How does the Tech industry see the University sector?

Mario Barosevcic has written an interesting article Technology enabled teaching & learning in higher education where he points out the gaps he sees in the Education industry, from the perspective of the Tech Industry.

The CSU/Study Group Study Centre Library & Study support teams got together to have a discussion about this.

 

Key points that we pulled out of the article to discuss:

  • When it comes to the education itself, most universities are the same. Professors create curricula and teach through large lecturers. Teaching assistants help distill and clarify lectures and materials. Students attend lectures, use textbooks and complete homework, assignments and exams required to graduate.

  • The student learning experience is often more like a series of disconnected and fragmented experiences. The best students are those that can most effectively navigate all learning roadblocks thrown at them, with limited personalised and tailored academic support.

  • Professors often lack formal training and are far behind school teachers, where there are clear qualifications and prerequisites.

  • Solutions have required too much behavioral change or have offered too little impact

  • Replacing the existing university Learning Management System (LMS) is an almost impossible task given how deeply engrained it is in the system and how long average contracts are. Whilst many have predicted the demise of publishers for years, no one has yet managed to replace them.

  • universities have paraded the streets for decades showing off their untouchable, long established academic offers, while building moats around them through investments in flashy campuses.

  • 28% of students would prefer their assessments and exams to continue to be delivered in person and 71% of students find one or more aspects of their courses should be delivered online.

 

A University “Common Read”, Student Engagement & Libraries

This week CSU Study Centre Study Support & Library Teams discussed the concept of Libraries and Student Engagement generally and Common Read Programs in particular.  something we could implement?

The first paper is quite long. The second paper is a short two pager and gives a bit of an overview of universities using Common Read Programs to collaborate.

View Full Discussion Video Here

A Common Reads Program at CSU Study Centres?

  • Could we use personal development/self help/biographies of business people or ex-international students books?
  • Could students write about their own journies to share with other students?
  • Can we harness ex-Student leaders, who tend to be here “and then they’re gone”?
  • Possible use of videos instead of, or in addition to, other texts. Multi-modal. Shared movie experience-film nights etc.
  • Use SAF funding to buy many copies of texts for students, or to distribute from library.
  • Relies on engagement from students and staff, collaboration across many departments.

Getting Students Involved As Partners in Library Activities

  • Involve DSLs?
  • Create “Library ambassadors”?
  • Approach students and advertise the program
  • Library has done similar through STRIVE program in the past
  • 4 weeks programs – seemed to struggle to maintain student numbers

Other Ideas From Papers Discussed

  • Student Co-Ownership of Learning
  • ‘Amazing Library Race’ at Long Island University
  • Games, gamification and digital badges for information literacy
  • peer-to-peer learning in information literacy teaching
  • Partnerships: IT services, writing centres, or student support services
  • therapy dogs to be brought into the library in order to engage students
  • Big Read in the United Kingdom
  • common reader initiatives in general
  • Student Voice
  • Student employment
  • student library representatives
  • ‘knowledge ambassadors’ or ‘peer mentors
Step 1 of 2
Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.
Skip to toolbar