Archive of ‘INF541’ category

INF541 Reflection – Assessment 5 – Part B

Game based learning

As a Teacher-Librarian, the delivery of school library services, classroom pedagogy and the impact of technology on learners and learning, has been a key focus of my practice. To this end, INF541 Game based learning has been both relevant and professionally interesting.  In my first blog post for this subject, I wrote that I was interested in being immersed in game based learning:

  • for professional growth;
  • to explore the research on why educators believe it is necessary to incorporate games, game design and programming into contemporary education and investigate how they are going about doing this;
  • to spend time playing games;
  • in order to better understand and prepare students for work, study and life in modern society, by learning if and how games can build critical thinking, communication, collaboration and creativity; and
  • to mentor, resource and support colleagues to experiment with GBL in their own classrooms.

The course work for Game based learning has provided many opportunities in these areas and significantly broadened my thinking about future directions at our school.

Professional growth

Professional growth has certainly been an outcome of completing Game based learning.  The environments we were encouraged to participate in, the resources and readings provided and the assessment items all extended my knowledge and have begun to inform my practice as a teacher-librarian.  In particular, the reflective blogging and collaboration in Twitter have been a fruitful process for me.  I found this kept me on track with the work load of the coarse, encouraged me to think deeply about topics and connecting to the blogs of other students provided insights that have informed and resonated with my own practice.

Exploring the research

One of the opportunities afforded through the course was to read a wide range of literature throughout the modules. In particular, exploring this research highlighted that digital games have the potential to enhance learning, yet adding them to the curriculum in formal settings is no simple matter.  On this point, educators interested in games for learning need to consider the games available, classroom and game pedagogy, frameworks for adoption, teacher training, and implementation strategies. It is also essential to consider the need for sound pedagogical practice when using games to teach.  While some authors, such as Gee, believe that good games incorporate good learning and identifying the learning inherent in games is of prime importance (2005, p.34), an alternative view is that successful game based learning requires a lot more of a teacher than finding a good game.  A valuable point is that teachers seek the sweet spot between game design and educational process for the effective adoption of games for learning (Arnab et al., 2012, p.162).  Consequently, teachers interested in games for learning need to be aware that planning this type of learning is a challenging and demanding prospect. Taking these points into consideration will be enormously important for my leadership in school library services as I contemplate how to include games in our school library collection, propose the establishment of a gaming space in the school library and support classroom teachers to include game-based learning into their curriculum.

The course work for Games based learning has also informed my library practice.  As a teacher-librarian, information literacy is a primary focus of my work. I decided to focus my compendium chapter on researching why school libraries should be motivated to use and promote game based learning. This work has provided some very practical ways that our school library can move towards becoming a space and a service that offers opportunities into the participatory cultures of digital games.

Spend time playing games

INF541 challenged participants to develop a questing disposition and identify and evaluate a range of games and game environments through direct experience and immersion.  In an early blog post, I revealed that “my use of game-based learning and understanding of the potential of games for learning is quite limited.  Just as Griffith University professor of education Dr Catherine Beavis identified that schools still have a way to go before they can harness the full educational potential of video games (Jennings, 2012), so too do I”.  Further blog posts document the games I experimented with during my learning journey in this subject.  In the post titled Playing around, six of these games are discussed.  These were a mixture of games produced for educational and entertainment purposes.  Later, as part of the research for the compendium chapter, I became curious to play a game called Portal to explore the claims that it could build information seeking skills.  My experience is documented in the blog post titled A Gen X and Millennial conversation about Portal.

As the subject draws to a close, the challenges and opportunities afforded have been many and have already started to impact my working life. In particular, I believe these understandings need to be translated to practice so that digital games will improve the opportunities of the students we work with.  I have not only had the privilege to read about digital games for learning but have also experienced the possibilities of learning through games and look forward to extending this to students so they are better equipped to solve problems creatively in a future that will require it.


Arnab, S.,Berta, R., Earp, J., De Freitas, S., Popescu, M., Romero, M., Stanescu, I., & Usart, M. (2012). Framing the adoption of serious games in formal education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(2),159 – 171. Retrieved from

Gee, J. P. (2014). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Second Edition . [Electronic version]. New York: St Martin’s Press.

Jennings, J. (2014, November 30). Teachers re-evaluate value of video games. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from






A Gen X and Millennial conversation about Portal


During research on games and their ability to impact information literacy, I came across an article that discussed the potential of Portal by Valve to do just do that.  As part of the course work for #INF541 at CSU, I had also challenged myself to experiment with game play as I have little personal experience in these environments.  And so, I purchased the game.

After half an hour of trying to figure out what to do next, I finally entered the game world.

