Browsed by
Tag: ETL401

Photo by Nadeena Granville on Unsplash
Time Management and Negotiation

Time Management and Negotiation

Comments 0 Comment

In my professional and personal life, I have always been excellent at time management and prioritising what needs to be done. Being in a demanding profession such as teaching has honed my time management skills even further. On the other hand, negotiation is an area that I need to further develop if I want to become an effective teacher librarian.

 

When I think about teachers who I have worked with in the past that possessed influential qualities, my mind goes one executive teacher. Their influence and impact in my formative years of teaching was so great that I continue to this day to think that is the teacher that I want to be. She was not only influential to her team, but also the students with whom she connected with. When my teaching team watched this executive teacher model quality teaching practices to us, we would always note how mesmerised the students (and us) were when she taught. Her calm demeanour made it easy to approach her whenever you needed support. She was also able to see potential within me that I could not see in myself and always encouraged me to develop my pedagogy across different areas of teaching.

 

When identifying the advanced skills in time management and negotiation that this executive teacher possessed, one major concept influenced both areas: the students. Being in an executive role is demanding, but it was clear that this executive teacher managed their time by prioritising anything related to student learning. When it came to negotiating with her team or with other executive staff, she remained solutions focused and was always equipped with reasons and evidence to back up what she was trying to negotiate for. If others put up defences, she would respectfully question their reasons and draw everything back to how it would impact student learning.

 

I believe I can achieve more productivity as a teacher librarian by utilising digital tools and becoming more fluent with them. I touched on this briefly in a previous blog post entitled Using Digital Tools to Collect Evidence, where I discussed how digital tools can help a teacher librarian work more efficiently as once established, many applications can run automatically. Using online calendars to manage my time, particularly when it comes to the collaboration aspect of teacher librarianship, will enable me to clearly envision what is ahead of me and help me to prioritise tasks.

 

I need to build up my confidence in the art of negotiation. I believe confidence and experience play a factor in the development of negotiation skills. Thinking back to that influential executive teacher, I need to remember that everything I negotiate for has a direct impact on student learning. If I can keep this in the forefront of my mind and provide evidence to back up my case, slowly but surely, I should be able to build my negotiation skills.

Photo by Vlad Bagacian on Unsplash
ETL401: A Reflection On Learning

ETL401: A Reflection On Learning

Comments 1 comment

When I reflect upon how far my learning has come since the beginning of this subject, I have come to realise that the preconceived ideas that I had were from a different era of teacher librarianship (Wilson, 2021, March 8). In recent times the profession has undergone a renaissance, reinventing itself to meet the need for students to be information literate in the 21st century. Through regular blogging and online discussions, I can see just how far my understanding of information literacy, inquiry learning models and the teacher librarian’s role in inquiry learning has come.

 

My initial understanding of information literacy was simply the action of selecting, locating and evaluating resources. My new understanding acknowledges that information literacy is complex, broad and context dependent. With the information landscape continuing to evolve at a rapid rate, the definition of information literacy will evolve with it and in turn, change the skills and knowledge required of me as a teacher librarian (Wilson, 2021, May 5). To begin constructing my own understanding, I applied Annemaree Lloyd’s (2007, p. 5) sociocultural definition of information literacy to the context of student learning and identified that the development of transliteracy skills, student collaboration, engaging students using all their senses, and incorporating ICT were crucial in the teaching of information literacy (Wilson, 2021, April 26).

 

With my increased understanding of information literacy comes a greater understanding of the Australian Curriculum’s (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, n.d.) general capabilities and their place within teaching and learning. In module 4.1a and 4.1b, I reflected upon my personal experience as a classroom teacher trying to reconcile best practice with other competing demands (Wilson, 2021, April 16; Wilson, 2021, April 17). I resonated with what Lee FitzGerald (2018, p. 53) cited as an inhibitor for collaboration: “embarrassment”. I was embarrassed for not understanding how to incorporate the general capabilities within my teaching. Having now had practice in embedding the general capabilities within an inquiry unit and identifying how to assess these skills, I now feel more capable in incorporating these skills and processes into future guided inquiry units.

 

Through my learning of information literacy models I came to the conclusion that any challenges or disadvantages bought about by the implementation of a guided inquiry approach were outweighed by the advantages; the most notable being that “a guided inquiry approach to learning allows our students to construct their own meaning and subsequently create lifelong learning skills” (Wilson, 2021, May 1). Of the many information literacy models I analysed, the one that piqued my interests was Guided Inquiry Design (Kuhlthau et al, 2015, p. 53). As a lower primary teacher, I always believed that research tasks were reserved for older students. However, Guided Inquiry Design has shown me that by scaffolding their emerging research skills and harnessing their natural curiosity (Maniotes, 2018, p. 19), even the youngest of students can develop inquiry skills. Utilising digital tools allows teachers to collect qualitative data on the inquiry process (Wilson, 2021, April 14) and support younger students to record reflections on their learning orally, mitigating the need for well-developed writing skills.

