Deeper and Deeper

Link

The process of reflection is one that has immediately conjured up images of tall mountains above deep bodies of water. To me, the mountains in all their beauty are what I have seen at the beginning of this study process, beautiful of themselves, but yet unexplored by me. The body of water and subsequent reflection remind me of the depth of knowledge which has come from the study undertaken in ETL401.

When commencing this subject, I had naively thought that having worked closely with a number of Teacher Librarians (TL) I had an understanding of what the role completely entailed. In my initial blogpost (Marreiros, 2021, March 12) I stated that the role of TL could be seen alongside a previously held role of Preschool teacher in looking through an Inquiry lens. Since then, I have come to believe that, while there are definite similarities, my understanding of Inquiry learning models which cater for up to year 12 and beyond has increased exponentially. My understanding of the role of TL as a potential driver of Inquiry learning has been stretched.

My appreciation of the role of a TL in Inquiry Learning has gone from one where I thought that they were hopefully part of the process to one where I believe it is essential that a trained TL is part of the process. As I discussed in Module 4.1b (Marreiros, 2021, May 1), the expectations of the school culture, Principal and teachers’ mindset all come into play with engaging a school in authentic Inquiry learning and I strongly believe that an enthusiastic, knowledgeable TL can, and should be a driving force in encouraging the school to collaboratively plan for Inquiry Learning. While there can be many challenges along the way, the opportunities which can be had for a TL in looking at Inquiry learning within the Australian Curriculum are great (Lupton, 2012). A TL has an opportunity to focus on the General Capabilities of the Australian Curriculum, looking at life skills essential for the learners of today. For example, while a History teacher has certain content which has to be covered within their teaching, a TL can enhance this learning by being able to specifically focus on the ICT search skills or plagiarism lessons and how to avoid not referencing a source (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority, n.d.).

Of course, in looking at Inquiry Learning, it is now impossible to not think of Information Literacy as a key component of why Inquiry learning is so effective. From Module 2 where the TLs role was beginning to be looked at through the lens of Information Specialist (Marreiros, 2021, March 19) my understanding of Information Literacy is still being developed. Even back in March I was reflecting on how the misinformation and information overload could be explicitly taught to children (Marreiros, 2021, March 18), but since then I realise that to be able to having Information Literacy means that you are able to put a filter in your own learning and find the relevant information, while sifting out that which is not needed (Marreiros, 2021, May 13a). While not expressing myself as eloquently as I would have liked, my growing understanding of exactly what Information Literacy is, has led me to begin conversations with my own school’s Principal which will hopefully be the start of my current school looking at how to enhance Information Literacy Skills.

One key way which enhancing Information Literacy is through the use of Inquiry, and I believe to effectively do this using an Inquiry Learning Model is key to doing this successfully. In Module 5, while exploring the use of Inquiry Learning Models it became clearer to me that while there are challenges in starting a new process for guiding inquiry in schools, using a model can make the task less daunting for teaching staff. As I expressed in a previous blog post (Marreiros, 2021, May 13b), while it can take time to set up, Inquiry Learning models allow for the process of the skills and dispositions, not just knowledge acquisition, to form. This is, of course, what is needed to have a life-long learning outlook.

As a life-long learner here, my next question is, where to next with this newfound understanding?

References:

Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d.). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Capability. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/information-and-communication-technology-ict-capability/

Lupton, M. (2012) Inquiry skills in the Australian Curriculum V6. Access, 28(4), 8-29.

 

Brain Training – Learner in Process

Throughout the readings I have tackled so far in investigating Guided Inquiry (GI), one key aspect has stood out: inquiry is a process, not just an end product. Garrison and FitzGerald (2017) showcase this in their study of students who have been through a process of inquiry projects over a year long period. Students reflected on what they had gained from the process and stated that the development of research skills in specific areas had been honed; such as their ability to search generally at first, then become more specific as the research process proceeds, as well as analyse the question before commencing research (Garrison & Fitzgerald, 2017, para 13).

