Professional Portfolio

Photo by Mark Williams on Unsplash

Part A  – Personal philosophy 

An effective teacher librarian (TL) can help to establish the library as the learning hub of the school. They are approachable, friendly, and make it their mission to help students and staff with their learning needs. Effective TLs can suggest required resources to suit student and staff needs and provide for equitable access to resources and technology. They increase student learning by incorporating 21st Century skills such as critical thinking into their lessons. Effective TLs provide guidance in areas most teachers lack – information literacy and integrating aspects of the Australian Curriculum and technology into learning. They are proactive, collaborative, instructional partners, and leaders.

 

Part B – The top three themes

As I am not currently working in a library, the experiences listed here are based on a temporary librarian position I held in a primary school for a year prior to commencing this course. The future recommendations are how I would implement the knowledge when I am working in a school library. The Teacher Librarian (TL) has a diverse role that is often underrated by teachers and sometimes executive. The three main themes that stand out for me as a TL are the roles of the TL, collaboration and networking, and advocating the TL and library services.

 

Theme 1. The roles of the TL

As outlined in the blog post ‘The perceived role of the TL’ (Silver, 2019a) many teachers view the TL’s role as borrowing out books, providing resources, release from face to face (RFF), and encouraging reading. The role of the TL now includes more than just providing resources and fostering a love of reading (Lupton, 2016, p.57). The TL is also an instructional partner in literacies, technology, and curriculum integration.

Information literacy

As information abounds in an increasingly digital world students need to be taught information literacy (Burkhardt, 2017, p.29). Ensuring students are information literate is one of the main roles of the TL  (Herring, 2007, p.33).  I entered this Masters with a narrow view of literacy, as outlined in the blog ‘What is information literacy?’ (Silver, 2019b).  In the past, I often taught information literacy skills as stand-alone lessons. I have since learnt one of the best ways to introduce information literacy to students is by incorporating inquiry learning through literacy models. Inquiry learning is an effective tool to create authentic learning experiences as it assists students to become independent learners who apply critical thinking skills (Stripling, 2020, p.16). The use of such models also allows students to be aware of their affective and cognitive states when engaging in information literacy. Firsthand knowledge of these states is detailed in the blog post ‘The research rollercoaster’ (Silver, 2019c).

Digital literacy/ Technology use

Technology is becoming increasingly important for gaining information and communicating (Gulatee & Combes, 2018, p.82). However, many students lack digital literacy skills. Research shows students rely on the internet when searching for information but have poor search and evaluation skills and satisfice with information found rather than find accurate information (Coombes, 2007). Students pay little attention to information sources on the web, which may be biased (Kammerer, Brand-Gruwel, Jarodzka, 2018, p.83). A report on this is outlined in the blog ‘Students and digital literacy – are they really literate? (Silver, 2020a).

The TL can show how to implement technology, ensure students know how to access data and research effectively (Mann, 2011, p.29). Being able to critically evaluate a website and its information is increasingly important. One such way to do this is with the CRAAP test – currency, relevancy, author, accuracy, and purpose (Berg, 2017, p.9). Critically evaluating web sources for validity and relevance is one area I would strongly work on with students.

TLs also teach ethical use of information (Mann, 2011, p.30). By making students aware of copyright and plagiarism, the TL fulfills the Australian Curriculum’s outcomes on ethical protocols in using ICT general capabilities. Introducing students to creative commons is one way of providing them with knowledge to create and share their work ethically.  Creative commons are detailed in the blog post ‘Creative Commons – lets share that creativity!’ (Silver, 2020b).

Whilst I had knowledge of plagiarism and a slight understanding of image/music copyright my knowledge of copyright has grown considerably. Through INF533 Resourcing the Curriculum I’ve become aware of copyright’s impact on schooling, as outlined in the blog ‘Copyright – don’t be in the wrong’ (Silver, 2020c). Sorry teachers, no more popping on a Netflix movie during wet weather!

During the course, I have used many digital tools including Pinterest, G Suite for Education, Powtoon, Screencastify, Adobe Connect, Zoom, and Padlet. During virtual placement, I transferred these skills and used Microsoft Teams and Stream to create ‘how-to’ videos on accessing and using the Ebscohost database. In the future, I could use this knowledge to create mini-lessons for patrons on how to access the library catalogue and research effectively. During COVID lockdowns I taught a teacher how to use ICT more effectively in online teaching by using Screencastify. He then created an online demonstration for students on how to submit work in Google Classroom. In the same way, it is beneficial to teach students how to use tools that can be applied to other situations, even though the tools may be different in the future.

