December 2019

You are browsing the site archives for December 2019.

Other Techniques for Collection Management

Techniques for collection measurement that could be used for e-resources are obtaining quantitative statistical data from digital resource suppliers about user access. Using data collection techniques to determine what e-resources are being used and the extent of that use. Comparing e-resources that deliver similar or the same curriculum initiatives and determining value for money in regards to access. Acquiring feedback from teachers that e-resources and other resources were accessible and appropriate. Ascertaining what are the strengths and weaknesses of the resources.

Other techniques could be in using library circulation statistics to determine what resources were borrowed. This may not always be an accurate indication of collection measurement as resources may be borrowed but not used. The school profile (eg:

socio-economic, ESL students, independent) and the preference for resources. Further determined by the use of circulation records on the library software programs which can indicate student and teacher interaction with resources within the school profile.

Teacher librarians using data to determine collection measurement of e-resources need to consider and place ‘ merit upon what data to collect and what criteria to employ which is harder to detect’ (Poli, 2001) to ensure accurate measurement.

To determine if using an output measure is realistic when creating a budget a teacher librarian must also
measure the knowledge and understanding obtained through the resource. As argued by
Kyrillidou & Giersch (2004, p. 438) say “[…] in order to discover whether a user has successfully used
an electronic resource, we need to instigate a transaction that will help us understand whether the
information discovery process has truly led to knowledge discovery”. If performance measurement,
then, is about numbers and counts, it is true that to make sense out of them, to help the process towards
the ultimate purpose, that “knowledge discovery”, which justifies a library’s existence, it is vital the
application of mixed assessment methods, deriving also from qualitative research and it is also most
important the direction investigations are taking towards impact and outcome measurement of digital
services on users’ communities.’
Reference:
Kyrillidou, M., Giersch, S. (2004) “Qualitative analysis of ARL E-metrics participant
feedback about the evolution of measures for networked electronic resources”,
Library quarterly, 74(4), pp. 423-440 [Online].
74(4) (Accessed:

5 October 2005).

Step 1 of 2
Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.
Skip to toolbar