Part 2: Critical Reflection

The learning, inspiration and motivation that comes with each subject I undertake encourages reflection and analysis of my own practices to promote personal growth to be the best teacher librarian I can be. This, coupled with fears of inadequacy forced upon by at times feeling overwhelmed by what the role entails, makes me question how can I possibly do it all?  With this in mind, I reflect on the words of wisdom shared in a previous subject. Rather than trying to do everything at once, choose one project to work on (Godfree & Korodaj, 2021). It is with this advice that I feel empowered to approach things more confidently and to establish a dynamic information environment within my school.

In today’s society people interact and utilise technology on a daily basis for entertainment, socialisation and learning experiences (Abeer et al., 2018). As society changes so too must libraries to ensure they are relevant, current and accessible for all its users. In a fast paced, ever changing society, particularly with what has occurred in recent times, 24/7 access to information is expected and utilised. Technology can provide the access and sharing of information. However, accessibility is only one element. As educators, we must ensure that we support and equip students with the essential skills to navigate, use and evaluate information effectively (information literacy) in a 21st Century that delivers a complex information landscape. To successfully engage in this environment the teaching of digital literacy skills is just as important (Combes, 2016).

Whilst creating this research guide my very own information literacies skills were put to the test and the emotions I experienced were reflective of those outlined as one moves through the Information Search Process. Searching, selecting and evaluating sources, referred to as the research ‘dig’ (Little, 2016) as well as inquiring about the technical side of creating a research guide were employed. Throughout a student’s educational journey they are constantly required to inquire and use information. I have come to the realisation that a whole school approach to inquiry learning and the development of information literacy skills is required. One way this can be achieved is through the creation of learning objects that can be reviewed and refined and utilised across all curriculum areas providing students with consistency and familiarity. A research guide needs to provide scaffolding, processes as well as resources to give direction and to support learners of all capabilities (Lee & Lowe, 2018). Strategically selecting a variety of resources as well as avoiding information overload, along with a carefully planned design which adheres to the Content Accessibility Guidelines all need to be considered when curating (Oddone, 2020 & Mann, 2010).

Teacher librarians play a crucial role in the development of such guides. However, as mentioned in the discussion forum collaboration and evaluation is an essential component to guarantee guides meet the needs of the users and remain dynamic (O’Keefe, 2021). Reflecting on what I have learnt throughout this subject, I realise that I  have been collecting, gathering resources that ‘could’ be used, rather that curating – strategic selection and giving purpose to each resource. Is this because I don’t trust my own evaluation and judgement? I am eager to continue to explore this avenue of curating by using technology and integrating Web 2.0 tools to support and enhance student learning.

References

Abeer, A., Alamri & Bader, A. & Alsaleh. (2018). Transforming education in the gulf region: Emerging learning technologies and innovative pedagogy for the 21st century. The American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 74-77.

Combes, B. (2016). Digital literacy: A new flavour of literacy or something different? Synergy, 14(1). https://slav.vic.edu.au/index.php/Synergy/article/view/v14120163/2

Godfree, H. & Korodaj, L. (2021, April, 19). Lake tuggeranong college library [Recorded presentation]. ETL507, Interact2. https://charlessturt.zoom.us/rec/play/zB7ISAg_QjYDtxlCXWgZGXvoWws3aEg5EuHlKw7MD10m6r6mpnKdTDmYM9WEtbNuwg5klGZwf26JJuGJ.w6UWlu9TNNM5dppp?continueMode=true

Lee, Y. Y. & Lowe, M. S. (2018). Building positive learning experiences through pedagogical research guide design. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(4), 205-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1499453

Little, H.B. (2016, September 7). Curation and pathfinders. Knowledge Quest. https://knowledgequest.aasl.org/curation-and-pathfinders/

Mann, A. C. (2010). How to make a good library pathfinder. Amy C Mann. https://amycmann.wordpress.com/practical-experience/continuing-staff-development/make-a-pathfinder/

Oddone, K. (2020, April 3). Digital content curation: How to do it right! SCIS. https://scis.edublogs.org/2020/04/03/digital-content-curation-how-to-do-it-right/?sbe-followsubs=true