 

Integrating the Australian Curriculum

Previously I tended to base library lessons on Science or English outcomes and had little knowledge of the Australian Curriculum General Capabilities and Cross Curricular Priorities. I now know TLs can provide guidance on how to integrate these areas into lessons and programs. For the General Capabilities, particularly relevant are the Literacy, Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) capabilities.

The TL can also integrate Cross-curriculum priorities – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures, Asia and Australia’s Engagement with Asia and Sustainability into the library program This is demonstrated in the following program I created for stage 2 Science on the seasons which integrates CCT, Aboriginal culture, and information literacy.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Throughout the course, I have also been able to provide suggestions for resources for teachers in the form of an annotated bibliography about sustainability.

 Theme 2. The importance of collaboration and networking

Traditionally the TL has taught in isolation in the library. I often felt isolated in the library from other staff and school activities and learning. Frequently primary school TLs are used for RFF with limited time to teach skills. For students to integrate their learning from the TL, lessons need to be taught in situ with class lessons, not just viewed as a ‘library lesson’ that only applies in library.  Teaching content and skills together creates more meaningful learning for students and is remembered for longer (Kowalsky, 2014, p.112).

Using a flexible timetable rather than an RFF timetable allows for more flexibility in collaborating time with teachers or time to teach in the classroom (Kaldenberg, 2011, p.44). It allows for greater information literacy and technology integration by the TL. When using a flexible teaching model there are obstacles to overcome, such as replacing planning time lost from using library lessons as RFF and teacher attitudes and experiences (Sturge, 2019, p.28). Not all teachers are aware of the skills and knowledge the TL possesses or have ever collaborated with the TL (Montiel-Overall, 2010, p.48). Many teachers do not realise that the TL is aware of new technology and how to assist teachers to integrate it into lessons for effective learning (Baker & Willis, 2016, p.58). Teachers may not know that the TL can integrate information literacy and inquiry learning as well. An ideal way to highlight and promote these skills is through collaboration with teachers.

TL’s need to work with classroom teachers (in the library or the classroom) on the lessons being taught.  The teacher has knowledge of the students’ abilities and the curriculum and the TL has knowledge of resources, information literacy, and technology. The TL and teacher can collaborate on what students need to know, plan out when to teach skills and knowledge, and provide ongoing assessment and feedback (Cooper & Bray, 2011, p.50). When teaching together the synergy of each person’s skills can increase student knowledge and application. The teacher is also able to reinforce the ideas taught throughout their other lessons. Despite the skills and knowledge of the TL collaboration is not always easily implemented as detailed in the blog post ‘Collaboration’ (Silver, 2019d). Understanding how to collaborate also helps, as outlined below (Bastow Institute, 2015).

Bastow Institute (2015, July 26). Collaboration – What do you bring to the table? – Tracey Ezard

However, if successful, collaboration can be achieved the benefits are enormous for students. These range from increased ethical understanding (Mohamed, 2017, p.137) to knowledge of content, increased communication skills, and use of information literacy skills (Copeland & Jacobs, 2017, p.25). A flexible timetable that allows time for collaboration is my ideal library model. However, I have learnt that if a flexible timetable is not currently feasible there are strategies that can be used to lay the foundations for it. One such way is to choose a few teachers who are willing to work collaboratively. Start small on a task, plan together, and help teach the unit and then advertise your successes (Cooper & Bray, 2011, p.49). In this way, more teachers (and administration) will see the benefits and want to work collaboratively with the TL.

Although the TL can often work in isolation in the school, the TL can feel supported and grow through networking. Before beginning this Masters I attended some TL networking meetings, conferences, and followed (lurked in) Yammer. In INF532 Knowledge Networking for Educators, I learnt more about how technology can be incorporated into networking for teacher and student learning. I grew in confidence and came a long way in overcoming my reluctance in using social media for networking. One way educators can stay informed and grow their practice is through the use of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter. Twitter allows educators to connect and communicate with people around the globe as demonstrated in my digital artifact on ‘Using Twitter for beginners to establish a personal learning network’ (Silver, 2019e).

