Digital Scholarship: An Interpretive Essay

Digital Scholarship as Constructivist Leadership

Embed from Getty Images
Introduction
If teachers want reform in education, they will need to be directly involved in this journey, rather than simply be objects of study (Lierberman, 1992). This paper, therefore, positions digital scholarship in the secondary school setting as an emerging practice that has the potential to transform education, learning and teaching. The wider context is one where “experts” spend a lot of time talking about teachers and their work, yet, often exclude the voice of teachers themselves and their lived experiences in classrooms (Ryan, et al., 2017). With the intent of liberating scholarly practice from “the academy” (O’Toole & Beckett, 2016, p. 15), an inclusive view of “teacher as scholar” (Ryan, et al.) is presented. This inclusive view is supported by a perception that “in a digital, networked, open world people become less defined by the institution to which they belong and more by the network and online identity they establish” (Weller, 2011, p. 12). Emerging technologies and practices are those “not defined by [their] newness, [are] coming into being, not-yetness: and [have] unfulfilled but promising potential” (Veletsianos, 2016 p. 7). Furthermore, digital scholarship in the context of secondary education is also interpreted as “constructivist leadership” (Lowery, 2016).

Networked Participatory Scholarship
Tensions exist in literature as to how to describe and define scholarly activity that builds a reputation via social media tools typified by Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Voicethread and blogs, thereby building a “nimbus of social” around scholarly impetus (Educause, 2014). Exploration of this scholarly Web 2.0 enabled activity drives us towards concepts of digital scholarship whilst encountering terms such as “social”, “conversational”, “open” as well as “Networked Participatory Scholarship” (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012 p. 778). Furthermore, depending on the context of discussions, we discover that individuals who employ digital tools in their scholarship are described as social scholars, open scholars or digital scholars (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012). Digital scholarship includes a range of scholarly and emerging practices, such as digital, networked and open (Weller, 2011). However, Veletsianos and Kimmons’ (2012) description of the emergent practice of Networked Participatory Scholarship is intriguing as it goes “beyond digital scholarship in both scope and value” (p. 768). This discussion takes ownership of this term as it encompasses the scholar’s “use of participatory technologies and online social networks to share, reflect upon, critique, improve, validate, and further their scholarship” (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012, p. 768). This critical approach appears to explicitly support an approach to digital scholarship as a way of academically informing practice.

Teacher as Scholar
The concept of teacher as scholar is not without precedent (Parsegian, 1976; Worrell, 1965) but a rekindling of an older view of teacher as scholar and researcher (Chall, 1986) that rests on the assumption that teachers can transform the scholarship of teaching (Greenhow, Robelia & Hughes, 2009). There are many different interpretations of what constitutes scholarship and how to describe it (Weller, 2011, p. 50) and therefore, the ensuing exploration is anchored in the Boyer model of scholarship (Boyer, 1990). This model, often perceived as institution-centric, is known for its clarity in identifying four separate but overlapping scholarly functions, namely Discovery, Integration, Application and Teaching, also described as the DIAT structure (Garnett & Ecclesfield, 2011). This dynamic and capacious view of scholarship as offered by Boyer acknowledges that “knowledge is generated and acquired not just through research but through teaching as well” (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012, p. 767). This is an essential idea to hold onto while exploring digital scholarship in the secondary education setting. The following discussion journeys through Boyer’s framework, as shown in Figure 1 below, so as to provide a lens to provide clarity to digital scholarship in secondary schools.

Figure 1 Boyer’s Scholarly Framework

Scholarship of Discovery
The scholarship of discovery is about research and commitment to freedom of inquiry in a disciplined fashion. It is about thinking freely and seeing propositions of every kind in ever changing light (Boyer, 1990). How might digital scholarship be interpreted in this context of discovery, to liberate lived experiences of education?

Educational research has been democratised so that research is not just the prerogative of the university. By participating in descriptive, interpretive and change-oriented research (O’Toole & Beckett, 2016) the teacher is able to participate in “scholarly responsible [work]… [to discover new] “ways of seeing”…[and to] “test and/or seek verification of established knowledge” (p. 5). This is potentially liberating work in a school setting where teachers are often called to adopt evidence based and data driven practice (Punch & Oancea, 2014; McMillan & Schumacher, 2014) whilst also not having access to scholarly work that is held in journals hidden behind paywalls. In this realm of knowledge discovery, we can interpret Networked Participatory Scholarship as a potential framework to support the burgeoning tradition in education for critical and democratic analysis (Selwyn, 2010). Teachers-scholars in this context should support context-rich research of the often compromised and constrained social realities of technology use “on the ground” in educational settings (Selwyn, 2010).