 

I have come to learn that the role of a teacher librarian is teacher first, librarian second. This concept was reinforced when I examined the standards within the Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage (Australian School Library Association, 2014) (Wilson, 2021, April 19). I previously held the misconception that teacher librarians simply connected classroom teachers to relevant resources when planning units of inquiry. I now recognise that collaboration is the key to embedding information literacy and sits at the core of a teacher librarian’s role. However, creating a culture where collaboration is valued amongst classroom teachers is no easy feat, requiring a teacher librarian to think long-term and begin with “one interested teacher at a time” (Garrison & FitzGerald, 2019) (Wilson, 2021, April 23).

 

In module 4.3, I examined research that provided evidence of the impact a teacher librarian has on student reading results (Hughes, 2013, para. 1) and expressed the opinion:

If the mere presence of a teacher librarian (sometimes not even qualified with dual qualifications) in a school has the impact to improve reading results, then I imagine the active involvement from a dually-qualified teacher librarian in curriculum development would have an even greater impact on student learning and achievement across many other learning areas (Wilson, 2021, April 24).

Therefore, by expanding my own understanding of information literacy and inquiry learning through ETL401 and putting this new learning into action, I should be able to make a significant pedagogical impact on the teaching and learning within my school.

 

References

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d.). General capabilities. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/

 

Australian School Library Association. (2014). Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage. ASLA. https://asla.org.au/evidence-guides-tls

 

FitzGerald, L. (2018). Guided inquiry goes global : Evidence-based practice in action. ABC-CLIO, LLC

 

Garrison, K. L. & FitzGerald, L. (2019, October 21-25). “One interested teacher at a time”: Australian Teacher Librarian Perspectives on Collaboration and Inquiry [conference paper]. 48th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship and the 23rd International Forum on Research in School Librarianship, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

 

Hughes, H. (2013).  School libraries and teacher-librarians: evidence of their contribution to student literacy and learning. Curriculum and Leadership Journal, 11(12). http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/school_libraries_and_tls,36453.html?issueID=12777

 

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.

 

Lloyd, A. (2007). Learning to put out the red stuff: Becoming information literate through discursive practice. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 181-198.

 

Maniotes, L. K. (2018). Guided Inquiry Design in Action: Elementary School. Libraries Unlimited.

kelly-sikkema-tQPgM1k6EbQ-unsplash
The Redefinition of Literacy Skills and its Effects on Teaching

The Redefinition of Literacy Skills and its Effects on Teaching

Comments 0 Comment

The information landscape has evolved at a rapid pace over the last few decades. I am a part of a generation; Gen Y, otherwise known as the Millennials; that has grown up within this rapidly changing environment. In the little country primary school that I attended, we had 1 computer in the library that was connected to dial-up internet that was so painfully slow. In high school, the internet was becoming common-place for socialising, with all my friends and I chatting after school on our PCs using MSN Messenger. In year 10 I got my first mobile phone, thanks to my best friend winning us both a Nokia 3315 in a radio competition. The way I consumed music was also defined by my schooling years: in primary school I had a cassette Walkman, in highschool: a Discman, and in College: an mp3 player. This evolution of the information landscape has continued at a fast pace well into my adulthood. Here I am in the present day completing a Master’s degree online, having access to everything I need to succeed at my fingertips thanks to technological advancements.

 

A school cannot stand-still in time while all this rapid change is happening around it. It needs to evolve with the ever-changing information landscape that the students it services live in, play in and learn in. As I have come to learn through ETL401, the term “literacy” itself is broad in its definition and changes depending on the context. With each new piece of technology that is introduced comes new literacies. The reasons why our methods for teaching literacy need to evolve with it are two-fold. The first is that our students will not hesitate to adopt these new technologies within their lives outside of the school (O’Connell, 2012, p. 4), so schools need to also adopt these same technologies in order to be authentic places of learning. The second is that the critical thinking skills needed to critically engage with these technologies requires explicit teaching.

 

The introduction of eBooks are a prime example of why we need to adjust our methods of teaching literacy. When we use electronic devices, information is being provided to us at a rapid rate. To cope with this influx we train our brain to use skills such as skimming and looking for key words. Our attention is also pulled multiple directions at once as we have multiple tabs open or notifications from different applications popping up, interrupting our train of thought. When use these same devices to read an eBook, our brain instinctively applies these same skills which subsequently results in a shallower understanding of the text being read (Barron, 2017, p. 18). Maryanne Wolf (2018, para. 12) proposes that we need overcome this difference in multimodal reading methods by helping our students to develop a “bi-literate reading brain capable of the deepest forms of thought in either digital or traditional mediums”. This ultimately means teachers will need to change the way in which they currently teach reading skills; accommodating for this new modality of text that students will be accessing more and more frequently in the future.

 

eBooks are just one of many examples of technology changing our methods of teaching literacy. It is the job of the teacher librarian to keep abreast of any changes within the information environment and instigate changes to the teaching of literacy within the school when the need arises.

 

References:

Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15-20.

