August – A Biv at Uni

Basically, I have done a massive catch-up on the ETL401 course discussion posts today because I seem to have fallen incredibly behind. Is anyone else struggling to keep up with the discussion posts, blog posts, readings (plus ‘essential readings’) in this course?

3.2 The role of the TL

Organisation	Similarities	Differences
Herring	All 3 authors specifically state that TLs have a multifaceted, complicated, sometimes underestimated role in schools and discuss the different roles of TLs. They all agree that TLs should be and are an integral part of the school environment and not a stand-alone place/tool in the school toolbox. All 3 focus on the use of terms ‘media specialist’ and ‘media centre’ suggesting they have moved away from the traditional view of librarians as book monitors. Lamb (2011) and Herring (2007) both discuss the need for prioritisation of TL roles.	Herring (2007) discusses the use of school internet and intranet specifically.
Purcell		Purcell (2010) determined that the TL must be the one to define their role for clear expectations of all staff.
Lamb

How should TLs prioritise the roles they play in the school?

TL roles will be different in each school environment as each one is different with different needs. Purcell (2010) suggests that TLs be in charge of defining their roles to ensure clarity of expectations amongst staff. I agree that TLs must have a large input into the determination of their role but, I also believe that this definition must be a collaborative decision between TL, teaching staff and executive. This collaboration will help develop the TL role as a best fit to the school needs and, from there, TLs can prioritise which roles they take on and justify why.

Are there other roles played by TLs eg social roles?

Of course. From personal experience, I have been able to initiate quiet play groups, student support groups and reading support groups during library and play time to support student social development. I would suggest that TLs are in a prime position to support social skill development and establish a quiet place for play for those students requiring additional social support.

How do Lamb’s views on the TL’s role compare and contrast with those of Herring and Purcell?

See table above.

What existing tasks/roles do you think you, as a TL, could give up in order to be as proactive as Lamb and Valenza want you to be?

I definitely think ‘website devleoper’ could be something to hand off to other staff while maintaining minimal contributions to advertise the library and its events/content. Additionally, the collaborative development of programs with class teachers would lighten the TL load significantly.

Would you change the order of the roles Purcell identifies eg should teacher come first?

Personally, I don’t believe Purcell (2010) intended to list the roles with one being more important than another. The layout of the paper simply resulted in this being the assumption. Looking at the diagram on Page 31 of the article, you will see that all roles surround the School Media Specialist role, equally placed. I think that each TL will prioritise these roles depending on the need at the time and should remain fluid throughout their role to reprioritise as needed.

Reference

Herring, J. (2007). Teacher librarians and the school library. In S. Ferguson (Ed.) Libraries in the twenty-first century: charting new directions in information (p. 27-42). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 3]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899459_1

Lamb, A. (2011). Bursting with potential: Mixing a media specialist’s palette. Techtrends: Linking research & practice to improve learning, 55(4), 27-36. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 3]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899459_1

Purcell, M. (2010). All librarians do is check out books right? A look at the roles of the school library media specialist. Library media connection 29(3), 30-33. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 3]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899459_1

3.3 The Principal and the TL

Currently, I am working alongside a wonderful Principal in a very small school and I find her support imperative to achieve just about anything. As I am new to the school, she as an invaluable font of information on previous library processes and the community. Additionally, she is very open minded and willing to listen to new ideas like Drop Ins for kids and parents after school as we don’t have enough staff to have the library open during lunch time.

As for myself, I am able to use my knowledge of technology and experience with developing research and technology skills to supplement areas she is unfamiliar with. Currently, we are planning a history unit together that will differentiate and support Stage 2 and 3 and other collaborative projects that will benefit the school, as suggested by Fitzgerald (2019). I am lucky that she is supportive of all staff and recognises that the library and the TL have a big impact on the student development of reading and writing skills (Bonanno, 2011).

