Creative thinking

#INF536 – Literature Critique Reflection

https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8516/8573966340_bc01dde535_z.jpg

Well, it has been almost a week since I have been able to get back to INF536 for more than a cursory scan (why is it that every time I commence study, the balance of my world tips and suddenly instead of juggling full-time work, study and a bit of life, it becomes a circus tightrope act, whilst juggling, blindfolded, metres above the ground without a safety net?) My major stressor at present is to find a new home and move, in the next three weeks…or yes, and ensure that there is suitable accommodation for my 70 year old mom.

That aside, after reviewing my Task #4, I find myself in much the same state of mind as many of my peers and colleagues…not satisfied with my efforts, but accepting that a pass is sufficient. This is so totally at odds with 1. my Type A personality; 2. how totally enamoured I am with the whole concept of design thinking and the role of design in, well, EVERYTHING! and 3. my absolute NEED to constantly improve EVERYTHING. *sigh*

So here I am, stepping into the chasm that is 21 Century learning, putting my work out there knowing that I could have done so much better and yet, it was the best that I could do at the time. Knowledge Networks & Digital Innovations has resulted in my viewing learning through new lenses. I ‘knew’ that this generation use social media for an incredible amount of learning, and thought I was pretty social media savvy ūüôā but had never really considered using it for LEARNING or for the opportunities that we don’t allow our students to access, in schools. My seniors, past and present, have been astounded by the fact that so many of my peers share their work…

  • online,
  • before it is marked,
  • beyond the class group,
  • and (Heather Baillie, this one is for you! and all the rest, who have already made the leap) are willing to tweet the link and then watch as it is viewed by thousands around the world.

This truly is a remarkable course and an even more remarkable tribe of 21st Century learners, especially when you consider that most of us were born before the internet (that one always raises a gasp from students).

So, despite my anxiety (my relatively recent pacemaker is kicking in with each heart-stopping moment in #INF536), I have decided that I too need to take the kinds of risks that I would love to see my students take. I will post my Critique (even though it doesn’t really meet ‘critique’ criteria) and share it with my peers and whomever else chooses to read it.

Knowledge Networks & Digital Innovations is helping me take risks I never even considered taking before.

#INF536 is opening my eyes to a world I hadn’t really ‘seen’ before.

I have always loved the ‘creative types’. You know the ones… the genius in the Philipines who uses coke bottles, water and Clorox to bring light into shanty towns; the Dutch guy who loves rats and Africa so much, that entire communities are now living free of landmines and tuberculosis; the advertising campaigns that raise social awareness and more. I thought these people were just creative, but now I know that they are designers, thinking outside the box to problem-solve, in ingenious ways.

We are all designers, if we just open our minds and our hearts. THIS is the type of citizen that each and every one of us (and our students) has the potential to be, no matter the scale of the problem. To this amazing tribe of peers in #INF536, you inspire me!

I am so excited to be learning about design thinking, as I commence a new journey, at a new school, in a new role. The 21st Century is truly a remarkable time to be alive, if we could only see the opportunities it offers and grab them with both hands.

And…LEAP

By Felipe Ascencio. 2012

By Felipe Ascencio. 2012

 

INF536 Blog Task #3 – Design brief – How might we?

Design brief

http://aizzz.com/wp-content/gallery/articles/design-brief.jpg

OBSERVATION & DISCOVERY: The entry into the Secondary library is through a large covered concrete area (and our students deserve inspiring spaces (Baudett cited in Elliott Burnes, 2005), and the doors are flanked by security gates and then opens into a large space broken into display areas, the circulation desk and the two teacher-librarians desks. The external area serves as a thoroughfare, social gathering place and bag drop. The internal space is the only way into and out of the library and is not used for anything other than pausing to watch the TV display or browsing the book displays.

Links to sketches, previous blog for background and photos of the spaces involved.

INF536 Blog3

CONSTRAINTS: 

Known unknowns:

  • Cost of enclosing the outer area may not be feasible for the next 1-2 years, given other building works currently under way and in the pipeline.

TENSIONS:

Known knowns:

  • The impending one-to-one program requires that students use their devices inside and the current library only has seating for around 100 boys (secondary numbers 1500)
  • ¬†The school does not provide a social space for games, cards etc
  • The large external and reasonably large internal spaces are not utilised to maximise seating numbers, and some staff are concerned about the increased supervision that will accompany increased student numbers.

CHALLENGE: To redesign the entry into the secondary library in order to:

  • better utilise the space to accommodate more boys and their devices
  • welcome in boys who otherwise would be unlikely to make use of the library space
  • provide a service that is unique within the school (a welcoming social space)
  • ensure that access to, and the library itself, is user-friendly

POINT OF VIEW: With the view that imagination makes empathy possible (Green, 1995, cited in Bland, Hughes & Willis, 2013) the aim is to see the space, positives and negatives, from the point of view of all users, including students, teachers, TLs, library officers and visitors, to create a sense of belonging, be user-friendly and practical.