 

O’Connell, J. (2012). Learning without frontiers: School libraries and meta-literacy in action. Access, 26(1), 4-7.

 

Wolf, M. (2018, August 25). Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/25/skim-reading-new-normal-maryanne-wolf

sigmund-TJxotQTUr8o-unsplash
The Advantages, Challenges and Disadvantages of Implementing a Guided Inquiry Approach

The Advantages, Challenges and Disadvantages of Implementing a Guided Inquiry Approach

Comments 2 comments

The implementation of any new learning program within a school brings with it advantages, challenges and disadvantages. Through pre-identification, teacher librarians can gain a wholistic view of the guided inquiry framework they wish to implement. They will be able to use points of advantage to advocate for its implementation and develop an understanding amongst staff of its potential impact on student learning. Pre-identifying challenges and disadvantages allows the teacher librarian to predict possible hurdles and subsequently plan to mitigate their impact on the implementation process. Below are just some of the advantages, challenges and disadvantages that I have identified through literature so far.

 

Advantages

A guided inquiry approach to learning offers students an authentic learning framework through which they develop and utilise skills that are applicable to their lives outside of schooling. Carol Kuhlthau, Leslie Maniotes and Ann Caspari (n.d., para. 27) describe their Guided Inquiry Design framework as:

“a way to learn that prepares them for living and working in the information age. … [it] creates an environment that motivates them to want to learn. It engages them in determining importance and meaning by connecting the curriculum with their world for deep lasting learning. The Guided Inquiry Design framework is an innovative, dynamic approach to teaching and learning for providing information age education for children”.

It is clear from this quote that implementing a guided inquiry approach within a school has far-reaching benefits to the lives of the students that we teach. It is through this framework that students can develop 21st century skills, such as those stipulated within the General Capabilities of the Australian Curriculum. A guided inquiry framework combined with the teaching of the General Capabilities equip students to be informed and active citizens beyond their schooling years.

 

Challenges

One of the first challenges a teacher librarian may come across in their mission to implement a guided inquiry approach is getting classroom teachers onboard with the concept and opening a channel of collaboration. I have discussed the challenges related to initiating collaboration and ways to circumnavigate this within my previous blog post, Slow and Steady Wins the (Collaborative) Race. However, this post did not address why teachers were hesitant to engage collaboratively with the teacher librarian to implement a guided inquiry approach. One possibility could be due to the “embarrassment” that can be felt by a classroom teacher when it comes to their limited knowledge of the inquiry process (FitzGerald, 2018, p. 53). This embarrassment can also be felt by the teacher librarian as they deal with the specialist content of a classroom teacher (FitzGerald, 2018, p. 53). This explains why many teachers default back to a traditional research assignment approach to teaching units of work (Kuhlthau, 2014, p.9). Linda Gibson-Langford (2009, p. 3) suggests using action research to develop true collaboration between teacher librarians and classroom teachers as it “deepens conversation and challenges both researchers and participants to question the way things are done and to take risks with new ideas”. In its essence, action research creates a new blank space in which the teacher librarian and classroom teacher can create new ideas and learning approaches together.

 

Stemming from the embarrassment that many teachers may feel in regard to their lack of knowledge around guided inquiry is the issue of workload and time constraints. A lack of time to learn about, plan and implement guided inquiry coupled with competing demands affects both the classroom teacher and the teacher librarian. The adage work smarter, not harder comes into play here. Research has shown that collaboration is the most effective way to overcome this (Garrison & FitzGerald, 2019, p. 7). Building interdisciplinary guided inquiry units is one way in which teacher librarians and classroom teachers can use time more effectively (Garrison & FitzGerald, 2019, p. 7). This breaking down of the knowledge silos within a school makes learning more authentic and gives students the opportunity to apply their understanding of the guided inquiry process to different contexts.

 

Disadvantages

There exists many inconsistencies and omissions within the Australian Curriculum when it comes to inquiry learning (Lupton, 2012, p. 15). This puts an unnecessary onus on the teacher librarian to fill in the gaps. This view may be seen as a “glass half-empty” one, but as I discussed before one of the hurdles towards teacher librarians successfully implementing a guided inquiry approach is a lack of time. If the inquiry components of the Australian Curriculum were more streamlined and coherent, then that would allow a teacher librarian to invest more time into the other aspects involved in implementing a guided inquiry approach. There is currently a review being conducted of the Australian Curriculum, with the aim of “refining, realigning and reducing the existing content of the curriculum” (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2020, para. 8). Hopefully, the inconsistencies that currently exists will be addressed, taking the pressure off the teacher librarian to fill in the gaps.

 

Implementing any new approach to learning is always going to be met with challenges and disadvantages but identifying them and researching ways to overcome these hurdles is the best approach that a teacher librarian can take. At the end of it all, the advantages of a guided inquiry approach outweigh any of the challenges or disadvantages it may bring. The biggest advantage is undeniable: a guided inquiry approach to learning allows our students to construct their own meaning and subsequently create lifelong learning skills.

