Month: April 2021

Information Literacy in the school context

Mandy Lupton’s article Inquiry skills in the Australian Curriculum presents an interesting analysis of the links (and omissions) in the inquiry methods in the Australian Curriculum across the disciplines of Science, History and Geography.

These three disciplines give scope for inquiry learning, whether it’s guided inquiry with questions posed by the teacher, or open inquiry with questions posed by the student. Both of these inquiry models require the students to answer the questions using inquiry methods.

Inquiry models can be used across a variety of disciplines. It is important to have a consistent approach to inquiry so that the same techniques and methods are used consistently. Kath Murdoch’s Inquiry Cycle (Murdoch, 2019) is the inquiry method I am most familiar with as this is the model that is used in my K-12 school.

This uniform approach to information literacy is intertwined with collaboration between the TL, teachers and the principal. The vision of all three need to match so that the skills being taught and used by the students are systematic and consistent.

Lupton states that there are omissions in the Australian Curriculum when it comes to information literacy and the imbedded skills. This omission is seen as both an oversight, but at the same time an opportunity for the TL to shine in their role as curriculum innovators.

“If teacher librarians see their role as curriculum innovators, then integrating the Australian Curriculum strands into a coherent inquiry learning framework that explicitly integrates information literacy may be one of the most significant ways we can contribute to the implementation of the Australian Curriculum” (Lupton, 2014, p. 18).

This cannot be done by the TL alone. It needs to be a whole-school approach in order to achieve the best outcomes for students in their emerging and continuing skills in information literacy.

 

 

References

Lupton, M.(2014) Inquiry skills in the Australian Curriculum v6, Access, November

Murdoch, K. (2019). A model for designing a journey of inquiry. Retrieved from Kath Murdoch: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55c7efeae4b0f5d2463be2d1/t/5d672b554646780001dbe0fd/1567042417794/%23A+MODEL+FOR+DESIGNING+A+JOURNEY+OF+INQUIRY.pdf

Inquiry learning vs. standardised testing

How do 21st century skills and skills accountability work together? This is such a big question and one I am not going to solve by myself in a single blog post. There are expectations on both sides of the debate. On one hand we want our students to be independent thinkers, capable of posing questions about a variety of topics and interests, and using inquiry methods to answer these questions. On the other hand, there are growth point expectations with NAPLAN, HSC and LIEN testing, just to name a few.

There would be several issues that could potentially arise in a school that adopts an inquiry learning approach. These would include

  • students lacking skills in being able to complete standardised tests such as NAPLAN
  • reluctance for some students to participate
  • Teacher not having the appropriate professional development to support students in inquiry learning

Every school I have taught in states that they do not ‘teach to the test’ for NAPLAN, however, inevitably a few weeks before NAPLAN commences, out come the past papers as a way for students to familiarise themselves with the types of questions they will be faced with. This is a dilemma every Year 3, 5, 7, and 9 teacher tackles every year. To prepare or not to prepare? From my own experience I have seen students (and parents) get very stressed and anxious about NAPLAN, but is the solution to get rid of it and lose the growth point data? Is there a better way to track learning growth and development without NAPLAN?

Some students may be reluctant to participate in inquiry learning because they are disengaged from their learning, perhaps through a learning disability, or they find the process overwhelming. This is a challenge for inquiry learning that would need to be addressed as the individual situations arise.

Inquiry learning success is also dependent on teachers being able to facilitate the inquiry learning process. Teacher who do not have the appropriate professional development in inquiry learning may not be able to support their students successfully.

These are but a handful of issues that could arise in a school which adopts an inquiry learning approach, though I feel I have raised more questions than answers.

Teacher librarians have a unique role in the school for the implementation of inquiry learning, however there are challenges that arise. Collaboration with class teachers and students is key to the success of inquiry learning but a challenge that arises is everyone’s best friend – time. Time to prepare the inquiry learning project in collaboration with the TL and class teacher, as well as time for all parties (TL, class teacher and student) to work together on the inquiry project.

I don’t feel the skills acquired in inquiry learning and the skills required for standardised testing are mutually exclusive, in that the skills learnt in one can be useful in the other. However standardised testing has given questions to answer, rather than questions to be devised by students.

Step 1 of 2
Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.
Skip to toolbar