Silver, T. (2019e, May 6). Using Twitter for beginners to establish a personal learning network. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYDWAATW0VQ&rel=0

The use of Twitter helped me to widen my network and opened up a world of new people, ideas, and resources as outlined in the blog post ‘Using Twitter – an update’ (Silver, 2019f).

Using technology makes it easy for TLs and teachers to connect and collaborate with people in different locations (Nussbaum-Beach & Ritter, 2011, p.21). This can be advantageous in organising students to work together across the world. Students can also work with community knowledge via Twitter or connect with subject experts via Skype. In my studies, I learnt that just like classroom activities the social media experience should be planned out so students get the most benefit from the experience. Benefits of connected learning include critical thinking (questions to ask and how to pose them), learning social protocol, reflecting on writing skills, and increased vocabulary (Tolisano, 2011).  Through the use of technology students and teachers can experience the benefits of becoming connected educators by connecting, collaborating, creating, and sharing with others. This is one area I am very excited to explore in the future.

 

Theme 3. Advocacy – Showcasing the TL

However, all of the great knowledge and skills of the TL are wasted unless staff know about the advantages of a TL. Qualified TLs are essential in improving student learning in a school. Schools with a qualified TL perform better in NAPLAN results than schools without (Dix, Felgate, Ahmed, Carslake, & Sniedze-Gregory, 2020, p.10). However, the role of the TL that is most often visible/thought of by staff is the administration role.

Even administrators may not value the TL as evidenced by a recent study (Lupton, 2016, p.53). The TL and library need to be viewed as learning areas first and resource providers second (Herring, 2007, p.27). This may be achieved by having a strategic plan, assisting the principal, and being an active member of the school community.

Advocacy is an area I did not do well at in the past, as outlined in the blog post ‘The principal and the teacher librarian – a reflection on practice’ (Silver, 2019g). I lacked the use of strategy and data in trying to achieve my goal. Having a mission statement and strategic plan based on the statement is important for guiding the direction of the library and how it links to the school’s mission (Wong, 2012, p.22). The library I worked in did not have a library mission statement or strategic plan and I didn’t value their importance. Had I aligned the library’s mission to the school’s my efforts as the TL may have been more valued.  Aligning the budget with the strategic plan also highlights how resources support student achievement (Wong, 2012, p.24). I spent most of my budget on purchasing an online encyclopedia, updating reference material for stage three research, and buying popular fiction books to encourage reading (particularly amongst the boys). Had I created a mission statement and strategic plan I could have linked in how spending this money was increasing the literacy of students at the school.

Aligning the library program with the principal’s priorities will result in the school library having more value to the principal (Kachel, 2017, p.50). This can be achieved by identifying problems the principal is facing and how the TL and library program can help to overcome these problems (Ray, 2013, p.23). I’ve learnt to think about what the TL can do for the principal, not what they can do for the library.  I believe if I had thought this way previously, the outcome with the principal may have been different.

The TL can integrate the school library into the school by being involved with people and committees within the school and offering leadership capabilities. Three areas the TL should be involved in are working with the school leadership team, stage levels, and the whole school (Roberts, 2015, p.32). It is important the TL be present when the school leadership team reviews data and when decisions are made to highlight resources and/or technology that may be required and incorporate strategic directions into library lessons. Working with stage levels allows the TL to coordinate and implement school directions across the stages and connect with individuals. Communicating with parents about what the library is doing is also important (Miller & Ray, 2018, p.25). I did carry out some of these involvements, communicating with parents through the weekly newsletter, participating in whole school activities such as Breakfast Club, and being an active member of the Positive Behaviour for Learning (PBL) team. However, other areas I didn’t do well at, such as pushing to be included in school leadership teams and whole school literacy planning (ironically I provided RFF for these days). In the future, I will ask to be included, to make a seat for myself at the table (Miller & Ray, 2018, p.24)

Advocacy can also be improved by focusing on increasing student learning, working collaboratively with teachers to achieve this, and showcasing the successes (Stripling, 2020, p.16). Through my studies, I now have ideas to approach teachers with as to how the TL can improve student learning. I would also keep evidence of data and link this to how the work of the TL has deepened student learning (Keeling, 2020, p.5). Using this data and showcasing the success of student learning would inspire collaboration and increase the value of the TL.