 

References:

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2020). Review of the Australian Curriculum. https://acara.edu.au/curriculum/curriculum-review

 

FitzGerald, L. (2018). Guided inquiry goes global : Evidence-based practice in action. Libraries Unlimited.

 

Garrison, K. L. & FitzGerald, L. (2019, October 21-25). “One interested teacher at a time”: Australian Teacher Librarian Perspectives on Collaboration and Inquiry [conference paper]. 48th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship and the 23rd International Forum on Research in School Librarianship, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

 

Gibson-Langford, L. (2009). Collaboration or Co-blab-oration. Synergy, 7(2).

 

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K. & Caspari, A. K. (n.d.). Guided Inquiry Design. Rutgers. http://wp.comminfo.rutgers.edu/ckuhlthau/guided-inquiry-design/

 

Lupton, M. (2014). Inquiry skills in the Australian Curriculum v6: A bird’s eye view. Access, 28(4), 8-29.

 

Maniotes, L. K. & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8-17.

Photo by Compare Fibre on Unsplash
A Work in Progress: My Initial Understanding of Information Literacy

A Work in Progress: My Initial Understanding of Information Literacy

Comments 0 Comment

I am currently at the very beginning in regard to forming my understanding of information literacy, so the views that I write below are my preliminary understanding of things to consider when embedding information literacy as a teacher librarian. No doubt these views and understandings will evolve and change the more I learn, so it will be interesting to revisit this post in the future to see how far my understanding has developed.

 

Annemaree Lloyd’s (2007b) article, entitled Recasting information literacy as sociocultural practice: Implications for library and information science researchers, resonated with me the most. I was able to apply her observations around how NSW ambulance officers and firefighters became information literate within their professions to my own experience of becoming a primary school teacher; moving from the educational theory learned in university lecture theatres (epistemic information), to undertaking teaching practicums (corporeal information), then to my first job as a teacher (social information). Lloyd’s definition of information literacy is embedded in a sociocultural theory of learning. She describes information literacy as:

“a catalyst for learning and at the same time inextricably enmeshed with learning. Information literate people have a deep awareness, connection and fluency with the information environment. Information literate people are engaged, enabled, enriched and embodied by social, procedural and physical information that constitute an information environment. Information literacy is constituted through the connections that exist between people, artefacts, texts and bodily experiences, which enable individuals to develop both subjective and intersubjective positions. Information literacy is a way of knowing the many environments that constitute an individual being in the world” (Lloyd, 2007a, p. 5).

To structure my current understanding of information literacy and how it applies to the role of a teacher librarian, I am going reflect upon each sentence in Lloyd’s definition of information literacy above within the context of student learning in a school environment.

 

“Information literate people have a deep awareness, connection and fluency with the information environment” (Lloyd, 2007a, p. 5).

For a teacher librarian, this sentence highlights the need to develop the transliteracy skills of students. Transliteracy is the ability to fluidly move between technologies, media and contexts in order to search, collaborate and communicate effectively (Sukovic, 2016, para. 2). For example, the skills needed to select, locate, and evaluate information within a book are different to the skills needed to select, locate, and evaluate information within a website, and users need to know both in order to gain exposure to a richer information environment. A library that is comprised of a diverse range of information in different modalities is required so students can proficiently develop and use transliteracy skills. Some of the transliteracy skill set is reflected in the Australian Curriculum’s General Capabilities through the elements below:

 

“Information literate people are engaged, enabled, enriched and embodied by social, procedural and physical information that constitute an information environment” (Lloyd, 2007a, p. 5).

This point touches on Lloyd’s (2007b, para. 26) “knowing locations”: epistemic (print and electronic texts that contain theory and are representational of a concept), corporeal (formed through observation or a “tactile and kinaesthetic activity associated with actual practice” (Lloyd, 2007b, para. 29)) and social (knowledge gained from first-hand practice and experience). In a school context, I draw parallels with this idea to the Gradual Release of Responsibility model that is commonly used within teaching and learning. This model sees teachers scaffold learning by moving through a sequence of modelled (student observes a task or skill), shared (student performs this task or skill with a peer or teacher), and independent learning (student performs the task independently). This model is commonly implemented with the teacher-student relationship at the centre and ignores the beneficial impact that collaboration with peers can have during the modelled and shared stages (Fisher & Frey, 2008, p. 3). Proving students with opportunities to collaborate and learn from each other is reflected in the following elements from the Australian Curriculum’s General Capabilities:

 

“Information literacy is constituted through the connections that exist between people, artefacts, texts and bodily experiences, which enable individuals to develop both subjective and intersubjective positions” (Lloyd, 2007a, p. 5).

Lloyd (2007b, para. 11) highlights how we need to use our whole body, not just our minds, when becoming information literate. Providing opportunities for students to engage with content through the utilisation of different senses via various modalities will strengthen their learning and development of information literacy. Again, it highlights the important role collaboration and social interaction play in learning. As I reflect on this element of Lloyd’s definition, I recall the Visual, Auditory and Kinasthetic learning style theory that was popular around the time that I was studying my degree. As a theory, its impact on learning has been challenged, but at the crux of it exists an idea that most competent teachers understand already: “that children learn through their senses, that environment and motivation are important, and that the human brain is pretty well adapted to processing the information from everything that they see, hear and do” (Sharp et al., 2008, p. 294). Understanding that learning is complex and thus planning learning experiences that engage all three can provide a richer learning experience to create information literate students.

