Before commencing my studies, I knew there were many arguments about the benefits and downfalls of digital literature, including its tendency to distract (Clarke, 2019a). Over time, I discovered both sides of the debate were accurate; good digital stories can enhance the reading experience, whereas unnecessary, complicated or irrelevant texts can be detrimental. Quality digitisations utilise all the capabilities of our computerised world to allow access, support meaning, provide contemporary opportunities and reflect students’ personal worlds. The online world also enables individuals to use a plethora of tools to express their thoughts and ideas. Digital literacy isn’t just about reading and responding, it’s also about creating. Therefore, I have learnt the role of the education professional is to expose students to this world through targeted lessons and resources.
After I read a variety of digital texts, I was surprised to discover that some of my favourite stories were simple and straightforward (Clarke, 2019b). More complex multimodal combinations and layouts were distracting and hard to read if the visual, audio and interactive elements were extraneous. Distractions and disrupted reading can occur when hyperlinks and similar features are embedded in texts (Ross, Pechenkina, Aeschliman & Chase, 2017). It can also be difficult to adjust to the different pages of a text if various layouts, design elements and interactive features are utilised (Mascone, 2014). This is why education professionals need to teach students the language of digital texts and how they can navigate these types of stories (Simpson and Walsh, 2015). When used to support meaning, images and other multimodal elements can lead to critical understanding (Simpson and Walsh, 2015). I have learnt the most important part of a digital text should always be the story (Hardwick, 2018) and technology should be used to support or enhance the narrative.
Additionally, I have discovered teachers should introduce students to lessons and digital texts that reflect the broader worlds of students (Ng & Nicholas, 2016) because our pupils need to be able to read various text types in order to function in modern society. Incorporating students’ prior knowledge is also important because engagement and deeper comprehension is prompted when students are provided with opportunities to interact in familiar digital environments (Ng & Nicholas, 2016), such as those that mimic social media landscapes (McDonald and Danino, 2018). These types of texts provide students with a sense of community and a chance to collaborate with others (McDonald and Danino, 2018).
After reading the literature associated with this subject, it became evident that students need to create and experiment in order to learn the skills necessary to produce texts for a 21st Century audience. Initially I was focused on the benefits of reading digital texts, not the creation of digital texts. In particular, these types of activities enable students from diverse backgrounds to express themselves without the language barriers imposed by traditional forms of composition. For example, Johnson and Kendrick (2016) completed a study where teenagers from immigrant and refugee backgrounds were given a chance to share their stories in a digital format. The students involved were able to use images and music to tell traumatic stories they were unable to put into words. Another study (Laing, Moules, Estefan & Lang, 2017) explored the therapeutic benefits of digital storytelling in the case of adolescent cancer patients, demonstrating the flexibility and relevancy of multimodal texts. Education professionals must provide students with activities where they are able to express themselves digitally.
Reading digital narratives helped me understand why it is often better for teachers and librarians to create texts specifically for their school context. A lot of the literature does not cater to the specific needs of local school communities or it is out-of-date. However, after creating my own text, I realised this isn’t as easy it seems! When I posted my proposal to the INF533 discussion forum, the response was positive (Fawkes, 2019) and I felt optimistic about creating my website. I planned thoroughly and thought about it often, but my limited technical skills slowed the process. Therefore, this experience has showed me that it is important for educational professionals to collaborate because everyone has different technological skills and knowledge.
Through this subject (INF533), I was able to participate in valuable experiences that reflect the ways high school students interact with contemporary literature. In classrooms, we expect students to navigate and create digital texts, but we often haven’t completed these tasks ourselves. My eyes have been opened to the different ways students might respond to the activities I set, and I will endeavour to consider my own struggles with digital texts when I devise future lessons.
References:
Clarke, J. (2019a, July 28). INF533 assessment 1 [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/conanthelibrarian/2019/07/28/inf533-assessment-1/
Clarke, J. (2019b, August 26). Critical reflection of digital literature experience [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thinkspace.csu.edu.au/conanthelibrarian/2019/08/26/critical-reflection-of-digital-literature-experience/
Fawkes, A. (2019, September 8). RE: Assessment 3 digital storytelling proposal [Forum comment]. Retrieved from https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_39502_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&conf_id=_76005_1&forum_id=_159416_1&message_id=_2470085_1
Hardwick. L. (2018). Digital storytelling: media that makes a difference. In G. Brewer & R. Hogarth (Eds.), Creative education, teaching and learning [Palgrave Macmillan]. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1057/9781137402141
Johnson, L., & Kendrick, M. (2016). “Impossible is nothing”: expressing difficult knowledge through digital storytelling. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(6), 667-675. DOI: 10.1002/jaal.624
Laing, C., Moules, N., Estefan, A., & Lang, M. (2017). Stories that heal: understanding the effects of creating digital stories with pediatric and adolescent/young adult oncology patients. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 34(4), 272-282. DOI: 10.1177%2F1043454216688639
Mascone, C. (2014). Print it or forget it. Chemical Engineering Progress, 110(11), 3. Retrieved from https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep
McDonald, R., & Danino, N. (2018). Social media in education and the community. In G. Brewer & R. Hogarth (Eds.), Creative education, teaching and learning [Palgrave Macmillan]. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1057/9781137402141
Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2016). Understanding mobile digital worlds: how do Australian adolescents relate to mobile technology?. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 513-528. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2018.1523067
Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A-M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1976
Simpson, A., & Walsh, M. (2015). Children’s literature in the digital world: how does multimodality support affective, aesthetic and critical response to narrative?. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 14(1), 28-43. DOI: 10.1108/ETPC-12-2014-0005