In focusing on highlighting the work of the library some administration work may need to be delegated, such as returning and shelving books to allow for spending time on activities that influence student learning more (Purcell, 2010, p.31). This is one area I believe I struggled with. Recruiting student helpers would have alleviated the administration tasks and left more time for planning lessons that took advantage of the TL skills and made the TL a more valued staff member. By spending more time on value-adding activities and publicising how the TL and library programs support the school’s goals and improve student learning the library can become the learning heart of the school.

 

Part C – Development of skills and attitudes as per ASLA/ALIA standards

I have learnt a great deal throughout the course and I see the following actions as ways to continue to develop my skills and practice as per ASLA standards for proficient teachers.

2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area and 3.1 Establish challenging learning goals I want to work collaboratively with teachers to establish challenging learning goals for students that incorporate information literacy. I am keen to establish learning goals for different students based on their needs.

2.6 Information Communication Technology (ICT) – Although I have gained some good ideas of technological tools and how to use these, I would like to apply these ideas in practice. I want to integrate technology more into lessons by collaborating with teachers to make learning more meaningful and authentic. I would love to incorporate Skype experts and Skyping (or Zooming) with other classes for students to work together.

4.3 Manage challenging behaviour – This is my weakest area in teaching. In my role as the TL, I really struggled with maintaining a disciplined classroom. I did try implementing several behaviour management strategies but they weren’t very successful. This is definitely an area I need to work on, perhaps proactively seeking and talking to teachers about their students at the start of the year would be beneficial. Also working in collaboration with teaching staff on lessons would instill a sense of the TL also being a real ‘teacher’.

6.3 Engage with colleagues and improve practice I will grow by continuing to attend TL conferences from ASLA, Mantle, and local networking opportunities, such as the Central Coast Teacher Librarian Network. The events are always inspiring and informative. It is very worthwhile seeing how other librarians work, issues, and ideas they have.

Using social media is one area that I would like to improve in as it offers great benefits. Before starting the course, I was not a big social media user. However, as I have lurked and increasingly posted on sites I continually see the benefits. Due to my lack of experience with the library, I don’t feel confident in contributing to these networks yet.

 6.4 Apply professional learning and improve student learning I see myself becoming more involved in this area as I have more experiences to offer. Blogging is a great tool for reflecting on materials learnt and integrating these into experiences. When I first began blogging, I found it difficult to put my ideas ‘out there’, open to comment, and possible criticism. In reality, comments made on blog posts have led me to think more deeply and gain further insight or other viewpoints on an issue.

Overall, I feel more confident in fulfilling the role of TL than I had in the past. I now know how the library can support the school’s mission and the many skills the TL can bring to support learning and how to promote these skills. As I gain more experience, I will be more confident to move onto working on the ASLA standards for highly accomplished teachers. Throughout the course, I have learnt so much new knowledge and many skills which I am eager to put into practice.

References:

Berg, C. (2017). Teaching website evaluation. Internet@Schools, 24(2), p.8-10.

Bastow Institute (2015, July 26). Collaboration – What do you bring to the table? – Tracey Ezard

. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4ifwS3ZIno&feature=emb_rel_pause

Burkhardt (2017). Combating fake news in the digital age. Library Technology Reports, 53(8), p.1-33. Available at alatechsource.org

Cooper, O. P., & Bray, M. (2011). School library media specialist-teacher collaboration: Characteristics, challenges, opportunities. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 55(4), 48–55.

Copeland, A., & Jacobs, L. (2017). The power of collaboration between school librarian and classroom teacher. Teacher Librarian, 45(2), 22–27.

Dix, K., Felgate, R., Ahmed, S.K., Carslake, T., & Sniedze-Gregory, S. (2020). School libraries in South Australia: 2019 Census. Australian Council for Educational Research. Adelaide, Australia https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-583-6

Gulatee, Y. & Combes, B. (2018). Owning ICT: Student Use and Ownership of Technology. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 15(1), p.81-94.

Herring, J. (2007). Teacher librarians and the school library. In S. Ferguson (Ed.) Libraries in the twenty-first century : charting new directions in information (pp. 27-42). Wagga Wagga , NSW : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.