 

“Information literacy is a way of knowing the many environments that constitute an individual being in the world” (Lloyd, 2007a, p. 5).

The ‘environments’ are the different contexts that exist within a student’s life which requires them to learn a related information literacy. Some environments that students may be developing their information literacy include part-time jobs, sporting groups, and hobbies. Groups, such as hobby and interest groups, can exist face-to-face on through online communities. In the school environment, teacher librarians can harness the use of technology, such as wikis, skype and the Google suite of tools, to foster collaboration, “break down the knowledge silos”, and expand the learning environment (Gibson-Langford, 2009).

 

The considerations that I have identified through the analysis of Lloyd’s (2007a) definition of information literacy are: the development of transliteracy skills, collaboration between students, providing learning experiences that utilise the students whole body and senses, and utilising ICT as a means of collaboration and expansion of the learning environment. As I mentioned previously, I am still in the preliminary stages of developing my own understanding of information literacy. Lloyd’s (2007a) definition combined with practical examples of how this applies within the workplace provided a context for me to develop my understanding. From this I was able to make connections to how it would apply in a school context and the considerations a teacher librarian would need to make when planning to teach information literacy.

 

References:

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching : A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development

 

Langford, L (2009). Collaboration or Co-blab-oration. Synergy, 7(2).

 

Lloyd, A. (2007a). Learning to put out the red stuff: Becoming information literate through discursive practice. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 181-198.

 

Lloyd, A. (2007b).  Recasting information literacy as sociocultural practice: Implications for library and information science researchers. Information Research, 12(4). http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis34.html#Lloyd_2007

 

Sharp, J. G., Bowker, R., & Byrne, J. (2008) VAK or VAK‐uous? Towards the trivialisation of learning and the death of scholarship. Research Papers in Education, 23(3), 293-314.

 

Sukovic, S. (2016). What Exactly Is Transliteracy?. Elsevier SciTech Connect. http://scitechconnect.elsevier.com/what-exactly-is-transliteracy/

Photo by CoWomen on Unsplash
Slow And Steady Wins The (Collaborative) Race

Slow And Steady Wins The (Collaborative) Race

Comments 0 Comment

‘Collaboration’ has been a reoccurring topic weaved throughout the modules of ETL401, yet it appears to be a concept that many school communities still struggle with. Teacher librarians need to be prepared to be patient and persistent while also setting realistic goals when advocating for a collaborative approach to teaching within a school. Annette Lamb (2011, p. 30) points out that the process is not a quick fix, rather “it may take a number of years to develop the type of open, supportive atmosphere necessary for full collaboration”. A teacher librarian facing a culture that does not value collaboration can plant a seed of inspiration, then cultivate and use this to gain momentum.

 

When beginning to implement a collaborative culture within a school community, the key is to start small. Kasey L. Garrison and Lee FitzGerald (2019, p.1) encourage teacher librarians to engage their fellow teachers in collaboration “one interested teacher at a time”. Karen Bonanno (2011, 17:15) also shares this perspective, suggesting that teacher librarians should put their energy toward the people who want to work with them. By collaborating with one teacher who is keen and interested, a teacher librarian will be able to co-create a guided inquiry unit that showcases to others the deep and meaningful learning that can achieved through collaboration. Teacher librarians can then use this partnership as a springboard to inspire other classroom teachers into a collaborative partnership. Michael G. Fullan (1999, p. 35) cites the need for “urgency-agency-energy” for collaboration to comprehensively embed itself into the school culture. ‘Urgency’ (motivation to make something happen quickly) coupled with ‘agency’ (the ability to utilise a range of collaborative skills) create the ‘energy’ that is needed to change a school’s culture to one that endorses collaboration (Fullan, 1999, p.35). Starting off small and harnessing the enthusiasm for collaboration that already exists in some teachers is the perfect place to begin cultivating the “urgency-agency-energy” needed to create an overall culture shift towards collaboration.

 

Communication is another important element in the success of promoting collaboration. Making connections with everyone associated with the teaching and learning process and nurturing these relationships, be it face-to-face or digitally, can bring success to the library program (Lamb, 2011, p. 28). This could be something as simple as emailing “hints and tips” or interesting resources to relevant teachers (Korodaj, 2019, para. 25). Asking to be a part of team meetings can also help create connections to teachers who may be hesitant to collaborate. Once a collaborative partnership between a teacher librarian and a classroom teacher has been established, it is essential to the success of the teaching and learning that the high levels of communication remain constant from the outset to the conclusion of a unit to ensure that both remain on the same page (Garrison and FitzGerald, 2019, p. 7). Sharing collaboration success stories with your school community will also help in changing perceptions to one that values collaboration between the teacher librarian and teachers.

