ETL503- Module 2: Developing collections

Module 2.1: Selection in the school context: Discussion Forum 2.1

Using the Charles Sturt University Library Primo search or Google Scholar, conduct a search for a recent article in English that discusses patron driven acquisition.

Similarly to others, I found it difficult to find more recent articles on this topic, most falling into the 2013-2015 period or prior. Rather than start new, I was able to locate the same text as Cassandra and chose to add on to her post.

Jurczyk, E., Pagotto, S., Moisil, I., Grewal, K., Cassadt, S., Cato, J. (2020). Long-term usage of a consortial PDA collection: If they choose it, will we use it?. Collection Management, 45(4), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2019.1702912

Key words/phrases

Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA)
data analysis
collection development
academic libraries
pilot

Module 2.1: Professional Reflection

Think about responsibility for resource selection. You may like to use one or more of the following questions to write some blog posts.

Discuss how the teacher librarian’s expertise and role is different from that required by all teachers.

While the role of Teacher Librarians (TLs) has changed over time (Ciccone & Hounslow, 2019; Cole, 2016), it has been recognised that it is often a dense and complex position (Merga, 2020) and so I will keep my response here brief.

Let us begin, initially, with the expertise required to attain a Masters degree to be ‘officially qualified’ as a teacher librarian in NSW Public Schools. While there are numerous TLs operating without ‘official’ qualifications, the Department of Education encourages TLs to gain their Masters and become dual-qualified teachers (Merga, 2020). While some classroom teachers come into education on a Masters, on the back of an alternate career, the TL role is the only one I can think of that specifically requires dual qualifications off the bat. This study arms the TL with the skills and knowledge of specialised programs to develop and maintain the school collections.

In my experience, the TL is required to be aware of a scope of resources kept within the library space, those maintained elsewhere in the school and those maintained in a virtual environment through various platforms (Merga, 2020). In contrast, classroom teachers, though often aware of resources to suit their own stage or subject will rarely be fully aware of the entire scope of resources available to staff as students simply because their time and energy is taken up by other tasks not applicable to TLs.

TLs require highly developed collaborative skills, as do all staff, to communicate with the school community and outside parties to ensure relevant quality resources are being identified for reasonable prices. Networking with other local school and council libraries is a necessary part of the role to enrich student learning, develop collaborative programs and host extracurricular programs to benefit students and the school community.

TLs are often encouraged to develop and host extracurricular programs, usually during lunch or recess breaks (Merga, 2020). Personally, these have included art club, book club, writing club, student-led tutoring, choir, debating and a quiet place out of the ruckus of the main playground. Most TLs I know are amenable to these activities, within reason and will often be found hosting at least one extracurricular activity in their own time. *Most classroom teachers (CTs) are not pressured to undertake quite as many extracurriculars in my experience.

Finally, the in-school collaborative effort TLs must put in goes above those of the usual CT as the library is considered another arm of the literacy branch in education and so many schools run programs within their library directly linked to the literacy curriculum and programs being run in classrooms (Merga, 2020). This requires TL flexibility to adapt their programs to support specific classroom learning, expertise in core curriculum subjects and allowing someone else to be the captain of their proverbial ship.

*Most because we all know those CTs who go above and beyond their required duties

Share ideas on how teacher librarians might effectively collaborate with the school community in the selection of resources in a school with which you are familiar.

This year, I worked with staff and the Principal to identify an online platform of non-fiction resources to support literacy engagement in the school, school targets and staff programming. I was placed ‘in-charge’ of the development of this platform, its core uses in the school, communication to the community regarding this platform and educating staff on its various uses.

Additionally, I worked with staff on collating a list of resources to support their current and future programs, across various KLAs. We then collaboratively developed a proposal to take to the Principal and the P&C in an effort to request funding for these resources. Our request was successful and I was able to source, order and accession these resources in time for staff to access and teach alongside their programming.

Consider also how to engage your learners in selection of resources for their school library.

In my library space, I always have two tables available for students to peruse that are changed out regularly. One table is the ‘new in’ table where the newly accessioned resources, both fiction and non-fiction are displayed. The other table has to do with what students are learning in-class eg the life cycle of a butterfly or important days of the year eg Remembrance Day. Both these tables attract quite a lot of attention and give life to resources that, at times, have not been borrowed in quite some time.

Who should have the final say on what is included? Why?

In the end, I believe the TL should have the final say, so long as the acquisition process allows for the equal input of all contributing parties including; CTs, Principals, students, community, TL and any other staff engaging with students and the school eg teachers aides etc. I believe this because the TL, presumably, has developed expertise over time regarding staff requirements, student interests, school direction and current collection content. TLs should be open to suggestion but maintain final say as they are the experts in the development and maintenance of their collection.

References

Ciccone, A. & L. Hounslow (2019). Re-envisioning the role of academic librarians for the digital learning environment: The Case of UniSA Online. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1). Implementing online learning: Stories from the field, Article 11. Available at https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss1/11

Cole, L. (2016). BiblioTech as the re-imagined public library: Where will it find you? Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2016- Columbus, OH- Connections. Collaboration. Community. in Session 213- Metropolitan Libraries.

Merga, M. K. (2020). School librarians as literacy educators within a complex role. Journal of library administration, 60(8), 889-908. DOI: 10.1080/01930826.2020.1820278

Module 2.2: The balanced collection: Discussion Forum: 2.2

Discuss the pros and cons of buying bundled sets of resources, for instance a journal database or a Standing Orders service.
Consider also the pros and cons of selecting content that is provided via online access but which the library does not own.

Physical sets eg Standing Orders

Pros

Set and forget order service- you can establish this at the beginning of the year and receive a lovely parcel every three months
Books are usually award-winning, closely examined and aligned to the Aust Curriculum
Provides a range of resources (fiction & non-fiction) to get students excited over new topics

Cons

TLs have no control over the content
Some texts may be irrelevant to your context
Some texts may date quickly
These are often expensive outputs at the beginning (or end) of the year

Online eg ClickView/World Book Online