I think that true collaboration (Montiel-Overall, 2005; Langford, 2008) is key, particularly in such a small school. By supporting me in my goal to develop inquiry skills, my principal is giving me the opportunity to support other staff in their classroom programs which, in turn, support her position as principal in the development of student skills and achievements. Additionally, having a supportive executive encourages me to involve myself more fully in the community of the school and potentially invest more time and effort into the school environment and development.

With that said, I don’t think the Principal/TL relationship is exclusive and that it must also include teaching and admin staff for the whole system to work.

References

Bonanno, K. (2011). Opinion: Do school libraries really make a difference? Incite 32/5 Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/inCiteALIA/2011/97.pdf

Fitzgerald, L. (2019). The role of the teacher librarian (TL). In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 4]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899464_1

Langford, L. (2008). Collaboration: Force or forced, Part 2, 27/1, 31-37. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 4]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899464_1

Montiel-Overall (2005). Toward a theory of collaboration for teachers and librarians, School library media research 8/1-31 In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 3]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899459_1

3.4 Accountability in practice

Previously, I have used exit tickets and video and still photography to collect and analyse data in classroom environments and would definitely utilise both again as they provide immediate evidence of engagement and student input into the relevance, enjoyment and understanding of topics.

Additionally, with the development of inquiry learning occurring at my school, I predict I will be assessing and giving feedback on students inquiry projects.

I would like to use digital libraries to assess student reading levels but, in my small school, it will be some time before that is able to be taught to the students and rolled out simply due to their technology skill levels.

4.1a Search activity

Garrison, K. L., FitzGerald, L. & Sheerman, A. (2018). ‘Just let me go at it’: Exploring students’ use and perceptions of guided inquiry, 21. Available from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182159.pdf

I chose this article for a few reasons that interested me:

Use of mixed-method information gathering
What do students think GI is?
What do students think of GI? How useful/helpful it is to them?
Australian school used as sample

Unfortunately, the sampled students were in secondary school, not primary so, to recreate this research in my own interest area would require tweaking of methods and questions. Additionally, there was no comment on how long students had been involved with GI nor how intensely.

Still, an interesting read to determine the impression and, to some extent, the success of GI in the eyes of Year 9 students.

4.1b Inquiry learning

Are the acquisitions of 21^st century skills and the focus on accountability mutually exclusive?

Not at all. Currently, I believe there is too great a focus on accountability of teachers to see their students achieve specific outcomes eg Basic Skills Tests, NSW. However, there maintains an element of necessity in regards to accountability- teachers and TLs must have guidance in keeping education relatively uniform so we can say that students are graduating school with at least basic levels of reading and writing.

The development of 21^st century skills is vital in order to produce students who are successful in life OUTSIDE of school. That said, the skills they need to develop in school must be more than the traditional reading, writing and arithmetic. They must become creative, flexible thinkers, familiar with developing technologies and developing new ideas to support the transformative world they will be working and living in (Tucker, 2014). The use of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Guided Inquiry (GI) in schools is one way to help develop students problem solving, interest in investigation and lateral thinking.

References

Tucker, M. S. (2012). Tucker’s lens: On 21^st century skills. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 4]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899464_1

4.2 The challenges

Having worked in the UK for 2 years, I was able to experience their planning and assessment procedures, which included team RFF time each week for teachers on the same stage to collaborate on planning, resulting in a lowered workload and similar lessons and topics being covered across the stage. This collaboration made work days shorter, stress loads lighter and encouraged a positive, collegial environment.

Unfortunately, in Australia I have noted a divide between teachers, rather than a willingness to collaborate, with many CTs reluctant to share their programs, lessons and resources. This is improving slowly with the development of online environments such as Teachers Pay Teachers and communities like Butterfly Wings, created specifically for sharing programs.