Kachel, D. (2017). The principal and the librarian: Positioning the school library program. Teacher Librarian, 45(1), 50–52.

Kaldenberg, K. (2011). Go, set, ready: Collaborative relationships for 21st Century learning. Teacher Librarian, 38(4), 44-47.

Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S. & Jarodzka, H. (2018). The Future of Learning by Searching the Web: Mobile, Social, and Multimodal. Frontline Learning Research, 6(2), p.81-91.

Keeling, M. (2020). Adopting effective advocacy strategies. Knowledge Quest, 48(4), 4–5.

Kowalski, K. (2014). Collaborative learning design in librarian and teacher partnerships. In K. Kennedy & L. Green (Ed.) Collaborative models for librarian and teacher partnerships (pp.111-120). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4361-1.ch010

Lupton, M. (2016). Adding value: Principals’ Perceptions of the Role of the Teacher-Librarian. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(1), 49-61.

Mann, S. (2011). 21st-Century school librarians: Envisioning the future. School Library Journal, 28(2), p.29-30.

Miller, S. M., & Ray, M. (2018). Two Future Ready librarians explore advocacy in and outside of the library. Knowledge Quest, 46(3), 22–27.

Mohamad, G. (2017). A librarian-teacher collaboration: Integrating information literacy and technology in the K-12 classroom (Order No. 10745746). Available from ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2019646774). Retrieved from https://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/docview/2019646774?accountid=10344

 Montiel-Overall, P. (2010). Further understanding of collaboration: A case study of how it works with teachers and librarians. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(2). 31-54.

Nussbaum-Beach, S., & Ritter, H. L. (2011). Connected educator, the: Learning and leading in a digital age. Bloomington, Ind. : Solution Tree Press

Purcell, M. (2010). All librarians do is check out books, right? A look at the roles of a school media specialist. Library Media Connection, 29(3), 30-33.

Ray, M. (2013). The Same Difference. School Library Journal, 59(2), 20–23.

Roberts, K. R. (2015). Collaboration: The Essential Role of Library Leaders. Library Media Connection, 33(6), 32–33.

Silver, T. (2019a, March 14).  The perceived role of the TL  [blog post].  https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/03/14/the-percieved-role-of-the-teacher-librarian/

Silver, T. (2019b, May 24).  What is information literacy? [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/05/24/what-is-information-literacy/

Silver, T. (2019c, April 22).  The research rollercoaster [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/04/22/the-research-rollercoaster/

Silver, T. (2019d, September 9).  Collaboration [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/09/21/collaboration/

Silver, T. (2019e, May 6). Using Twitter for beginners to establish a personal learning network

. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYDWAATW0VQ&rel=0

Silver, T. (2019f, May 25).  Using Twitter – an update  [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/05/25/using-twitter-an-update/

Silver, T. (2019g, May 25).  The principal and the teacher librarian – a reflection on practice  [blog post].  https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2019/04/22/the-principal-and-the-teacher-librarian-tl-a-reflection-on-practice/.

Silver, T. (2020a, April 22). Students and digital literacy – are they really literate? [blog post].  https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2020/09/13/students-and-dig…-really-literate/

Silver, T. (2020b, May 15). Creative Commons – Let’s share that creativity! [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2020/05/15/creative-commons…-that-creativity/

Silver, T. (2020c, May 15). Copyright – don’t be in the wrong  [blog post]. https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/learningawaits/2020/05/09/copyright-dont-be-in-the-wrong/

Stripling, B. K. (2020). Advocating for the “why” of school libraries: Empowering students through inquiry. Knowledge Quest, 48(4), 14–20.

Sturge, J. (2019). Assessing readiness for school library collaboration. Knowledge Quest, 47(3), 25-31.

Tolisano, S. (2011, February 6). Framing a Skype Learning Experience [blog post]. Langwitches: The magic of learning. http://langwitches.org/blog/2011/02/06/framing-a-skype-learning-experience/

Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). The power of networked learning. In Personal learning networks: Using the power of connections to transform education (pp. 1-14). Moorabbin, Victoria  Solution Tree Press.

Wong, T. (2012). Strategic long-range planning. Library Media Connection, 31(2), 22-24.

Students and digital literacy – are they really literate?

