After reading Grigg (2012), there are a range of models and methods for collection evaluation that are relevant in my school context of a small regional primary school with mainstream and support classrooms. As a small library with only a teacher librarian there are often some practicalities issues when it comes to collection evaluation. Often any collection evaluation will occur through surveys and data analysis and during formal stock takes. When considering the need for and benefits of collection evaluation comparted to the difficulties it can depend on the situation. As an older school we have a large number of resources that are not always relevant or valued anymore but are also a school with a limited library budget and limited access to technology so collection evaluations can be a great way to start conversations about effective resources and budget issues. I think practically when considering collection evaluation it is important to get the right outcomes in the simplest way possible. As a small primary school library our collections do not have tp be particular in-depth or cover a considerable range of topics so simple evaluations that lead to a better understanding  of what collection adjustments need to be made is most important. Considering the areas with the most priority in collection evaluation I would be leaning towards a non-fiction collection evaluation so that the non-0fiction collection is more relevant and appropriate for the students and staff needing access to it to support classroom learning.