So,¬†How Might We …?

Amp up the good so that these spaces provide students with one or more of the required social, collaborative, focused or shared spaces?

Remove the bad by providing adequate options for bags, so that both the boys and their bags are protected from the weather?

Explore the opposite so that the external and internal spaces can be repurposed in a variety of ways, as the need arises?

Question the assumption¬†that the library is a ‘work’ space only and those who are not ‘working’ are not welcome? Change perspectives (Bont, et.al. 2013)

Go after adjectives such as welcoming, social, focussed, flexible, enticing?

Identify unexpected resources such as some of our library staff, who value social interaction or furniture that is available to support such an environment?

Create an analogy from need or context such as a coffee shop or cafe booth atmosphere in the external entry by enclosing the space, using furniture and plants or screening?

Play Point of View against the challenge of considering all stakeholders Рstudents, teachers, TLs, library staff and visitors, such as tutors?

Change the status quo¬†that the library is for ‘work’ only?

Break the Point of View into pieces of being welcoming; being social and being practical?

IDEATION/THE PROTOTYPES:

  1. Costly option – enclose the front external entry with a large (two storey) pane of glass, glass display cabinets and new wide glass sliding doors. Possibility of cafe or coffee shop style furnishings. Repositioning the current doors, security gates and circulation desk would also be worthwhile, if considering this option.
  2. The most costly option – enclose the northern front entry as above, creating a reading lounge entry with the social space to be created on a verandah/deck on the south side of the library, so that students have to pass through the library to reach the social space. (Rawstorne, 2014)
  3. Continue with the cafe style option, without enclosing the space, using outdoor furniture and plants, and investigating a mobile circulation desk.
  4. Any of the above prototypes would include the smaller changes brainstormed in the OneNote, including using staff as a valuable resource.

References:

Bland, D., Hughes, H. and Willis, J. (2013). Reimagining Learning Spaces. Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from http://reimaginingspaces.education.qut.edu.au/

Bont, C. de, Ouden, P.H. den, Schifferstein, R., Smulders, F.E.H.M. & Voort, M. van der (Eds.). (2013). Advanced design methods for successful innovation. Den Haag: Design United. Retrieved from http://purl.tue.nl/568542308092309.pdf

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperBusiness.

Elliott Burns, R. (2005). Designing Spaces for Learning and Living in Schools: perspectives of a ‘flaneuse’. . In Proceedings 2005 Australian Curriculum Studies Association Biennial Conference ‘Blurring the Boundaries, Sharpening the Focus’, University of the Sunshine Coast [Queensland, Australia]. Retrieved from¬†http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4345/1/4345.pdf

IDEO. (2014). Design Thinking for Educators. Retrieved from http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/

Kumar, V. (2012). 101 Design Methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organisation. Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.101designmethods.com/

Rawstorne, T. (2014). From floor tiles that slow your trolley down to beer next to the nappies: We show you the supermarket games that make you spend more. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2619148/From-floor-tiles-slow-trolley-beer-nappies-We-supermarket-mind-games-make-spend-more.html

 

INF536 Blog Task #2 – First we observe…

Observation Task¬†–¬†

Entry to senior library, covered area and the space immediately inside the doors.

Outer entry

Covered area:

right side with group

right side with group

Left view of ramp and raised platform

Left view of ramp and raised platform

Observations:
  • students gather at the step to sit on the concrete and play Yu-gio.
  • some boys sit on the raised platform.
  • bags left outside, some carefully placed and others dropped in haste to enter the library.
  • boys collect in pairs outside the doors, standing or squatting, to check mobile phones or tablets.
  • 1/3 of the boys wipe their feet on the way into the library.
  1.  The boys playing Yu-gio selected the area for some level of protection from the weather and because they are not allowed to play in the library.
  2. the space has a lovely light and open feel as the roof is two stories high up, but noisy and exposed.
  3. boys have expressed a desire for tables or benches and bag racks.

The doorway:

Internal entry

Doors and security gates

Doors and security gates

Display area

Display area

Circulation desk

Circulation desk

  • ¬†¬†The doorway with the security gates is quite narrow and boys can only enter or leave in single file.
  • Most boys keep left, but failing to causes issues/traffic jams.
  • some boys who rush in or out, move more quickly than the automatic doors, resulting in them either running into the doors or having to stop suddenly to wait for them.
  1. comments that gates/doors are too narrow when multiple boys access; and the doors open too slowly sometimes.