Photo by freestocks on Unsplash

Digital literacy can incorporate many aspects. In this blog post it refers to having an understanding of critically evaluating information. There has been immense growth in internet usage, however, it is more difficult to make meaning from digital information (Combes, 2016).

However,  despite using the internet frequently adolescents  do not possess high skill levels in reading online, in particular locating and critically evaluating information (Leu, McVerry, O’Byrne, Kiili, Zawilinski, Everett-Cacopardo, Kennedy, Forzani, 2011, p.8). This is a worrying trend when most young people trust media from friends, social sites or online which may not be correct, taken out of context or digitally manipulated (Combes, 2016).

The latest report by the Stanford History Education Group (2019, p.3) highlights some worrying results.  Just over half of the students believed  a bad quality video represented political fraud which was untrue. Only 0.1 % of students sought facts to check the videos credibility. 66% could not distinguish between political adverts and news stories and 96% did not question the credibility of a website based on the author’s bias.

Given the ever-evolving capabilities of technology to develop and distribute fake news, these results are indeed troublesome. Digital literacy is something that the teacher librarian and classroom teachers can work together on to improve results in the future.

References:

Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2019). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait. Stanford History Education Group & Gibson Consulting. https://purl.stanford.edu/gf151tb4868

Combes, B.  (2016). Digital Literacy : A new flavour of literacy or something different?  Synergy, 14 (1).

Leu, D., McVerry, J.,  O’Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett-Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C., Forzani, E. (2011). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: expanding the literacy and learning curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 5-14. www.doi.org:10.1598/JAAL.55.1.1

Experiencing Digital Literature Assessment 2, Part B – Critical Reflection of digital literature experiences

Photo by Blaz Photo on Unsplash

Digital texts have progressed from books on CD Rom in the 1980s (Bartram, 2014, paragraph 5) to ebooks, interactive books and transmedia platforms (Lamb, 2011, p.17). Good digital texts have the ability to link digital features with literacy (Walsh, 2013, p.186).  However, many do not take full advantage of digital features for education purposes (McGeehan, Chambers & Nowakowski, 2018, p.62) such as changing font size, highlighting and annotating. The use of narration and games help to scaffold learning, as do web links and dictionary meanings (Cavanaugh, 2014, p.8). Ebooks may lack numerous features due to the inconsistencies in formatting requirements and file size with suppliers (Kudler, 2020).

Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone from Kindle in Motion is an exemplary enhanced ebook, offering animated illustrations, dictionary, annotation and translations. The reading experience is further extended by an active link to Pottermore – the digital world of Harry Potter. An excellent example of a transmedia text is Inanimate Alice which traces the story through multiple digital platforms and formats.

My own reading experiences are different between print and digital texts. When I have to read in-depth, such as university readings, I prefer print as it is easier to comprehend the information read. This is not unusual, a study by Mangen, Walgerno, & Bronnick (2013, p.67) revealed when reading text of more than a page in length participants comprehended more reading from paper than on a screen. Although, this appears to be linked to text type, such as expository texts rather than narratives and the amount of reading time available (Halamish & Elbaz,2020). Like many others (Jabr, 2013) I like to physically highlight and notate on the page. I am also able to see an overview of the text and find it easier to orientate myself or remember the location where something is written. It is easier to locate where specific text is on a physical page, plus print books offer the ability to easily flip back to locations to recheck information (Mangen, Olivier, & Velay, 2019, p.8).

When reading for leisure I also enjoy reading a print book. I like the aesthetics of holding the book and turning the pages. I also find it less fatiguing on my eyes, which research reveals may result from the rolling of the computer screen (Combes, 2016), screen illumination, character size or spacing between lines (Lee, Ko, Shen & Chao, 2011, p.6) .

When I read digital texts I read differently, expecting a more instant result. I tend to skim and scan the text more, looking for key words to find the information quickly. This is typical of most people reading online (Cull, 2011, p.7). This may be due to the fact that when reading online most people are looking to answer a question (Leu, Forzani, Timbrell & Maykell, 2015, p.40).

However, digital texts are instantly available worldwide to anybody with an internet connection and device. This makes them available to different ages and interest groups. They also offer the convenience of carrying books easily and without the weight.

