital classrooms. A semester of learning.
The main takeaway from this semester has been the critical role of Information Literacy (IL).
Why?
UNESCO defines IL as “essential for individuals to achieve personal, social, occupational and educational goals” (UNESCO, 2008, p. 9). A set of skills enabling students to become learners for life; information consumers and creators (UNESCO, 2008, p. 9).
As an IB educator, when I found out that in ETL-401 we would be learning about inquiry learning, my initial thought was I know this. Kath Murdoch practically invented it. This should be easy. Start with a provocation, get the students interested, then once they’re hooked, give them their research task and let them go. The truth is I thought Kath Murdoch did invent inquiry learning. You can read about my initial reactions to inquiry based learning here.
I soon found out I was wrong. Inquiry learning is not that simple, and unfortunately I have let students down. In my professional life as a Spanish and English teacher, prior to being a teacher librarian (TL) I often came across google, copy-paste assignments. Something was missing, yet I couldn’t figure it out, as some students were able to deliver excellent assignments, whilst others became terribly overwhelmed with the abundance of information and varying ideas and opinions.
[Enter stage left] Information Literacy.
Now things started clicking into place. The abundance of information and varying opinions requires a new skillset. One I had previously not come across, developed to help students become information literate learners. As Behrens (1994, p. 312) states, IL gives students the best skills in order to thrive in the information age (Behrens, 1994, p. 312).
This IL is the set of skills and processes; the higher order analysis, critical thinking and problem solving skills that teache a student to become an independent, critical thinker (Lupton 2004, cited in Lupton et al., 2004, p. 1). One that can take skills and processes from one scenario or subject and apply it to a new scenario.
These are skills I failed to teach my students. My unawareness of IL and the feelings and thoughts that an oversupply of contradicting information led to google, copy-paste assignments. I created what Maniotes and Kuhlthau (2014) refer to as a “traditional research assignment”. I simply didn’t know better.
I have also discovered the multitude of inquiry learning models, from Project Based Learning (PBL) from the Buck institute, to Guided Inquiry (GI) by Kuhlthau et al. (2012). PBL guides students through ‘real life learning scenarios’ much like what you would come across in the workplace. Whereas GI when paired with the ISP (Kuhlthau, 2007) provides students with a very structured approach to Information Literacy (IL) and the skills associated with it. In hindsight, my students would have greatly benefited from this approach.
I like two of the IL models I’ve explored this semester; the New South Wales Education (NSW ED) Information Search Process (ISP) (NSW ED, 2007) and GI (Kuhlthau et al., 2012). In a post to the discussion forum 5.3b: Guided Inquiry, I wrote about the two main benefits to GI. Firstly in helping teachers identify the feelings, thoughts and actions of the students throughout the inquiry, thus allowing more opportunity for intervention and redirection. Secondly the expectation within the model for continuous reflection.
When looking through the lens of an IL model, inquiry learning becomes far more structured than a simple, ‘get them interested and let them have at it’. I know there are other IL models, however GI by Kuhlthau et al. is currently the best fit for my purposes. To conclude, I reflect on my previous practice and can see room for vast improvement. As a TL I can model and guide best IL and inquiry practice for beginning teachers.
References
Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322.
Kuhlthau, C.C, Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2012). Guided inquiry design: A framework for inquiry in your school. Libraries Unlimited. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/csuau/detail.action?docID=1887925
Lupton, M., Glanville, C., McDonald, P., Selzer, D. (2004). Information literacy toolkit. Griffith University.
Maniotes, L. K., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8-17. https://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/docview/1620878836?accountid=10344
NSW Department of Education and Training. (2007). Information skills in the school. https://nthsyddem-p.schools.nsw.gov.au/learning-at-our-school/library/information-process.html