Unfortunately, due to confusion over the roles of TL (Fitzgerald, 2019), CT reluctance to share or ‘lose’ their programs and lessons and potential personality clashes, the concept of collaboration, particularly with TLs is something that needs to be approached sensitively and depending on the person or people you would aim to work alongside. I think it is important to clearly outline the expectations eg this collaboration will be used in classes ABC and these people with have these responsibilities. Additionally, it must be clear that ALL parties will be receiving credit and contributing to the assessment of the unit/lesson to continue to review, adapt and improve the final product.
Another way to approach the topic of collaboration, aside from reassuring all credits are shared, would be to suggest the lightening of the workload- for example, I an teaching an enquiry unit currently, based on the history topic for Stage 2 and 3. We are learning how to search for information while gathering information on a familiar topic which students can take back to class to contribute to their in-class learning. Additionally, I am keeping assessment records of information gathering and IT use for end of year reports.
In short, Bonanno (2011) explains that TLs and libraries contribute to literacy results, development of ICT capabilities, information learning and staff professional development amongst other things. Utilising TLs in this way can potentially lighten the load for overworks CTs and provide another avenue for student assessment in various areas, including literacy, speaking and listening and ICT development. Unlike CTs, TLs have the space and potentially the opportunity to introduce inquiry based learning to students initially, which can then be traken into classrooms. Alternatively, TLs can support students in inquiry based learning in the library, sharpening skills already being used in the classroom (Fitzgerald, 2019).

I think that true collaboration (Montiel-Overall, 2005; Langford, 2008) is key, particularly in such a small school. By supporting me in my goal to develop inquiry skills, for example, my principal is giving me the opportunity to support other staff in their classroom programs which, in turn, support her position as principal in the development of student skills and achievements. Additionally, having a supportive executive encourages me to involve myself more fully in the community of the school and potentially invest more time and effort into the school environment and development.

References

Bonanno, K. (2011). Opinion: Do school libraries really make a difference? Incite 32/5 Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/inCiteALIA/2011/97.pdf

Butterfly Wings at https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=butterfly%20wings

Teachers Pay Teachers at https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/

4.3_1 Curriculum creation and delivery at my school

I would say that the development and delivery of curriculum at my school generally follows the Curriculum Design Principles from Review of the Curriculum Report (Fitzgerald, 2019) with a specific focus on relevance to the local environment and community and development of parent-friendly language.
Staff have the freedom to create, buy or source units of work that fit into the scope and sequence of each subject, which has been designed collaboratively with other CTs, executive and TLs. In terms of assessment, each CT addresses this in their own way but, I have noticed a large swing towards Wiggins and McTighe’s (2005) ‘backward design’ and this is a process I prefer, myself.
As I am working at an exceptionally small school, with a forward-thinking, open minded principal, we are lucky enough to be able to tailor learning to the needs of our students so long as we continually make links back to the social and local environment in order to make learning relevant to our students.

References

Review of the Australian curriculum final report (2014). Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/36269 In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 4]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899464_1

Wiggins, G.& McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (Ed. 2) Association for supervision and curriculum development (ASCD): Alexandria, Va. In ETL401: Introduction to teacher librarianship, [Module 4]. Retrieved from Charles Sturt University website: https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_42381_1&content_id=_2899464_1

4.3_2 The TL and curriculum

From personal experience and further reading, I believe it is important to develop a school environment that is inclusive and collaborative. To achieve this, it is important that all staff are involved in curriculum development and planning with the opportunity to comment, critique and support changes. By including TLs, CTs have the opportunity to help expand student thinking and impress that learning does not occur in a vacuum (Lamb, 2011). Additionally, there is potential for the improvement of current resources or the development of new resources by utilising TL experience and specialities.

It is realistic, I think, for principals to expect their staff to work collaboratively in schools in order to ensure a flowing, positive environment that supports learners. By planning units of work together, staff are potentially sharing the workload, ensuring a second look over of programs to determine their suitability and relevance to students, ensuring strong links to learning.

By not including TLs in curriculum planning, staff are risking a disconnect between classroom and library. This would not benefit students as the library should be used as a place to sharpen research skills and consolidate learning. By leaving out TLs and the library from programming, staff are potentially saying that the learning occurring in their room has no relevance outside of it, lessening student connection and the opportunity for deeper learning. Additionally, there is the potential for clashing or repeating programs.

References

Tag: August

ETL401 Week 5-7 Discussion Posts