Digital texts also may have benefits over print in the classroom. E-books provide a motivation for students to read for pleasure (Cavanaugh, 2014, p.5, Lamb, 2011, p.17). They can be used to provide differentiation for student learning (Lamb, 2011, p.16) and students may feel more comfortable using ebooks due to privacy of reading content, level and progression rate (Knapp, 2019, p.56). The technology used can assist struggling readers, utlilising text to speech, definitions and translations (Knapp, 2019, p.58). In one study reading remediation students who incorporating ebooks exited the program two months earlier than their peers (Guernsey, 2011,p.32). Digital texts can also be used to improve students comprehension, critical thinking and discussion skills increased via digital literature circles (District Administration, 2017).

Outside the classroom digital texts may connect readers through social media, where students can post and read book reviews (Knapp, 2019, p.59). Social media can also be used to connect readers and access authors, from Twitter to websites such as Pottermore (Valenza & Stephens, 2012, p.77) which have games, fan stories etc.

Of the ebooks reviewed, I most enjoyed Water Can Be by Laura Purdie Salas. After viewing and discussing the book it could be incorporated into a stage 3 program as a prompt for Science, Art or English.

For Science students investigate the different states of water, outcome ACSSU077 (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], n.d.a) by linking to images in the book. Brainstorm, research and add other situations where water is shown in the three states.

For the literacy strand in English – Creating texts, outcomes ACELY1704 and ACELY1707 (ACARA, n.d.b), students follow the books format to create their own digital book on what a subject can be…… For example ‘a stick could be…..’ .

For Art students explore ideas and practices (outcome ACAVAM114) and communicate meaning (outcome ACAVAR117) (ACARA, n.d.c)  by creating their own artworks about water, drawing on other cultures, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks on water.

 

References:

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.a). The Australian Curriculum: Science. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/science  

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.b). The Australian Curriculum: English. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/english

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.c). The Australian Curriculum: The Arts – Visual Art. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/the-arts/visual-arts/

Bartram, M. (2014). The History of eBooks from 1930’s “Readies” to Today’s GPO eBook Services. Government Book Talk. https://govbooktalk.gpo.gov/2014/03/10/the-history-of-ebooks-from-1930s-readies-to-todays-gpo-ebook-services/#:~:text=Starting%20back%20in%201971%2C%20Michael,first%20eBook%20in%20the%20world.&text=2007%20changed%20the%20world%20of,of%20the%20iPhone%20by%20Apple.

Cavanaugh, T. (2014). Ebooks for elementary schoolhttps://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZCaMBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=value+of+ebooks+in+elementary+school&ots=Tz-thkQdlB&sig=-i7619tI7YqREptjE55OsB1_yLo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=value%20of%20ebooks%20in%20elementary%20school&f=false

Combes, B. (2016). Digital literacy: A new flavour of literacy or something different? Synergy, 14(1).

Cull, B. (2011). Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i6.3340

District Administration. (2017). Digital literature circles. TechXcellence.

Guernsey, L. (2011). Are Ebooks Any Good? School Library Journal, 57(6), 28–32.

Halamish, V. & Elbaz, E. (2020). Children’s reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper. Computers & Education, (145). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103737

Jabr, F. (2013, April 11). The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/

Knapp, N. (2019). Using Technology to Foster “Real Reading” in the School Library and Beyond. Knowledge Quest, 48(1), 54–60.

Kudler, D. (May 18, 2020). The problem with enhanced ebooks. The Book Designer. https://www.thebookdesigner.com/2020/05/the-problem-with-enhanced-ebooks/

Lamb, A. (2011). Reading redefined for a transmedia universe. Learning and leading with technology, 39(3), 12-17.

Lee, D.S., Ko, Y.H., Shen, I.H., & Chao, C.Y. (2011). Effect of light source, ambient illumination, character size and interline spacing on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays. Displays, 32(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2010.09.001

Leu, D.J., Forzani, E.,Timbrell, N. & Maykel, C. (2015). Seeing the forest, not the trees – Essential technologies for literacy in the primary-grade and upper elementary-grade classroom. Reading Teacher, 69(2), 139-145.

Mangen, A., Walgermo, R. & Brønnicka, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002

Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J. L. (2019). Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story? Frontiers in psychology10(38). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038

McGeehan, C., Chambers, S., & Nowakowski, J. (2018). Just Because It’s Digital, Doesn’t Mean It’s Good: Evaluating Digital Picture Books. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1399488

Overdrive (n.d). Discover Sora – The student reading app. https://company.overdrive.com/k-12-schools/discover-sora/

Purdie Salas, L. (2014). Water Can Be. Millbrook Press TM.