My reading had told me that the goal of the game was to move through portals into different rooms and that each movement represented a puzzle that I had to figure out through trial-and-error.  I had even come across a ‘cheat’ saying that the first solution involved moving a cube onto a button to open the Portal.  I thought “I’m going to nail this”.

After another half an hour, I finally figured out how to go forward, backwards and left to right but where was the cube? I just seemed to keep running into walls – was there even anything in this room?

My next move was to call my fifteen-year-old son to come and help me.  He was disgusted – “Mum, look around you?”

Ha? What? I can look around?

My son then proceeded to tell me that I just don’t have a 2D brain.


Next, he told me that the game is just about solving puzzles.  This is exactly what the literature had also stated so I spent another hour in the game and did eventually manage to find a cube and open a portal.  However, I am sad to say I never did solve another puzzle.  To be honest, I am still trying to understand how the game is a puzzle.  It is completely unlike any other puzzle I have ever completed.

Clearly, I have a long way to go ……

However, what the experience did reinforce is the idea that playing digital games does necessitate the following skills and dispositions:


problem solving

active discovery

intuitive knowledge






Digital games and literacy


In Australia, the contemporary digital landscape has impacted educational systems.  According to Carrington, students today are surrounded by ever-evolving digital technologies and practices (as cited in O’Connell, 2014, para.2).  Consequently, the curriculum must now be “built on a view of literacy that encompasses but extends beyond traditional print and oral forms to include digital [and] multimodal forms” of information (Beavis and Apperley, 2012, p.12).

Digital games are one form of media that have been introduced to classrooms as learning tools (Van Eck, 2006, p.16).  Because of this, Beavis, O’Mara, and McNeice suggest we need to investigate how digital games function as new forms of text and literacy (2012, p.4).  Unlike traditional literacy which is largely inactive, games require a combination of understanding text, images, and sound as well as physical activity.  To understand the literacy of digital games, Beavis and Apperley maintain that we need a model that considers games as both action and text (2012, p.13).  to this end, Galloway states that “while games’ meanings are negotiated and produced in the interaction between text and reader, as is the case with any text, it is important to understand how the are enacted and instantiated through action (as cited in Beavis and Apperley 2012, p.14).

In conclusion, digital games have expanded our definition of literacy to incorporate physical interactions.  It will be interesting to observe how other emerging technologies that integrate sensory and immersive experiences and augmented reality further alter future definitions of literacy.


Beavis, C., & Apperley, T. (2012). A model for games and literacy. In C. Beavis, J. O’mara, & L. McNeice (Ed.). Digital games: Literacy in action (12- 23.). Kent Town: Wakefield Press.

Beavis, C.,O’Mara, J., & McNeice, L. (2012). Literacy learning and computer games: A curriculum challenge for our times . In C. Beavis, J. O’Mara, & L. McNeice (Ed.). Digital Games: Literacy in action (3- 11.). Kent Town: Wakefield Press.

O’Connell, J. (2014). Concepts and Practices for a Digital Age: INF530 Module 1 [Electronic material]. Retrieved from

Van Eck, R.(2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who arerestless. Educause review, 41(2),16 – 30. Retrieved from


Playing Around


As a student of INF541, I have been encouraged to explore games in order to understand the dynamics, features, appeal and the educational value they may offer to modern curriculums and pedagogy.  Prior to undertaking this subject, I had very little experience with digital games and so have been purposefully playing around in order to expand my knowledge of these environments.  Here are a few I have tried out:


This game is downloaded as an App and requires the participant to set a self-identified challenge and then to invite others to compete to achieve the goals or join a pre-existing challenge.  This can be used for anything including changing a habit, a fitness challenge, setting study goals or saving money.  Categories of existing challenges that a participant can join include health, relationships, career, creativity, finances, lifestyle, spirituality and just for fun.  This game counts on the motivation of competing against others to reach the top of a leaderboard.  This is much like the current trend of wearing a fitness tracker such as a Fitbit.


Screen Shot 2016-05-03 at 9.11.37 PM

Quandary is an ethical decision-making game that sets a context where players lead a new human colony on a distant planet.  The establishment of the colony requires the player to make difficult decisions that do not have a clear right or wrong answer.  The developers of the game, claim that it develops skills such as “critical thinking, perspective-taking, and decision-making”.  This game is quite text heavy and although I quite enjoyed playing it, when I trialed it with a focus group of year eight students, they expressed mixed reactions to the game.


