On the surface, the definition of information should be very simple. How deceptive and naive that thought is!

Simple dictionary definitions do not scrape the surface of all the facets that various types of academic definitions do. The semantic definition where the meaning of information is important as opposed to the more classic definition – almost a dadaist interpretation of information just existing. These seem to be the extremes in the definitions. The data-knowledge continuum tells of chaos and wisdom – which are an extension of the semantic and classic definitions. The classic definition being in incoherent jumble of characters and as the continuum works its way up the sliding scale it becomes more about an information hierarchy about meaning, types of meaning and the types of meaning – a similar concept to Blooms taxonomy. According to Stonier (as cited in O’Connell, n.d.) “information requires no intelligence to interpret it. It does not have to have meaning to exist.”1 However, Gregory Bateson (as cited in O’Connell, n.d.) puts much more emphasis on the meaning of the information as he asserts that it “changes us”2.

It occurs to me that the purpose and the context of the information is important. That is, what the information is being used for, who is using the information, what is  and how it is to be used are all necessary factors. For information to be defined properly, it is necessary to know all these things.

rawpixel / Pixabay

As a prospective Teacher Librarian, it occurred to me that all this information might exist, it may have context and purpose but it is how the information is used and perceived or processed by the conveyor and the receiver is what matters.  It is interesting that Steve Regur in a Ted Talk video (as cited in the “Create, Curate, Collaborate”, n.d.) presents his talk on how “Learning Networks Could Reconfigure Schools”. He talks about collaboration and instead of there being one teacher teaching to a number of students, he says that there should be a learning team involved in the students’ learning. Students should seek out experts or professionals in a project or field they want to study  and are passionate about, they should pick the learning outcomes, seek out resources, compile their learning teams and direct their learning. I think this is a valuable concept that deserves to be explored. It is an interesting concept that teacher-librarians would be integral in.3  The “General Capabilities” page in an ACARA article (as cited in Lori’s E-musings, 12 March 2019)4 provides much room to expand this concept. However, it also leaves great space for refining and crafting. It would be fascinating to explore it further.

The role of teacher-librarian is constantly growing and developing. Libraries and teacher-librarians have great scope for being managers of information, creators and facilitators and distributors of information.

References

1 and 2 O’Connell, J, n.d., Module 2: The Information Environment, Retrieved from Charles Sturt Universit website at https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42380_1&content_id=_2633951_1&mode=view

3 Create, Curate, Collaborate n.d., Retreived from Teacher-Librarian Learning Network’s blog at https://feedly.com/i/entry/5oT5ifkZN1JBXX3mX4pji4hWD0AUSB04SCT7+1+6tNQ=_1696a74271c:78409:5bce999a

4  Lori (2019), Information. Dissemination. influence. in Lori’s E-Musings Retrieved from https://lorikemusings.wordpress.com/2019/03/12/information-dissemination-influence/