 

The most convincing point in any argument for collaboration within a school community is the research that clearly demonstrates its positive impact on student learning. Embedding the teaching of literacy, information literacy, and digital literacy into guided inquiry units through collaboration with classroom teachers makes learning richer. One such example exists at the Methodist Ladies’ College in Victoria, where credit of the evident growth of digital literacy skills was given to the collaboration that exists between teacher librarians and teachers (Moloney & Lucas, 2019, p. 17). As these skills are not isolated to the library alone, their inclusion into subject-specific guided inquiry units give students the opportunity to develop and use these skills in an authentic manner.

 

Another argument for collaboration is a teacher librarians’ ability to assist teachers in meeting the general capabilities within the Australian Curriculum (Korodaj, 2019, para. 11). In an era of education that is still outcomes-based and data-driven, it can be difficult for a classroom teacher to reconcile the pressure to churn through content with the acquisition of 21st century skills. Leaning on a teacher librarians’ expertise in this area can enable a teacher to merge these two, sometimes conflicting, paradigms.

 

Ultimately, collaboration is considered a 21st century skill that we expect our students to develop, so modelling for them what effective collaboration looks like is only going to increase their understanding. The evidence is clear that collaboration between the teacher librarian and teachers has a positive impact on student learning and results… and after all, isn’t that what we are all striving for?

 

References:

Bonanno, K. (2011). ASLA 2011. Karen Bonanno, Keynote speaker: A profession at the tipping point: Time to change the game plan. https://vimeo.com/31003940

 

Fullan , M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Routledge Falmer.

 

Garrison, K. L. & FitzGerald, L. (2019, October 21-25). “One interested teacher at a time”: Australian Teacher Librarian Perspectives on Collaboration and Inquiry [conference paper]. 48th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship and the 23rd International Forum on Research in School Librarianship, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

 

Korodaj, L. (2019, April 24). At the crossroads (or a crossover!): Introduction to Teacher Librarianship (ETL401) and Teacher Librarian as Leader (ETL504). Lori’s E-Musings.

https://lorikemusings.wordpress.com/2019/04/24/at-the-crossroads-or-a-crossover-introduction-to-teacher-librarianship-etl401-and-teacher-librarian-as-leader-etl504/

 

Lamb, A. (2011). Bursting with potential: Mixing a media specialist’s palette. TechTrends : Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 55(4), 27-36.

 

Moloney, S., Lucas, A. (2019). Teacher librarians co-designing learning for effective digital literacy programs. Access, 33(3), 4-21.

The ASLA Evidence Guide: Teacher first, librarian second

The ASLA Evidence Guide: Teacher first, librarian second

Comments 0 Comment

The Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage (Australian School Library Association, 2014) is a window through which I am able to gain a comprehensive understanding of what will be expected of me when I eventually step into the role of a teacher librarian. As discussed in my first blog post, I am commencing this degree with limited predetermined ideas of what the role should be. This has allowed me to look at the role through fresh eyes and form my ideas from the ground up. This has been particularly pertinent as literature has indicated that the role is constantly evolving to adapt to learning in the 21st century (Lamb, 2011, p. 27). The Evidence Guide gives me a clear indication of what will be expected of me when I eventually do step into the role of a teacher librarian.

 

From first glance, this document clearly articulates that the role is teacher first, librarian second. By building upon the standards outlined within the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2011), the Evidence Guide emphasises that teaching is at the core of the role. Through the elaborations made on the descriptors, the document outlines the pedagogy that a teacher librarian would need to demonstrate to be considered proficient within their role. One such example can be seen below within the focus area 2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area.  The elaboration on the descriptor states that: “Proficient teacher librarians use their knowledge of current content requirements and teaching strategies to plan and teach a wide range of topics” (Australian School Library Association, 2014, p. 6).

An extract from the Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage (Australian School Library Association, 2014).
An extract from the Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage (Australian School Library Association, 2014, p. 6).

This indicates to me that planning and teaching is not isolated to classroom teachers alone. The inclusion of the word ‘wide’ when describing the topic range suggests that the content a teacher librarian would be planning for will overlap slightly with the planning of a classroom teacher (through collaborative planning), and goes beyond that of literacy, digital literacy and information literacy skills. Mandy Lupton (2014) recognises the teacher librarian’s unique “birds-eye view” perspective and proposes that teacher librarians utilise this and become curriculum consultants within their school (Lupton, 2014, p. 23). Reading the Evidence Guide clearly reinforces that the role of a teacher librarian is one that is strongly embedded in pedagogical undertakings of the school.

 

I have reflected upon how I would use the Evidence Guide to inform my practice in a previous blog post. In this post I applied the perspective of a reflective practitioner; using concepts of ‘structure’, ‘challenge’ and ‘support’ to frame my analysis. Throughout my learning in this degree, I will continue to make connections to the Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage (2014) to further my understanding of the role of a teacher librarian.

