Charles Sturt University (CSU) presents an intricate organisational structure that requires careful analysis to determine its classification within organisational theory. The three primary organisational structures are hierarchy, team-based, and matrix. Each has distinct characteristics and implications for management and communication within an institution.

CSU’s Structure Analysis:

Hierarchical Elements – CSU’s structure displays a strong hierarchical component. The presence of multiple deputy vice-chancellors, chief officers, and various divisions and schools indicates a clear chain of command and defined lines of authority, which are characteristic of a traditional hierarchical structure.

Team-Based Elements – While hierarchy is evident, CSU also shows elements of a team-based structure. Divisions such as the Division of Learning and Teaching and the Division of People and Culture suggest a collaborative approach to specific operational areas, fostering teamwork within these units.

Matrix Elements – A matrix structure is typically defined by dual reporting relationships and a blend of functional and project-based management. CSU’s structure includes several research institutes and centres, such as the AI and Cyber Futures Institute and the Rural Health Research Institute, which might operate with cross-functional teams. However, the structure primarily leans towards functional management, with clear vertical divisions rather than a true matrix’s dual lines of authority.

CSU’s organisational structure predominantly aligns with a hierarchical model, incorporating team-based elements to promote collaboration within specific divisions. Although there are aspects that suggest a matrix approach, such as research institutes and specialised centres, the structure lacks the dual reporting relationships characteristic of a true matrix. Therefore, it should be considered more of a hybrid structure with strong hierarchical foundations rather than a pure matrix model.