The fact that there are so many ways to describe the teacher librarian (TL), aka media specialist, the school librarian, and the school library media specialist, gives some indication of how diverse the role has become.
The Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) and the Australian School Library Association (ASLA) Standards of professional excellence for teacher librarians describe areas of professional knowledge and practice teacher librarians should possess in order to, amongst other criteria, “reinforce a uniform expectation of the work of the teacher librarian in our schools“. Nevertheless, not so long ago, in 2010, then Minister for Education, Julia Gillard MP, initiated an inquiry into school libraries and teacher librarians in Australian schools. The outcome was a distinct lack of data regarding numbers, qualifications and employment status (House of Representatives Education and Employment Committee, 2011, pg. 84) and 2019 survey of all 728 Government, Catholic and independent schools in South Australia revealed that only 23% have a qualified TL. Despite growing numbers of TLs in schools, many schools do not understand the potential role of the library and the teacher librarian, and are focusing funding on the a transactional, rather than a relational library service.
I think tensions arise from situations in which the role and the expectations towards the TL have not been adequately defined. If a school is employing a qualified TL, it is to be hoped that they are being paid accordingly and have had the HR discussions regarding the parameters of their role. My experience of school libraries to date is more the sole responsibility mode where there is considerable stress involved in performing the day-to-day requirements of the school library with part-time library staff and the support of volunteers. This leaves little opportunity to develop a working relationship with teaching staff and to support literacy and effective information literacy skills.
Tensions arise not only when expectations are too high (given staffing levels, budget, lack of professional training etc.) but also when expectations are not high enough and the skills of the TL go unrecognised or are undervalued. In professional situations where there is resistance to change, a lack of dialogue between school leadership and teachers, the level of frustration for the TL can be high.
In all of these scenarios, communication is the key factor. A TL who is not in a position to elucidate their vision, communicate their goals and establish a forum of ongoing communication with the entire school staff will battle to implement change. Being an advocate is not enough, it is important to have a clear idea of what the school’s learning needs and how to meet them and this requires considerable analysis (Abbott, 2017).
I personally feel apprehensive about my ability balance the demands of the information specialist with the teaching role of the TL simply because I have never had to wear these two hats. I feel some trepidation about the sheer number of roles the TL is expected to take on and the limited resources they often have to perform them well. Elizabeth Hutchinson’s blog post resonated with me because I can really imagine running around trying to engage teachers in information literacy programs while they are focusing on the next set of assessments and meeting with a lukewarm response or perhaps worse, being inundated with requests for help when they discover what we have to offer.
My dream is to have a working environment similar to that found in academic libraries, where the library liaison or embedded librarian, is able to build relationships and work in collaboration with staff to customise the library instruction to meet the needs of students, and help them achieve their learning objectives. Right now, this relationship building is under-rated and largely invisible to school leadership and staff alike, calling for what has been called an engagement model of liaison librarianship.
References:
Abbott, R. (2017). Teacher-librarians, teachers and the 21st century library: relationships matter. Synergy, 15(2). Retrieved from https://search-informit-com-au.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/fullText;dn=217216;res=AEIPT
Bracke, P. (2016). Social networks and relational capital in library service assessment. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 17(2), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-04-2016-0019
Dix, K., Felgate, R., Ahmed, S., Carslake, T., & Sniedze-Gregory, S. (2020). School libraries in South Australia 2019 Census. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-583-6
House Standing Committee on Education and Employment. (2011). School libraries and teacher librarians in 21st century Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=ee/schoollibraries/report.htm
Mitchell, P. & Weldon, P. (2016, 29 August-2 September). The school library workforce in Australia.[Conference paper]. ALIA National 2016 Conference. Adelaide, SA. https://read.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/the_school_library_workforce_in_australia.pdf
Paraschiv, P. [Petra Paraschiv] (2018, February 28). Modern libraries: Moving from a transactional to a relational library. Princh. https://princh.com/modern-libraries-from-a-transactional-to-a-relational-library/#.WpvA8OhuZPY
Zanin-Yost, A. (2018). Academic collaborations: Linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25:2,150-163. DOI: /10691316.2018.1455548