Valenza, J. K., & Stephens, W. (2012). Reading Remixed. Educational Leadership69(6), 75-78.

Walsh, M. (2013). Literature in a digital environment (Ch. 13). In L. McDonald (Ed.), A literature companion for teachers. Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).

Yokota, J., & Teale, W. H. (2014). Picture Books and the Digital World. Reading Teacher, 67(8), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1262

 

Assessment 1 – Reflective Blog on digital literacy

Image by Felix Lichtenfeld from Pixabay

My experiences so far of digital literacy are limited (or perhaps I know more than I do and don’t realise it) and somewhat confused.  What exactly is digital literacy? Is web 2.0 technology such as blogs, YouTube and social media etc considered digital literacy?

Based on my experiences so far I believed digital literacy to be:

 

  • Reading traditional text that has been digitised (e-books)
  • Listening to audio books
  • Accessing pdf or html documents from databases for readings
  • Apps or programs to help students ‘read’ and understand a book via animations, voice overs and music.

However, further reading has drawn to my attention that digital literature is much more than that. Even being able to use the internet effectively is considered digital literature. Digital literature has additional skills to traditional literature. These include finding and evaluating information on line, combining information from different sources and communicating information. (Leu, McVerry, O’Byrne, Kiili, Zawilinski, Everett-Cacopardo, Kennedy and Forzani, 2011, p.7). These are valuable skills for all, particularly students to possess. Many student’s online literacy skills are poor despite the student’s opposing beliefs. One area in which students are weak is in analysing search results, particularly clicking on the first search result (Leu, Forzani, Timbrell & Maykel, 2015). I have seen this myself. When questioning year six students about search engine results many responded they choose the first result. On further questioning the majority did not know that many top results are sponsored ads. They certainly did not check for reliability and validity of websites, with many readily agreeing that they did not check the author or credentials of the website.

Walsh (2013, p.181) introduces the idea of digital texts being multi modal, incorporating images, music, and speech to support communication. Whilst I had seen digital stories on websites such as Story Time Online with the stories being read aloud along with some animation, I have not seen other digital narrative features Walsh outlines (p.187). These include:

  • non-linear progression of the story,
  • split screens, ‘mouse over’ effects,
  • interactive games, and
  • ‘mash up’ features.

She encourages educators to evaluate if or how these features accentuate the story and allow students to engage more with the story (2013, p.185). Students also need to be aware of fact and fiction within these features, such as websites with information that appears real but is not, it is part of the story (Lamb, 2011, p.17).

Then there are considerations of reader navigation on the page, some people have difficulty navigating interactive texts (Lamb, 2011, p. 15) or indeed traditional texts in digital format (Jabr, 2013). Whilst I prefer a traditional view of text on a page for ease of navigation, will it be the same for the younger generation? And what about those students with text learning difficulties, do digital literacy features make it easier for them to comprehend ideas better than straight text does?

From the readings thus far in the subject I can see that digital literacy involves more than I believed of reading on a screen. It includes being able to use the internet successfully as well as choosing effective digital narratives. There is a lot for me to learn about the world of digital literacy.

 

References:

Jabr, F. (2013) The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American, April 11. Retrieved from: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/

Lamb, A. (2011). Reading redefined for a transmedia universe. Learning and leading with technology, 39(3), 12-17.

Leu, D.J, Forzani, E.,Timbrell, N. et al (2015) Seeing the forest, not the trees: Essential technologies for literacy in the primary-grade and upper elementrary-grade classroomReading Teacher, 69(2) 139-145

Leu, D.J., McVerry, J.G., O’Byrne, W.I., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett-Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C. and Forzani, E. (2011). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: Expanding the literacy and learning curriculumJournal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1)5-14. Doi: 10.1598/JAAL.55.1.1

Walsh, M. (2013). Literature in a digital environment (Ch. 13). In L. McDonald (Ed.), A literature companion for teachers. Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).  https://doms.csu.edu.au/csu/file/863c5c8d-9f3f-439f-a7e3-2c2c67ddbfa8/1/ALiteratureCompanionforTeachers.pdf

Step 1 of 2
Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.