The context of educational research is one where “today’s technologies are most significant in terms of the ways in which they alter people’s relationships with information and knowledge” (Selwyn, 2016, Loc 1867). Furthermore, in this context the ontological separation of teachers, learners and knowledge is giving way to postmodern views and net-aware theories of learning such as connectivism (Anderson & Dron, 2011; Siemens, 2004; Wheeler, 2012). This renegotiation has significant implications for how knowledge from research in the school setting is encountered. The digital scholar can once again provide transformational leadership by encouraging descriptive and interpretive research (O’Toole & Beckett, 2016). However, as a constructivist leader (Lowery, 2016) they also promote reflective and reflexive practice by exploring ideas that “knowledge is inexorably socially bound” (Lowery, 2016, p. 49).

In schools now typified by comprehensive digital learning environments (Veletsianos, 2016), which themselves are an emerging technology (Martindale & Dowdy, 2016), knowledge constructed from classroom based research, can be disseminated via social networking tools and distributed into networks of practice (Brown & Duguid, 2000). Findings can be quickly published on teacher personal web pages, blogs or open access journals and “join the emergent practice of scholars’ use of participatory technologies and online social networks to share, reflect upon, critique, improve, validate and further their scholarship” (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012). The digital scholar, as constructivist leader and researcher, in this instance contributes to the collective knowledge (Downes, 2012) of digital networks.

According to theories of social constructivism (Anderson & Dron, 2011; Anderson, 2016) new ways of seeing may also emerge from such social online interaction. Therefore, in the school system, the digital scholar is a leader who is aware that learning can take place through interaction, in both physical and digital spaces, and where learning is dialogic; with an emphasis on co-creation of knowledge with others (Selwyn, 2016, Loc 1920). These are emerging but potentially significant changes in how a learning community might generate new knowledge, call upon contemporary accounts of technology, knowledge, learning and pedagogy. In this context, digital scholarship can be interpreted as a community endeavour.

Scholarship of Integration
“By integration we mean making connections across the disciplines, placing the specialties in larger context, illuminating data in a revealing way, often educating non-specialists, too” (Boyer, 1990, p. 18).

The University of Adelaide describes the scholarship of integration as “what you know + what I know can = new paths to new knowledge” (University of Adelaide, n.d). This is about enabling knowledge to be opened out by networked effects and used in an inter-disciplinary manner (Garnett & Ecclesfield, 2017). This interdisciplinary practice is driven by a desire and ability to share (Weller, 2011) and with attitudes of openness can result in production and publishing of open education resources (Weller, 2011). These digital artefacts can be published with permissions to be reused, redistributed, revised, remixed and freely shared across digital networks. This ethos of openness is about sharing and being generous (Tedx Talks, 2010). It is interesting to note that these digital strategies mirror Boyer’s call to “move beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries, communicate with colleagues in other fields, and discover patterns that connect” (Boyer, 1990, p. 20). Once again, the networked and participatory scholar does this by making use of digital networks, and enacting relevant open education literacies (Kimmons, 2014). As a co-creation activity classroom students would also be called into this creative process by making use of these OER resources or publishing remixed versions; and thereby practicing visible scholarship.

Within the context of Scholarship of Integration, the digital scholar therefore pushes interdisciplinary approaches to learning to the centre of teaching practice. In this context Digital Scholarship takes place in “overlapping [academic] neighbourhoods” (Boyer, 1990, p. 19).

Scholarship of Application
Also known as scholarship of engagement, this third element asks “How can knowledge be responsibly applied to consequential problems?” (Boyer, 1990, p. 21). This form of scholarship is not just about citizenship nor is it about knowledge “first ‘discovered’ and then ‘applied’ (Boyer, 1990, p. 23). It is about reflective practice and making knowledge useful, moving from theory to practice, and from practice back to theory. (Boyer, 1990; Boyer, 1996). Boyer talks about building bridges and building better lives. For the digital scholar, this can be seen as a metaphor for building digital bridges and again manipulating digital networks as a democratic process to serve the interests of the larger community (Boyer, 1996).

