geralt / Pixabay

At the beginning of this subject, when I shared my knowledge, understanding and experiences with digital narratives in the Discussion Forum, I was concerned about the limited exposure I had with teaching some e-texts and non-existent exposure to digital narratives in the form of software applications and interactive texts. Since that time, I have developed as an educational professional, my ideas are more clarified, informed and evolved as my experiences have proliferated. The evidence of my learning is demonstrated the educational digital narrative, The water cycle: How Splish recovered his Splash.

The value of digital storytelling, is not to give students technological busy work but meaningful learning. This is confirmed by a Canadian third and fourth grade educator, Michelle Cordy(?) (Paikin, 2013), the educational quality of a digital resource is a concern also noted in my blog entry. Walsh asserts there should be a synergy between the literary and technological elements that creates various layers of support (Walsh, 2013, p. 187-189). When Splishy was depressed, the photographs were drained of colour, darkening the mood which correlates with the words. The overlaid images emphasizes the action Drippy was taking to assist Splishy and the high camera angles support Splishy’s mood – creating illuminating that feeling that he is feeling insignificant.   Due to the target audience, being a combined year 7 and 8 class in the Special Education faculty with a Stage 2 ability, it was important to be quite literal, while still challenging the students who are more capable.

Limiting the distractions was an important consideration (Yokota and Teale, p. 581) (Walsh, 2013, p. 181-186) to create better flow and engagement with the narrative. In Assignment 2A, of the interactive digital narrative review, hotspots became real distractions and interfered with not only the enjoyment of the narrative but with the progress of the story. Therefore, I refrained from incorporating more facts, activities and information. Features included are as important as the ones excluded in the digital narrative.

Choice of an appropriate digital medium in which to present the narrative was of paramount importance. Book Creator seemed an excellent choice of software application as it incorporates interactive, multimodal features that support the needs of students with diverse needs (Rhodes & Milby, 2007, p. 255) (Travassaros, 2019, 4 October). In particular, these students would benefit from the option of having literacy support, such as the option to have text read to them, words highlighted as they progress, visual images and videos and interactive supports such as being able to type, draw or record their answers in true or false or multiple choice questions in their own individual texts. Additionally, it was beneficial to have the option to hyperlink resources and sites so that students can create or use them for inspiration to create further activities as discussed by Fuhler (2010, p. 148) and previously noted in my Discussion Forum post. However, not only primary-sourced documents are beneficial for creation of student’s own texts but also documents such as the Make a Cloud experiment where students have the opportunity to write up a procedure.

However, it is not without its limitations as set out in my Revised Proposal for Assessment 3which included restrictions in linking other platforms such as links with G Suite (n.d.) (which requires the school’s approval). This is needed to for students and teachers to access to individual e-books. I also found that initially my expectations were too high. The project expanded, underestimating the time and volume of work. Initially, the plan was for the narrative to include recycling, as well as the water cycle. However, this was not possible.

When planning the digital narrative, copyright and fair dealing considerations weighed heavily in my mind. The work presented in The water cycle: How Splish recovered his Splash is original. It was an original idea scripted from public websites that were not subject to copyright restrictions then storyboarded. Applicable referencing was noted. The characters were created from plasticine by the author. All photographs were taken by the author too. Hyperlinks have been referenced such as the aforementioned Make a Cloud experiment (Sydney Water, n.d.). A video titled Birds eye view of the ocean waves pursuant to Creative Commons licencing has been used.

Future developments, will facilitate more individualised education for all abilities. More technological tools will be available that facilitate multimodal literacies. It will also encourage collaboration, not only within the school for students but globally for educators too. The volume of information and progress of technology will continue to flourish. Our challenge, as educators will be maintaining current with learning technology, enabling our students to cope with today’s technology and preparing them for tomorrow’s – the latter being impossible to predict.

References:

Altman, G. (n.d.). Pixabay images. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com/users/geralt/. (The image has been sourced from Pixabay and is pursuant to Creative Commons Licence.)

Book Creator. (2011-2019). Book Creator [software application]. Retrieved from https://bookcreator.com/

Fuhler, C. J. (2010). Using primary-source documents and digital storytelling as a catalyst for writing historical fiction in the fourth grade (Ch. 11). In B. Moss, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Teaching new literacies in grades 4-6: Resources for 21st-century classrooms (pp. 136-150). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/csuau/reader.action?docID=465663&ppg=148

G Suite for Education. (n.d.). Spark learning with G suite for education. Retrieved from https://edu.google.com/products/gsuite-for-education/?modal_active=none

Make a Cloud. (n.d.). Sydney Water. Retrieved from http://www.sydneywater.com.au/web/groups/publicwebcontent/documents/document/zgrf/mdk5/~edisp/dd_099223.pdf

Miksanskiy, R. (Producer) (n.d.). Pexels. Retrieved from https://www.pexels.com/video/bird-s-eye-view-of-ocean-waves-1918465/ (Video was obtained under Creative Commons licence)

Rhodes, J. M. & Milby, T. M., (2007). Teacher-created electronic books: Integrating technology to support readers with disabilities. Reading Teacher, 61(3), 255-259. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=27349103&site=ehost-pve. DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.3.6

The Agenda with Steve Paikin. ( 2013, 5 October). Learning 2030: From books to screen [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=215NPpHsQPk

The Water Cycle. (n.d.) Sydney Water. Retrieved from http://www.sydneywater.com.au/web/groups/publicwebcontent/documents/document/zgrf/mdq3/~edisp/dd_047890.pdf

Travassaros, E. (2019, 14 July), Module 1.2: Evaluating digitally reproduced stories. Charles Sturt University discussion forum. Retrieved from https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_39502_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&conf_id=_76005_1&forum_id=_159417_1&message_id=_2347490_1

Travassaros, E. (2019, 24 July). Fast-paced digital buzz. Charles Sturt University ThinkSpace. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/ellene/2019/07/24/fast-paced-digital-buzz/

Travassaros, E. (2019, 31 August). INF533 Literature in digital environments, assignment 2 – part A, ‘The incredible tales of Weirdwood Manor’ interactive digital literature review , Charles Sturt University, Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/ellene/2019/08/31/interactive-digital-literature-review/

Travassaros, E. (2019, 4 October). INF533 Revised Proposal for Assessment 3. Charles Sturt University ThinkSpace. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/ellene/2019/10/04/inf533-revised-assessment-3/

Travassaros, E. (2019). The water cycle: How Splish recovered his Splash. Retrieved from https://app.bookcreator.com/books

Walsh, M. (2013). Literature in a digital environment (Ch. 13). In L. McDonald (Ed.), A literature companion for teachers. Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA) Retrieved from https://doms.csu.edu.au/csu/file/863c5c8d-9f3f-439f-a7e3-2c2c67ddbfa8/1/ALiteratureCompanionforTeachers.pdf

Yokota, J. & Teale, W. H. (2014). Picture books and the digital world: educators making informed choices. The Reading Teacher, 34(6). Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/3886534/Picture_Books_and_the_Digital_World_Educators_ Making_Informed_Choices