O’Keefe, A. (2021). One of the many hats. [Forum Post]. ETL501, Interact2. https://interact2.csu.edu.au/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&course_id=_57506_1&nav=discussion_board_entry&conf_id=_114042_1&f

Evaluating Website Criteria for Teacher Librarians

EducationalReliabilityTechnical
Does it meet needs, interest level and the purpose of the intended audience?Authority – Who is the Author? Is this clearly visible? What qualification do they hold? Are contact details provided?Does the page take a long time to load?
Is the reading level suitable for the intended audience?What is the purpose of the site? Is it set to inform, sell or persuade the viewer? Does it contain bias?Do the graphics add information?
Does it offer a range of reading levels for the intended audience?Accuracy – Is the content up to date? Is the creation or last updated or reviewed date visible? Is spelling, grammar and punctuation used correctly?Is it visually appealing, easy to read and navigate?
Is the cognitive level suitable for the intended audience and does it offer differentiation?Is there a bibliography? Are there links to other sources that are also reliable?Do all the links work? Are they clearly visible, annotated and explained? Can the links be easily navigated?
Does this website contain enough information when combined with other websites that is fair and challenges differing view points?Does the site offer accessibility tools for the users needs?

When it comes to website evaluation, I have never really considered all three perspectives of educational, reliability and technical criteria. When finding sources to be used for particular purposes, what I am familiar with is the educational and reliability criteria. First and foremost one questions does the website suit the intended purpose, meet the users needs and interest level. Having used CRAP tests with students before and using the language ‘Is this website reliable?’ has seen me heavily basing my evaluation on the reliability element. After reading through the various examples of website evaluation, the technical criteria plays an important role as well. Depending on a your purpose this may seem like the least important element, however, in a school setting some elements are equally important (Herring, 2011). Navigating and deciphering an already complex information landscape is hard enough without adding unnecessary difficulties of overcrowded content and layout and accessibility issues. Therefore, based on the readings, the necessary criteria for teacher librarians to consider when evaluating a website has been compiled in the table above.

Herring, J.E. (2011). Web site evaluation: A key role for the school librarian. School Librarian, 27(8), 22-23. https://maureensresources.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/websiteevaluationlibrarian.pdf

What’s in a name?

Library of AlexandriaSchool Library
to store scrolls and as a repository for knowledgeis responsible for the management of resources within the school both physical and electronic.
where academics, ordinary citizens and scholars could meet, listen and discuss matters of notein some cases, is the hub of the school. It is a multipurpose space that often is used by all members of the community. Staff meetings as well as teacher/student, student/student collaboration occurs within this space
where scholars and people could petition the librarian to find informationoffers access to a wide range of information sources as well as teaching the correct and ethical use of such information.
where the publishing of information and creative works occurred.allows individuals, small groups, whole classes, whole staff and parent bodies to create. Anything from private thoughts to the development whole school plans are created in the space depending on the purpose of its users at the time.

Module 1 – Bloom’s Taxonomy

ObjectiveQuestionResources/Web 2.0 tool
Knowledge What is an ecosystem?Dictionary - print or online or basic textbook, eg. Wordnik, Visuword, ...
ComprehensionList the different parts of the ecosystem and explain what they do.Use Kiddle to search for information about ecosystems. Take notes, list and explain using OneNote
ApplicationUsing a diagram, show how the water cycle operates in an ecosystem.Use Sketchpad to draw a diagram
AnalysisContrast the natural water cycle with that used by our community.Popplet can be used to visually display the contrast between the two and furthermore see similarities and differences
SynthesisIdentify an unspoilt ecosystem and design a way of preserving it.Use Flickr to find an image of an unspoilt ecosystems. Explain Everything can then be used to annotate the image to suggest best ways of preservation for particular areas
EvaluationIs it reasonable that people pollute our waterways? Defend your answer.Create a poll using Menti to gather information/evidence. present information along with own views. Or take photos of local waterways and create a poster defending your stance to the question using PicCollage or Canva