This is a call for action to the Networked Participatory Scholar to activate digital skills and pedagogical knowledge to improve global communities. Such an approach is exemplified by a number of collaborative projects. For instance, The Flat Classroom Project (Lindsay & Davis, 2010) brings middle and senior high school students together in a global collaborative effort. As a clear example of the application of knowledge of digital literacies and networked practices, this project aims to transform learning through global collaboration. A second example is the ‘Code the Future’ global community that brings together educators and technology developers to assist with students with coding (Code The Future, n.d.). In this application of knowledge, the Networked Participatory Scholar again acts as a constructivist leader by embracing “new spaces for democratic dialogue and acts of social justice” (Lowery, 2016) and that theory leads to practice and practice also leads to theory (Boyer, 1990).

Scholarship of Teaching
“[I]nspired teaching keeps the flame of scholarship alive.” (Boyer 1990, p. 24).

 This is a site of an “uncertain pedagogical adventure characterised by novel modes of subjective engagement” (Atkinson, 2015, p. 43) and where the networked participatory scholar may push past dominant conceptions of pedagogy. We began within a context of teaching practitioner as researcher that broke down the false dichotomy between practice and research, that still influences our education system (O’Toole & Beckett, 2010). So, it is too at this site of teaching where pedagogy can promote “subjects/entities [to] emerge from the relationship that do not exist prior to it” (Atkinson). Thus, in this context digital scholarship promotes teaching as a “reflective dialogic practice promoting learning” (Garnett & Ecclesfield, 2011, p. 15) while “participating in the perpetual Beta of knowledge creation through the co-creation of learning” (Garnett & Ecclesfield, 2011, p. 15). Atkinson calls this “pedagogies of the not known” (p. 46) and “pedagogical practices as creative encounters” (p. 52). In this context, the networked and participatory scholar advances learning theory through contextual research and practice, brokers new learning experiences and develops open students (Garnett & Ecclesfield, 2011).

The assumption here is that the practice of digital scholarship will make use of participatory technologies and online social networks to share, critique and improve the scholarship of teaching. The classrooms become the beginning of a journey towards social learning where understanding is socially constructed by participation in “open participatory learning ecosystems” (Brown & Adler, 2008) and learning consists of the ability to traverse these open, digital networks (Downes, 2012).

 Conclusion
“We acknowledge that these four categories, and of teaching – divide intellectual functions that are tied inseparably to each other.” (Boyer, 1990)

In the school setting networked and participatory scholars give voice to reform. Working in the space where digital, networked and open approaches to teaching and learning converge they act as constructivist leaders and actively encourage community practice. The digital scholarship that they promulgate bridges theory with practice and pays homage to Boyer’s viewpoint that knowledge is not developed in a linear fashion and teaching shapes both research and practice. The digital practitioner-scholar embodies agile leadership in new cultures of digital learning whilst venturing into the realm of knowledge networks and digital innovation.

References

Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.) Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120258

Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning12(3), 80-97.

Atkinson, D. (2015). The adventure of pedagogy, learning and the not-known. Subjectivity8(1), 43-56.

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for The Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved from: https://depts.washington.edu/gs630/Spring/Boyer.pdf

Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11-20

Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16-20.

Brown, J, S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Retrieved from http://www.johnseelybrown.com/knowledgeorganization.html

Code The Future. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from http://www.codefuture.org/about

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/58207

Educause. (2014). Bryan Alexander: A digital scholarship scenario [Video File]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/Xo4KBJnW-zs

Garnett, F., & Ecclesfield, N. (2011). Towards a framework for co-creating open scholarship. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 5-17.

Kimmons, R. M. (2014). Developing open education literacies with practicing K-12 teachers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning15(6). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1964/3133

Lieberman, A. (1992). The meaning of scholarly activity and the building of community. Educational researcher, 21(6), 5-12.

Lindsay, J., & Davis, V. (2010). Navigate the digital rapids. Learning & Leading with Technology37(6), 12-15.

Lowery, C. L. (2016). The scholar–practitioner ideal. Journal of School Leadership. 26, 34-60.

Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2016). Issues in research, design, and development of personal learning environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.) Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120258

McMillan, J, H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry [Kindle Version]. Retrieved from http://ww.amazon.com.au

O’Toole, J., & Beckett, D. (2013). Educational research: Creative thinking and doing (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Parsegian, V. P. (1976). The teacher as scholar. Journal of Teacher Education. 27(4), 301.

Punch, K.F., & Oancea, A.E. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education (Kindle version]. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com.au

Ryan, M., Taylor, M., Barone, A., Della Pesca, L., Durgana, S., Ostrowski, K., Piccirillo, T., & Pikaard, K. (2017). Teacher as researcher, teacher as scholar and teacher as leader. The New Educator, 13(2), 102-116.

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism. A learning theory for the digital age [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://www.elearnspace.org/articles/connectivism.htm

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates [Kindle version]. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com.au

TeDx Talks. (2010). TEDxNYED – David Wiley – 03/06/10. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/Rb0syrgsH6M

University of Adelaide. (n.d.) Boyer scholarship reconsidered. Retrieved from: https://www.adelaide.edu.au/professions/pedagogical-possibilities/scholarship/boyer/#

Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766-774.

Veletsianos, G. (2016). The defining characteristics of emerging technologies and emerging practices in digital education. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.) Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120258

Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice [Kindle version]. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/

Wheeler, S. (2012). Theories for the digital age: Connectivism [Blog Post]. Retrieved from http://www.steve-wheeler.co.uk/2012/10/theories-for-digital-age-connectivism.html.

Worrell, F. (1965). Teachers as scholars. Science, 147 (3656), 358-358.

Bookmark and Share
90 Comments
  1. Digital innovation in education is very useful, I like everything that can ease the educational process. Now many students suffer from plenty of writing assignments, and I`d glad if there were less such assignments. Now I`m using writing help, and I found an interesting site https://www.writingjudge.com/ with reviews on writing companies for students. Thanks to this site, I picked a reliable service for my home assignments.

  2. We would be better taught what is really important, for example, that women’s rights are still not protected, that inequality is manifested in little things, but it is still visible. I have felt it all my life, and especially while studying at university.

  3. To be honest, I can’t disagree, now this issue is becoming especially topical, although some people want to replace certain concepts on it often. But it is necessary to prevent it and purposefully defend your position. This is what I am doing now, so by the way, those to whom it is close to read about such “trifles” https://studydriver.com/trifles-essay/ , there is quite enough symbolism here, you can look at these essays just on this topic and I have already learned a lot for myself, and I am going to write about the problem raised in my research work. I hope that I will be able to reach out to someone who makes decisions.

  4. Great job. I believe that the scholarship is a well-deserved payment for the student’s work. This is an additional motivation not only to study well for a brighter future but also to receive financial rewards for their work. I was never a perfect student, and I often spent my leisure time as I wanted, instead of preparing assignments. Thanks to this service https://www.rush-my-essay.com/ I always prepared my task on time. And I got my diploma without any problems.

  5. It is an extraordinary spot to begin on the off chance that you are keen on advanced humanities. Basically, grant in computerized humanities centers around using innovation to tackle issues in the humanities without diving into what might be known as technical disciplines or PC sciences. Plus, you can ask https://stanfordonlineclasses.com/ to make it easier for you by asking them to take my online class for me.

  6. A smart student always looks for smarter ways to get good grades as they are going to decide their future. However, before trusting any second part for dissertation assignment help, to enhance your academic performance in the university, you may need to do well research. While finding someone for the dissertation help, keep a few things in your mind. First, you must ensure that what you exactly want from this service, as you are sure that your writing helper can deliver you with the same. Afterward, make sure that all the dissertation help they are providing is well-researched, analyzed, compared, and written with perfection.

  7. Cloud thinking always provides with extremely informative and educational blogs, such as this essay on digital scholarship. It briefly explains all the points and conveys the message loud and clear. With references and formatting, it reminds me of an essay I got done from online UK best essays which also followed the same perfection and conciseness, the quality is the best.

  8. This information about integration and research can be very useful in my sociology thesis because the information on this page has a philosophical emphasis on it but I do not know how to contemplate this information on paper. The researching part is done, I just need to deliver all the data I have gathered and buy custom assignment online services to form my thesis in an articulate manner upon the data I have collected.