Circulation desk:

  • The circulation was not staffed for the first 10 minutes. Boys glanced in the direction of the desk and then away or ignored it completely.
  • When it was staffed or a staff member was on the floor, most boys made eye contact and greeted the adult/s.
  • The library officer most often faced away from the door, facing the computer or assisting students.
  • Some boys browsed or slowed at the displays, before moving through. Others ignored the displays completely.
  • The returns box was obscured by a small stand displaying student art. Those boys who had to return books could not see it and had to negotiate around the stand quite sharply.
  • Many boys sought out the teacher librarians who were on the floor, rather than the library officer at the circulation desk. Those who did go to the desk, had to wait for a bit before being served.
  1.  Being greeted creates a lovely welcoming feel, and the boys will come over for a chat.
  2. The boys who browsed the displays expressed an interest in them, sought out the one that related to their unit of work, borrowed from the display or asked questions (especially about the banned book display).

INF536 Blog Task #1 – Centre on the customer and shake well!

Design thinking

Problem space:

Library Lab Space 1 has evolved into a silent lab, at the request of students seeking a quiet space to study. During class time, it is used either as a lab space for years 9-12, or a TL teaching space, when we work with classes or subject areas, to support specific units.

Lab space 1

The current furniture and layout is unsuited to these uses:

  1. Fixed benches facing the wall are not conducive to teaching and learning;
  2. The corners are very squished, particularly for the older grades;
  3. The round tables are more suited to a collaborative  space and this space is for quiet independent work;
  4. The furniture makes the space very cluttered and there is little opportunity to rearrange the space to suit different needs;
  5. The furniture and layout is not suited to the 1-to-1 tablet program that will be in place for all students in 2015.

Why design?

According to Ursrey (2014),¬†the creative/critical thinking that is design thinking, leads us to a solution rather than problem mindset. It is our passionate focus and awareness of our ‘clients’ (teachers and students) that enables us to best identify problems and solve them. Being customer-centric allows us to move into design thinking, where we are better able to define our problems, ideate a large number of solutions, fine-tune our ideas, pick a winner and execute the idea.

Previously, classroom spaces had the sage at the blackboard, filling empty vessels facing the front of the room. Technology then seemed to dictate that seeing our clients was less important than seeing their computer screens; and the need to access power etc, meant that rooms were ‘designed’ around the perimeter. Unfortunately, this led to students fending for themselves or needing to constantly turn to the front, making this ‘new design’ less than satisfactory.

Of the 14 things that Ursrey (2014) lists to begin designer thinking, it is being customer-centric and team focused that are the stand-outs for me. Dorst’s (2010) definitions of the Master designer as taking¬†their way of working to a level of innovation that questions the established way of working; and the work of a Visionary, as explicitly developing or redefining their field, exemplify the target that we should be aiming for.

Design in learning spaces helps users:

  • consider the relationship between learning technologies and physical space design (Radliffe, 2009)
  • develop a flexible, engaging, creative, bold environment with potential for a variety of modes of teaching and learning;
  • understand how the space is currently being used and how it can better serve the community;
  • change users’ behaviour
  • and have a sense of ownership.

Changes based on survey-

  1. Space to be renamed “Flow space”, with explanation on why it is necessary to be able to focus in order to get into the flow. Expectation that entry and exit will have minimal disruption on others.
  2. Furniture to be removed, including benches and desktops, and replaced with mobile tablet chairs (examples under consideration below).

3.  Round tables and chairs to be reused in a new collaborative space elsewhere in the library. New spaces for new purposes will be developed around social, collaborative, share and focus concepts (IDEO, 2012).

4. Projector to be replaced with either a touch table/board or wireless projector, dependant on technology budget.

5. Access to the windows and provision of glass pens for mind-mapping and brain-storming.

Other additions to be kept to a minimum, whilst clients discover the new space and make requests as needs arise, based on Brown’s (2009) minimal mapping ahead, as we test the viability, feasibility and desirability of the new space.

References:

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness. p.37.

Dorst, K. (2010). The Nature of Design Thinking. University of Technology Sydney.  http://www3.nd.edu/~amurniek/assets/DTRS8-Dorst.pdf

IDEO (2012). Design Thinking for Educators.  http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/DTtoolkit_v1_062711.pdf

Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D. and Tibbetts, B. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design space. University of Queensland.  http://www.wilsonarchitects.com.au/sites/default/files/UQ%20Next%20Generation%20Book_2.pdf

Ursrey, L. (2014). Why design thinking should be at the core of your business strategy development.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/lawtonursrey/2014/06/04/14-design-thinking-esque-tips-some-approaches-to-problem-solving-work-better-than-others/

Skip to toolbar