Freerice is a game that provides learning with social activism.  The game allows participants to choose a subject that interests them and then answer multiple-choice, content knowledge questions on that topic.  Subject include English, Humanities, Maths, Chemistry, Language Learning, Geography, and Sciences.  For each correct answer, the participant earns 20 grains of rice that will be donated to feed the hungry.  Freerice is a non-profit website that is owned by the United Nations World Food Program who claim that they have goals: “to provide free education and to help end world hunger by providing rice to hungry people for free”.  This game and the resultant food donation is made possible through sponsors who pay to advertise on the site.  In terms of fun, this game is really drill-and-practice quizzes and can become quite repetitive.  It receives a positive rating from Common Sense Media who rate media based on both age appropriateness and  learning potential.


Spent invites players to experience what it might be like to have to survive living on the poverty line.  Players are given $1000 to live on for one month.  The game throws a number of difficult challenges at the player and asks them to choose from two, often equally unappealing options, for example, Do you hope your sick daughter gets better on her own or risk your job by leaving early to take her to the doctor?  Developers aim to raise a player’s’ awareness of how quickly changes in employment, housing, medical costs and other expenses can have disastrous consequences.

Rocket League for Xbox

I was encouraged to play this game “just for fun” by my fifteen-year-old son.  Rocket League is a physics-based multiplayer-focused soccer game played by high-flying vehicles.  Sound ridiculous? It is – it is but also ridiculously fun!  As a novice gamer, I found it quite difficult to get the hang of steering and scoring goals but it was addictive and I couldn’t stop laughing (and maybe swearing a little) the whole time I was playing.  While the motivation to keep playing is a strength due to the design feature of challenge and mastery, I would have to use my imagine to see how this game would meet learning the goals of any traditional curriculums.

Screen Shot 2016-05-03 at 9.05.02 PM

Trivia Crack

Like Rocket League, I tried Trivia Crack just for fun.  When I was having a look at what games are popular, this one kept coming up in reviews.  It is really a basic trivia game modelled on Trivial Pursuit that allows a player to play against known and unknown opponents to obtain six characters.  Trivia Crack receives a positive rating from Common Sense Media who state that “answering trivia questions, on the whole, can be a fun way to test yourself and maybe learn something too, but when you make it competitive, it raises the stakes and makes it a lot more fun”.

Using games to develop socially inclusive classrooms

How might games be used to develop a more socially inclusive classroom using Gee’s viewpoint?

socially inclusive classroom pic

In the article Good video games and good learning, Gee suggests that “challenge” and “learning” are what makes video games motivating and entertaining (2005, p.34).  He also asserts that schools fail to engage many of the learning principles he identifies as characteristic of games (pp. 34 – 37).  Furthermore, Gee challenges the reader to consider how we might make learning in schools more game-like (p. 37) and by extension, more intellectually stimulating, progressive and socially inclusive.   In particular, Gee’s article identifies customization and cross-functional teams as two learning principles that might be used to develop a more socially inclusive classroom.

Customization, Gee states, occurs in video games when the player is able to choose from different difficulty levels in order to match their ability and individual problem solving style (2005, p. 35).  Paul Anderson supports the use of customised learning through game-based pedagogy, stating that this allows students to move at their own pace through a mastery system.  This, he would argue, is more socially inclusive than a traditional teacher centred classroom where the teacher decides the pace with mixed results for students, leaving some bored and others confused (2012, 3min.30sec.).  This argument for game-based learning would appeal to educators who embrace cognitive theories of learning because user-based flexibility allows players to adjust the learning to fit their cognitive needs over time (Turkay, Hoffman, Kinzer, Chantes and Vicari, 2014, p.7).  Gee’s viewpoint takes customization of curricula one step further stating that it should go beyond self-pacing and include “real intersections between the curriculum and the learner’s interests, desires, and styles” (2005, p.35).  Such customization to match students’ abilities and personality has been found to increase motivation and depth of engagement and improve learning (Turkay, 2014, p.10) and consequently results in more inclusive classrooms.

Games belonging to the massively multiplayer online (MMO) gaming genre require players to be part of cross-functional teams.  Within such teams, each player must have a specialist skill set that is different to the other members of the team.  Players must also understand that problem solving within these games requires the integration of the different skill sets of the other players in the team (Gee, 2012, 1min. 26sec.).  Such games might be viewed by Gee as socially inclusive because they value an individual’s skill and knowledge as well as encouraging a commitment to a common endeavour (2005, p.37).  Baumeister and Leary (as cited in King, Defabbro and Griffiths, 2009, p.106) support this viewpoint, stating that MMOs satisfy a fundamental human need to belong to social groups.  The potential for such games to develop a socially inclusive classroom can only be realised, however, if teachers are able to evaluate, select and implement games in classroom settings and Turkay et al argue that many fell ill-equipped to do so (2014, p.3). Consequently, although Gee asserts that modern schools must be more like modern workplaces who value the forms of affiliation encouraged in gaming environments (2005, p.37), he does not provide any research or advice on how teachers might integrate such games into their curriculum and pedagogy.