 

References:

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. AITSL.  https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards

 

Australian School Library Association. (2014). Evidence Guide for Teacher Librarians in The Proficient Career Stage. ASLA. https://asla.org.au/evidence-guides-tls

 

Lamb, A. (2011). Bursting with potential: Mixing a media specialist’s palette. TechTrends : Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 55(4), 27-36. https://doi-org.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/10.1007/s11528-011-0509-3

 

Lupton, M. (2014). Inquiry skills in the Australian Curriculum v6: A bird’s-eye view. Access, 28(4), 8-29. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/78451/1/Lupton_ACCESS_Nov_2014_2pg.pdf

Photo by Marvin Meyer on Unsplash
Using digital tools to collect evidence

Using digital tools to collect evidence

Comments 0 Comment

As mentioned in a previous blog post, teacher librarians will become an endangered species if they do not make visible what is invisible; that is, the pedagogical impact of their role on the teaching and learning within a school. Collecting evidence gives a teacher librarian the ability to make the pedagogical impact of their role obvious. In the school context, evidence can then be used to accurately guide the direction of the school library (Bonanno, 2015, p. 17). On a professional level, it assists in identifying areas of personal strength and areas in which professional development goals can be created. Prior to reading Joyce Kasman Valenza’s article Evolving with Evidence: Leveraging New Tools For EBP (2015), I had only considered using digital technologies as a way of displaying and sharing the evidence, as opposed to an efficient way to collect data. Taking advantage of these digital tools can assist busy teacher librarians to work more efficiently, as once a tool is established it can run automatically, with some digital tools also having the ability to analyse data at the click of a button. Valenza’s article also highlights the effectiveness of using digital technologies to capture not only quantitative, but qualitative data. Asking questions, such as “what have you learned about finding information?”, can lead to a richer understanding of less tangible aspects, such as the skill level of students or the culture of the school library (Valenza, 2015, p. 38).

 

When it came to collecting evidence using digital technologies, the only concepts I had prior to reading this article were taking photos or taking screenshots of documents that contained data. As Valenza states, taking photos are still a worthwhile way to collect evidence (Valenza, 2015, p. 42), but if I can supplement this with a myriad of other digital techniques, it will make a portfolio of evidence much more robust. I was already aware of some of the digital tools Valenza described in the article and have utilised them within in my teaching practice, such as Survey Monkey and the Google Workspace suite of programs (Google Docs, Google Sheets, Google Forms). But overall, most of the digital tools listed were new to me. I have analysed a few below that I would see myself using in the library context in the future, and added a few more digital tools that I have used in the past that would provide other avenues for collecting evidence of my practice as a teacher librarian.

Padlet logo
Padlet logo: https://padlet.com/

From perusing the website, Padlet really stood out to me as a digital tool that I could use in a multitude of ways, both professionally and personally. Valenza suggests using it as an exit ticket system, where students reflect upon their learning at the conclusion of a lesson by answering a metacognitive question, which is a fantastic formative assessment strategy (Valenza, 2015, p. 39). There is also a great website that details 30 creative ways to use Padlet for teachers and students (Renard, 2017), which includes some library-specific strategies, such as using Padlet to create a book wishlist or a library suggestion box for students to request books that they would love to see included in the school’s collection.

Curriculet logo
Curriculet logo: https://www.curriculet.com/

My first essay for ETL401 analysed the different attributes of eBooks in comparison to print books, so reading about the digital tools that give teachers and students the ability to interact within eBooks piqued my interests. While researching my essay it was clear that there was a preference amongst current students for print books over eBooks, leading to implications for the teacher librarian to actively promote eBooks to ensure they do not become an invisible, unused resource. Using add-ons such as Curriculet would allow a teacher librarian to assess reading skills by designing prompts to questions through the reading of set texts. It is the perfect way to ensure eBooks are a well-used resource within the school library as well as being an efficient way to collect data on reading skills.

Thinglink logo
Thinglink logo: http://www.thinglink.com/

My instant reaction when I analysed thinglink was to use this digital tool as a way to enhance the photographs that I would have already been including in my portfolio of evidence. Thinklink allows the user to create hotspots within a picture. When a user clicks on the hotspot, it provides additional information on a particular aspect within the picture. The format of the hotspot can be text, video or audio. This would be a fantastic tool to demonstrate how each area of the school library is utilised in meeting the schools mission statement. It also allows me as a teacher librarian to demonstrate how I meet the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership’s (AITSL) Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (2011).

 

As a classroom teacher, I have come across other apps that I would consider useful for collecting data:

Kahoot! logo
Kahoot! logo: https://kahoot.com/

Kahoot allows a teacher to create personalised quizzes which students can access without an account from an iPad, phone or laptop. The questions and multiple choice answers are displayed on a central display screen (such as a SmartBoard) and students use their devices to answer. They get personal feedback instantly on their screens and group feedback on the main screen. I have used Kahoot quizzes as icebreaker activities at the beginning of a school year and for formative and summative assessment pieces within units of work.

Seesaw logo
Seesaw logo: https://web.seesaw.me/

SeeSaw allows students to take photos or videos and annotate their work. This app was created as a way to share work in the classroom with family, but I have also used it as a way to capture student learning for my own records. Valenza discussed how she gets the students to video her library so she is able to gain a glimpse of the library from their point of view (Valenza, 2015, p. 42). SeeSaw could be an alternative way collect this evidence from students.

 

Valenza’s article has opened me up to a myriad of different digital technologies that I had never considered using before. I am excited to explore these apps further, even for my own personal use. From the readings within this module it is clear that I need to ensure that as a teacher librarian, I am conscious in making my pedagogical impact in the school obvious through the constant collection of evidence, which can be made more efficient through the use of digital tools.

 

References:

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. AITSL.  https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards

 

Bonanno, K. (2015). A profession at the tipping point (revisited). Access, 29(1), 14-21.  http://kb.com.au/content/uploads/2015/03/profession-at-tipping-point2.pdf

 

Renard, L. (2017). 30 creative ways to use Padlet for teachers and students. BookWidgets. https://www.bookwidgets.com/blog/2017/08/30-creative-ways-to-use-padlet-for-teachers-and-students

 

Valenza , J. (2015). Evolving with evidence: Leveraging new tools for EBP. Knowledge Quest, 43( 3), 36-43.

A Self-Reflection on my Essay: eBooks vs. print books

A Self-Reflection on my Essay: eBooks vs. print books

Comments 0 Comment

I write this post with a mix of emotions running though me. I have just hit the ‘submit’ button for my first assignment in ETL401. It is the first essay that I have written in 9 years.

I’m thrilled that I have completed the essay.

I’m nervous about what the reader/marker will think.

I’m doubting myself, questioning if I actually covered the topic succinctly.

I’m proud that I achieved what a few weeks ago seemed like an absolutely daunting task.

My writing skills are still very rusty, but just from the process of composing this essay I feel like a little bit of grease has been added to my writing gears. After all, the only way to become a better writer is to just write!

 

Out of curiosity, I created a word cloud of my essay to see what key words stood out. Can you guess the topic of my essay from the scramble of words below?

A word cloud of my essay
A word cloud of my essay – can you guess the topic?

If you oh-so accurately guessed: an analysis of eBooks vs. printed books and how a teacher librarian finds a balance between these two modalities, then you are correct. 😉 Below are some of the key ideas that I found most intriguing in the battle between eBooks and print books:

  • The generation that are currently attending school have a predominant preference for print texts over eBooks, which is surprising given how adaptive to new technology they are perceived to be (Rutherford et al., 2018, p.321).
  • Studies have found that reading information in print leads to better comprehension compared to eBooks. When we use our digital devices in day-to-day life, we tend to skim and look for key words. When we use these same devices for reading eBooks, our brain instinctively applies the same skill of skimming when reading (Barron, 2017b, p. 18).
  • The customisable features of eBooks (such as font size, font type, background colours, read-aloud features) make them the perfect tool to break down barriers for students who have learning difficulties or disabilities (Baker, 2017, p. 8).

For a teacher librarian, it is their objective to find a balance between both eBooks and print books in order to cater for all students and develop the critical skills they need to be learners in the 21st century.

 

While researching this topic I could not help but reflect upon my own use of print and eBooks when it came to studying. I found it ironic that I was printing out eJournal articles on the topic of comprehension being better in print so that I, too, could better comprehend the research about this topic. I find it easier to understand what I am reading if I can hold, highlight, write notes in the borders and cross-reference with other printed copies.

 

Even though my preferred modality of text is print, I do have an appreciation for eBooks. eBooks give me the flexibility to study anywhere at any time. I am fortunate enough to currently be a stay-at-home mum to my one-year-old, and the only times that I can study are when she is sleeping. Unfortunately, libraries are not open at 10pm at night and I doubt they would let me peruse the library in my pyjamas. But with eBooks I can do just that! eBooks have given me the ability to further my education without being limited by my location or time constraints. And for that I am thankful and grateful.

 

References:

Baker, E. (2017). Where have all the ‘real’ books gone?. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 22(3), 8-9.

 

Baron, N. S. (2017b). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15-20.

 

Rutherford, L., Singleton, A., Derr, L. A., & Merga, M. K. (2018). Do digital devices enhance teenagers’ recreational reading engagement? Issues for library policy from a recent study in two Australian states. Public Library Quarterly, 37(3), 318-340.

Photo by Adam Winger on Unsplash
Are school librarians an endangered species?

Are school librarians an endangered species?

Comments 0 Comment

Teacher librarians will become an endangered species if they do not make visible what is invisible; that is, the pedagogical impact of their role on the teaching and learning within a school. Current changes within the learning landscape have created an opportunity for teacher librarians to evolve and position themselves as the information specialists that support their school community in the transition to an increasingly digitised curriculum. They are also well placed between the information and education disciplines to support the development of research and critical-thinking skills that learners require. Ultimately, teacher librarians need to advocate and promote their unique talents as information specialists in 21st century learning.

Step 1 of 2
Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.

Log in

Skip to toolbar