With this research in mind, initiating and maintaining a GI approach to learning within a school is one which cannot be done alone. A TL can certainly be a driving factor in championing this meaningful learning, but must firstly have a team of people onboard with them. The support of the Principal and Executive of the school is a must as they greatly influence the culture of the school. A TL needs to take on many attitudes to leadership to move a school towards integrate information literacy instruction. Firstly it requires upfront leadership to provide the evidence and potential pathway forward to executive if they are needing to be convinced of the benefit of GI. Secondly, a TL needs to take a leadership position of leading from the middle, by being willing and available to collaboratively work with colleagues in setting up the planning and guidance required for GI planning.

It has been said that change takes time, which is one of the challenges which TLs may come across in trying to engage in a GI process: time to meet up and plan with colleagues, time for students to spend in both the library or information literacy rich environment, time to engage with school executive to drive the future direction of the school, time to build relationship with staff both for and against a change in the way things have been done.

Time - the spiral that seems to be against us.

“…Time…” by ĐāżŦ {mostly absent} is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Resistance is another key element which TLs and teachers need to be able to push against. As a classroom teacher who is currently looking at the scientific concept of forces, it has caused me to think about the resistance which I think is more commonly happening in schools today. From my current primary teaching experience, there are many students (and teachers) who want specific quantifiable products to show that they have learnt and don’t really want the process to be part of the design. There seems to be a resistance amongst students to creating their own lines of investigation. This is where a passionate, ever-learning TL can make the world of difference, showcasing that skills are transferable amongst different curriculum areas – research skills which are used in an inquiry about a geographical question can be used in researching what roles a student could play in creating a school musical production.  Ultimately it is the skills, not the knowledge which the TL is and should be focusing on.

Reference:

Garrison, K. & Fitzgerald, L. (2017). ‘It trains your brain’: Student reflections on using the guided inquiry process. Synergy, 15(2)

Consilio non impetu

The Clan Agnew flag consists of an important motto – “Consilio non impetu” which when translated says “By wisdom not by force” (Young, 2004). This motto is one which has kept popping into my mind (the English translation of course!) due to my growing understanding of how to change things. A TL needs to take on such a motto to look at their approach to effecting change from within their role in a school setting.

While it might be stating the obvious, a teacher librarian comes into the role of TL with the 2 different specialities, one being librarian and the other teacher. In looking through the second speciality mentioned they should hopefully have experience in planning for teaching experiences which meet the curriculum. In my opinion, it can only enrich a school’s curriculum offering when there is a staff member who can not only look at the curriculum through a teaching lens, but also through the lens of librarian with information literacy ideas at the forefront of their mind.

While there can certainly be challenges and hurdles in setting up the time for a TL to collaboratively work with teachers in planning development, this can be overcome with wisdom and relationship. Curriculum development does not have to be done with face to face interactions, so it could be that a share document be set up for all staff to have their say in what is being offered. I know that I personally find the convenience of using certain sharing online platforms invaluable, but this is not the case of all teachers. While not currently in a TL role, sharing documents in a consistent way is something which I am doing and hopefully encouraging others to do so as well. In a school environment where there is always constant change, I have found that it is always the relational efforts which create more change.

A Principal’s opinion on collaborative planning is one of the key factors which will influence a school’s view on using many people within a planning cycle. My opinion is that a Principal should encourage planning opportunities with TLs and classroom teachers, but until the culture of school is ready to take this planning as expected, encouragement is the way to go.

References:

Young, R. (2004). Clan Agnew (Scottish Clan). FOTW Flags of the World. https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/gb_sccag.html

Opportunity Knocks

While searching for an article about Inquiry Learning I came across this gem by Lee FitzGerald (2015). FitzGerald looks at the process of Guided Inquiry (GI) through the lens of a Teacher-Librarian and, as such, brings a depth to the information beyond classroom teaching. The links to the Australian Curriculum shown within this article show that the process of GI is of utmost importance. The detail around the design and implementation of the process of Inquiry learning is clear and while it looks in depth at just one of many inquiry models, it has added clarity to my understanding of the process.

References:

FitzGerald, L. (2015). Opportunity knocks: The Australian curriculum and guided inquiry. Access, 29(2), 4-17.