  9. Can anyone help me do my assignment? I think this is one question we hear all the time from helpless students who are unable to do their assignment because they lack conceptual understanding or they simply do not have the time to do it because of preoccupations. That is why we offer the help they need in Assignment Writing Company.

  10. Thanks for sharing such a beautiful information. Scholarship is very helpful for a student to complete his study and fulfill his/her dreams. Give a look at Dubai, thousands of villas for rent there and best place to set up your business.
    rent villas in Umm Suqeim

  11. Up until now, all I have read on this article is extremely boring, and seems to be written by writers that lack education. You’ve done a very good job conveying your passion with accurate information. 바카라사이트

  12. Do you want to focus on referencing the assignments in a good way? If yes, then you are at right way. uaeassignmentshelp.com is leading to the best assignment writing service in UAE .We have a great team of online assignment writer UAE who are available for 24×7 hrs and deliver it on time. Buy now

  13. Nowadays, students are attending regular lectures and prepare numerous projects. These projects make the aspirants overburdened by decreasing the scope of the candidates in sitting with ease. Thus, we have come with amazing quality online homework help solutions for distressing the aspirants by taking their burden on our head. So, you don’t have to think about it. Our Homework Help experts regularly engaged with experimenting activities for offering high-quality homework help services to you. our professional’s homework help writers will there for you 24/7 and give you a fruitful solution to all your homework related needs. Let our expert handle all your home queries.

  14. Nice post. I used to be checking constantly this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info particularly the ultimate section 🙂 I take care of such information a lot. I was seeking this certain information for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.
    The alchemist pdf

  15. Great illustrated information. I thank you for that. No doubt it will be very helpful for my future projects. I want to see some other articles on the same topic!
    usa map

  16. Acadecraft is one of the leading Sat test preparation service providers among several companies. With a team of more than four hundred and fifty employees, the company ensures to deliver the best test preparation services. We are a team of the best subject matter experts, developers, and cquality analysts.

  17. There are some interesting points in time in this article however
    I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There’s some validity but
    I will take maintain opinion till I look into it further.
    If you want to know about Harvard Outline, We are having a team of experienced writers who can help you out.
    Harvard Outline

  18. College assignments are endless. If you are tired of writing assignments day and night and need some free time, you can come to Best Assignment Experts and talk to our experts. Hire a suitable college assignment helper and get your college assignment done within the deadline. Our contents are extremely original and unique and plagiarism free.

  19. Oxymembrane is a one-stop-shop for sewage treatment design, building, and installations. The company also continuously supplies spare parts and consumable.

  20. This article is loaded with some well-informed data. You have made admirable statements in an exceptional manner about errors. Since this has made me wonder about more things I would want to know about unisa application

  21. MyAssignmentHelpNow, who help students globally at all academic level. We work 24*7 so that you don’t need to wait for any certain time, you can reach us any time. For our online assignment help you can directly get into touch with our expert.

  22. When it comes to professional assignment help online many students become skeptical. Many face doubts about whether or not they should try such services. If you are one of such students, we are here to eradicate all doubts by letting you know some of the pros. One of the best thing that you will get by hiring a genuine team is a well-structured assignment before your deadline. Secondly, you can get to learn a lot of new things with expert guidance. Other than this, you do not have to pay a huge sum of money because today we have an array of affordable online assignment help options.

  23. Western men want to feel https://topforeignbrides.com/ respected and loved, and foreign women looking for American men do it better than anyone else. This is why so many Western bachelors are searching through platforms for these amazing girls. They stick with their partner through the good times and the bad. They do not believe in divorce like they do in Western countries. So an American man can feel secure and can rely on his mail order wife.

  24. Are you clueless about how to write an evaluative essay? If you are looking for top-quality help online, there’s no better place than Best Assignment Experts. Our Evaluative Essay writers have in-depth knowledge in this field and are equally experienced. So come to Best Assignment Experts and give our expert writers a chance to serve you.

  25. Best assignment expert is now available to assist students in Canada with all their Assignment Helper Canada we’ve got a branch of professional PhD. and experts who are available 24/7 and always ensure on-time submission of assignments at an awfully cheap and reasonable rate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *