Module 1: Reflections & Tasks
This module introduces the pros and cons for digital and physically printed literacy utilising some excellent videos and articles.
In particular, I was drawn to the article ‘What is a book in the digital age’ by Her comparison of eBooks and pBooks (printed books) in modern day, contains both pros and cons for each print-type, rather than just spruiking the benefits of eBooks, as is common in so many articles. She also takes the time to explain why young adults and children may not feel the same nostalgia for print books as their older counterparts- largely (though it sounds obvious once it’s written down) because they have not had the same enriched experiences as the older generations with print. Many young people have grown up with immediate and constant access to digital technology and so have not developed a fondness or even a relationship with printed media. Some academics initially coined the term ‘digital natives’ for these generations of digitally plugged-in children, but have since withdrawn and arguably disproved this notion throughout various studies.
I adored the animation ‘How fiction can change reality’ and its reminder to respect the classics but always try something new. Personally, there are few ‘classics’ that I have read as I find them clunky and old-world in a way that I can’t connect to. My dad and I had a conversation about Tom Sawyer and he was shocked that I hadn’t ever read it in school- it was a staple during his education- and that I had no interest in picking it or Moby Dick up. He was also forced to read Sense and Sensibilities at school, a classic that he despised for various reasons. It wasn’t until we unravelled that he had no connection or interest in the period, characters or plot, that he was able to understand my lack of interest in a story like Tom Sawyer. I understand that the classics hold important lessons, but so do modern texts which have, more often than not, admittedly borrowed from classics, but wrap the lesson in a more relatable setting.
Lamb (2011) discusses the modern definition of ‘reading’ and ‘books’ and all those terms can encompass. I believe that reading can include graphics, audio embellishment and interactivity on a digital scale. All of these things, though not necessarily part of a traditional ‘book’ or ‘reading’ experience, help construct a story, enrich world building and contribute to ongoing literacy skills. I am a big fan of the graphic novel and its ability to engage reluctant readers. Admittedly, Lamb (2011) acknowledges the potential difficulties in utilising these mediums (resource availability, cost, skill requirements, technical difficulties and transfer of skills) but is clear in her support engaging with these different styles of reading may be the key to nurturing life-long readers into the future
Joe Sabia: The technology of storytelling is a brilliant example of how storytelling has evolved and is continuing to do so!
Module 1.2 Task
Discussion Forum: Evaluating digitally reproduced stories
After completing the above readings, consider Walsh’s chapter, and share your knowledge, understanding and experiences with digital narratives in the subject forum. What are the key points of synergy that you have encountered? What are the differences?
Add your comments in the Subject Forum.
I have seen digital narratives utilised, largely in a K-2 setting, as a whole class study and as part of small group rotations. Prior to independent work, all students should be introduced to the traditional concepts of reading to provide them with a supportive launch pad into literacy (Walsh, 2013). With a focus on picture books and early readers, I have noticed the necessity for the inclusion of audio help or a read-to button, which helps students identify new words, how they are pronounced and, sometimes what they mean. Additionally, there are options to change text style, size and colour to cater to individual needs and to change the voices, volume and reading speed. However, these programs do not offer decoding strategies for students to build on.
Throughout the use of digital literature, it remains the duty of the educator to ensure the quality of the text, as in traditional resourcing. This includes ensuring the language used is related directly to the visuals and the pronunciations must be in a relatively local dialect to be useful eg Australian English versus the UK or US English. Additionally, all content must, in some way, relate to syllabus and curriculum documentation so students are working towards an achievable goal while enjoying, engaging and interacting with quality texts (Walsh, 2013).
Walsh, M. (2013). Literature in a digital environment (Ch. 13). In L. McDonald (Ed.), A literature companion for teachers. Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA). https://doms.csu.edu.au/csu/file/863c5c8d-9f3f-439f-a7e3-2c2c67ddbfa8/1/ALiteratureCompanionforTeachers.pdf
Module 1.3 Task
Discussion Forum: Trends in digital literature
Undertake some reading and research to find further evidence and/or information about the developments and new directions in digital literature. What issues have emerged for you?
Share your ideas in the forum, and add links to the Knowledge Networks diigo space. Be sure to add INF533 as one of the tags.
I found a brilliant TED talk I found via Diigo: The essential elements of digital literacies: Doug Belshaw at TEDxWarwick – YouTube
The concept of ‘digital literacies’ as plural, rather than a sequenced model targeting one type of literacy, seemed strange to me at first, possibly because I have worked in education systems that spruik the one ‘digital literacy plan’ (to rule them all!). When I understood that there are different types of literate eg social, civic, critical etc, as discussed in the video, it made more sense, as did the ‘remixing’ Belshaw (TEDx Talks, 2012) describes. Additionally, I enjoyed the idea of finding a common ground between ‘important issues’ and ‘areas of interest’ to develop digital literacies- any teacher knows that planning around student interests usually gains the most engagement, as people want to enjoy what they are learning about.
A common concern I found throughout the literature, was the suspicion that rural schools will encounter difficulties in adapting to these new types of literature (Herold, 2015; Salemink, Strijker & Bosworth, 2015). These concerns arose primarily due to isolation, lack of resources and lack of technical support and staff specialising in ICT and digital literature. Additionally, ongoing support and training for staff will be necessary to maintain useful programs that are relevant to student learning and the curriculum.
References
TEDx Talks (2012, March 22). The essential elements of digital literacies: Doug Belshaw at TEDxWarwick [Video] Youtube.
Herold, B. (2015, July 29). Freedom to experiment presents challenges for school innovation networks. Education week, 34(37), 10-11.
Lamb, A. (2011). Reading redefined for a transmedia universe. Learning and Leading with Technology, 39(3), 12-17. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=67371172&site=ehost-live
Salemink, K., Strijker, D. & Bosworth, G. (2015, September 26). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