The evidence that games have potential to impact positively on learning is compelling (Beavis, Rowan, Dezuanni, McGillivray, O’Mara, Prstridge, Stieler-hunt, Thompson and Zagami, 2014, p.569).  From Gee’s viewpoint, one such potential is that games could be used to develop a more socially inclusive classroom because they incorporate the learning principals of customization and cross-functional teams.  Such potential will be reached when teachers feel equipped with the knowledge and practicalities of implementing game-based learning in the classroom.


Anderson. P. (2012, April 24). Classroom game design: Paul Anderson at TEDxBozeman. Retrieved from

Beavis, C.,Rowan, L., Dezuanni, R., McGillivray, C., O’Mara, J., Prestridge, S., Stieler-Hunt, C., … Zagami, J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about the possibilities and limitations of digital games in classrooms. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(6), 569-581.

Gee, P. (2005). Good video games and good learning. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 85(2), 33-37.

Gee, P. (2012, March 21). James Paul Gee on learning with video games. Retrieved from

King, D.,Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2010). Video game structural characteristics: A new psychological taxonoy. Int J Ment Health Addiction, 8, 90-106.

Turkay, S.,Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: Learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms . Computers in the schools, 31, 2-22.

Entry Level:  In Need of a Beginner’s Guide

Games = Life

As an opening activity in INF541, we have been asked to create a statement about our current knowledge and understanding of game-based learning. I would have say that I feel my use of game-based learning and understanding of the potential of games for learning is quite limited.  Just as Griffith University professor of education Dr Catherine Beavis identified that schools still have a way to go before they can harness the full educational potential of video games (Jennings, 2012), so too do I.

What is the context of your learning?

As a Teacher-Librarian and Curriculum Leader in a secondary school setting, I am looking forward to being immersed in Game-Based Learning (GBL):

  • for professional growth;
  • to explore the research on why educators believe it is necessary to incorporate games, game design and programming into contemporary education and investigate how they are going about doing this;
  • to spend time playing games;
  • in order to better understand and prepare students for work, study and life in modern society, by learning if and how games can build critical thinking, communication, collaboration and creativity; and
  • to mentor, resource and support colleagues to experiment with GBL in their own classrooms.

What are your personal aims in this subject?

My personal aims for participating in the subject INF541 – Game Based Learning are to investigate what games are currently being used for learning, to try out playing some of these games and to think about how I might use these games in my own classroom.  The hope is that I too will experience being a learner who is building capacity in critical thinking, communication, collaboration and creativity. Participation in GBL, will be an experience in the “new culture of learning” which is described by Thomas and Seely Brown (2011) as a necessity for understanding the skills, mindsets and dispositions required for academic and career success in today’s climate.

How do you see game-based learning fitting into your practice?

According to the Australian Library and Information Association (ASLA), the role of the teacher-librarian is three fold: curriculum leader; information specialist; and information services manager. It might be argued that undertaking a course in game-based learning fits into a teacher-librarian’s professional practice because it meets the following criteria where ASLA stipulate a teacher-librarian must:

  • raise staff awareness of the need for students to acquire information skills and of the importance of resource-based learning in developing these skills;
  • maintain literacy as a high priority, engaging students in reading, viewing and listening for understanding and enjoyment;
  • interpret information systems and technologies for students and teachers in the context of curriculum programs;
  • provide specialist assistance to students using the school information service facility for independent reading, viewing and listening. (Australian Library and Information Association, 2014).

What challenges are you hoping to meet for yourself?

Due to my very limited experience with gamed-based learning, INF541 is one subject that will take me out of my comfort zone, expand my knowledge of research into the efficacy of gaming in education and extend my pedagogical practice. In How games prepare you for life – Education: 21st Century, we are told that games will fail to impact on the lives of young people unless they can make the connection that lessons learned in games are applicable to life. Schools too, we are told, will only harness the potential of games for learning when teachers make the knowledge learned in games meaningful. (Extra Credits, 2014) It is a key goal that I will be on the path to becoming a teacher who enables these lessons by the conclusion of this semester.


Australian School Library Association. (2004, December). Standards of professional excellence for teacher librarians. Retrieved July 25, 2015, from

Extra Credits (Director). (2014, May 14). How games prepare you for life – Education: 21st Century [Video file]. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from

Jennings, J. (2014, November 30). Teachers re-evaluate value of video games. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from

Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace?